TEVA vs LNTH

For growth investors, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited (TEVA) is the stronger pick with 4.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 5% for Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH). Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH) offers the better valuation at 26. 7x trailing P/E (17. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited (TEVA) a "Buy" — based on 46 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.

(LNTH) is the cheapest at 26. 7x versus Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited at 30. 0x. On forward P/E, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited is actually cheaper at 14. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.

(LNTH) delivered a total return of +314. 2%, compared to +246. 2% for Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited (TEVA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LNTH returned +41. 9% versus TEVA's -28. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lantheus Holdings, Inc.

(LNTH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited's 1. 13β — meaning TEVA is approximately 141% more volatile than LNTH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited (TEVA) is pulling ahead at 4.

3% versus 0. 5% for Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited grew EPS 182. 8% year-over-year, compared to -21. 8% for Lantheus Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LNTH leads at 18. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Lantheus Holdings, Inc.

(LNTH) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus 8. 2% for Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LNTH leads at 20. 2% versus 12. 5% for TEVA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LNTH leads at 61. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited (TEVA) trades at 14.

5x forward P/E versus 17. 5x for Lantheus Holdings, Inc. — 3. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LNTH: 11. 0% to $101. 00.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.

(LNTH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 47)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LNTH: +41. 9%, TEVA: -28. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.