Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TERN vs HIMS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Equipment & Services
TERN vs HIMS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $4.64B | $6.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $2.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-94M | $128M |
| Gross Margin | — | 69.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 4.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 53.9x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $1.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $161M | $229M |
TERN vs HIMS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terns Pharmaceutica… (TERN) | 100 | 233.8 | +133.8% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 186.5 | +86.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TERN vs HIMS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TERN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.39
- EPS growth 11.8%
- 188.0% 10Y total return vs HIMS's 174.3%
HIMS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.
- 59.0% revenue growth vs TERN's -7.6%
- 5.5% margin vs TERN's 3.7%
- 6.0% ROA vs TERN's -28.5%, ROIC 10.7% vs -42.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs TERN's -7.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.5% margin vs TERN's 3.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +16.6% vs HIMS's -45.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.0% ROA vs TERN's -28.5%, ROIC 10.7% vs -42.2% |
TERN vs HIMS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TERN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIMS and TERN operate at a comparable scale, with $2.3B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $2.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$108M | $164M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$94M | $128M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$78M | $73M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +69.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +4.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +5.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +3.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +28.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.6% | -27.3% |
Valuation Metrics
TERN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.6B | $6.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.5B | $7.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -47.29x | 52.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 53.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 44.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.18x | 12.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 93.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HIMS leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HIMS delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-30 for TERN. TERN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HIMS scores 4/9 vs TERN's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -30.0% | +23.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -28.5% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -42.2% | +10.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -33.7% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 2.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$160M | $892M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $161M | $229M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TERN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TERN five years ago would be worth $32,981 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $25,051 for HIMS. Over the past 12 months, TERN leads with a +1659.7% total return vs HIMS's -45.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TERN at 59.1% vs HIMS's 31.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.1% | -19.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1659.7% | -45.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +302.8% | +126.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +229.8% | +150.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +188.0% | +174.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +59.1% | +31.4% |
Risk & Volatility
TERN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TERN is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TERN currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs HIMS's 38.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.39x | 2.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $53.18 | $70.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.66 | $13.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +38.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.9 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.7M | 35.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TERN as "Buy" and HIMS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 10.4% upside for HIMS (target: $30) vs 4.9% for TERN (target: $56).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $55.56 | $29.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.3% |
TERN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). HIMS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency).
TERN vs HIMS: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TERN or HIMS a better buy right now?
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) offers the better valuation at 52. 7x trailing P/E (53. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TERN) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TERN or HIMS?
Over the past 5 years, Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(TERN) delivered a total return of +229. 8%, compared to +150. 5% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TERN returned +188. 0% versus HIMS's +174. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TERN or HIMS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(TERN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately 508% more volatile than TERN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TERN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TERN or HIMS?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
grew EPS 11. 8% year-over-year, compared to -3. 8% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TERN or HIMS?
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 5% net margin versus 0. 0% for Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HIMS leads at 5. 2% versus 0. 0% for TERN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HIMS leads at 59. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is TERN or HIMS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HIMS: 10.
4% to $29. 67.
07Which pays a better dividend — TERN or HIMS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is TERN or HIMS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(TERN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +188. 0% 10Y return). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) carries a higher beta of 2. 40 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TERN: +188. 0%, HIMS: +174. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TERN and HIMS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TERN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.