Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TGB vs LIN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TGB
Taseko Mines Limited

Copper

Basic MaterialsAMEX • CA
Market Cap$2.26B
5Y Perf.+1725.7%
LIN
Linde plc

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • GB
Market Cap$228.85B
5Y Perf.+144.1%

TGB vs LIN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TGB logoTGB
LIN logoLIN
IndustryCopperChemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$2.26B$228.85B
Revenue (TTM)$673M$34.66B
Net Income (TTM)$-30M$7.13B
Gross Margin26.0%46.0%
Operating Margin20.5%28.8%
Forward P/E13.1x27.7x
Total Debt$747M$26.99B
Cash & Equiv.$188M$5.06B

TGB vs LINLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TGB
LIN
StockMay 20May 26Return
Taseko Mines Limited (TGB)1001825.7+1725.7%
Linde plc (LIN)100244.1+144.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TGB vs LIN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LIN leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Taseko Mines Limited is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TGB
Taseko Mines Limited
The Growth Play

TGB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 10.7%, EPS growth -104.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.8%
  • 12.7% 10Y total return vs LIN's 375.2%
  • 10.7% revenue growth vs LIN's 3.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
LIN
Linde plc
The Income Pick

LIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.24, yield 1.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.24, Low D/E 67.9%, current ratio 0.88x
  • Beta 0.24, yield 1.2%, current ratio 0.88x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTGB logoTGB10.7% revenue growth vs LIN's 3.0%
ValueTGB logoTGBLower P/E (13.1x vs 27.7x)
Quality / MarginsLIN logoLIN20.6% margin vs TGB's -4.5%
Stability / SafetyLIN logoLINBeta 0.24 vs TGB's 1.80, lower leverage
DividendsLIN logoLIN1.2% yield; 6-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)TGB logoTGB+275.6% vs LIN's +11.2%
Efficiency (ROA)LIN logoLIN8.3% ROA vs TGB's -1.3%, ROIC 11.3% vs 8.4%

TGB vs LIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TGBTaseko Mines Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

LINLinde plc
FY 2025
Americas Segment
45.9%$15.2B
EMEA Segment
25.8%$8.5B
APAC Segment
20.1%$6.7B
Engineering Segment
8.2%$2.7B

TGB vs LIN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLINLAGGINGTGB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

LIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

LIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $34.7B annually — 51.5x TGB's $673M. LIN is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TGB's -4.5%. On growth, TGB holds the edge at +45.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTGB logoTGBTaseko Mines Limi…LIN logoLINLinde plc
RevenueTrailing 12 months$673M$34.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$249M$12.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$30M$7.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$15M$5.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+26.0%+46.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+20.5%+28.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-4.5%+20.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+2.2%+14.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+45.3%+8.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+117.7%+13.4%
LIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TGB leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, TGB's 14.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LIN's 19.7x.

MetricTGB logoTGBTaseko Mines Limi…LIN logoLINLinde plc
Market CapShares × price$2.3B$228.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.7B$250.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-106.48x33.85x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.15x27.67x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.33x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.62x19.75x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.58x6.73x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.46x5.82x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF44.97x
TGB leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LIN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

LIN delivers a 17.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-5 for TGB. LIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.68x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TGB's 0.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LIN scores 6/9 vs TGB's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricTGB logoTGBTaseko Mines Limi…LIN logoLINLinde plc
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-5.0%+17.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-1.3%+8.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.4%+11.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.5%+13.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.96x0.68x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$559M$21.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$188M$5.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$747M$27.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.44x34.52x
LIN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TGB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TGB five years ago would be worth $30,335 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,394 for LIN. Over the past 12 months, TGB leads with a +275.6% total return vs LIN's +11.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TGB at 68.3% vs LIN's 11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTGB logoTGBTaseko Mines Limi…LIN logoLINLinde plc
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+29.5%+15.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+275.6%+11.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+377.0%+39.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+203.3%+73.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1267.9%+375.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+68.3%+11.8%
TGB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

LIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

LIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TGB's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LIN currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs TGB's 78.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTGB logoTGBTaseko Mines Limi…LIN logoLINLinde plc
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.80x0.24x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$9.25$521.28
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.89$387.78
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+78.4%+94.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.151.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded4.9M2.3M
LIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates TGB as "Hold" and LIN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.3% upside for LIN (target: $540) vs -48.3% for TGB (target: $4). LIN is the only dividend payer here at 1.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricTGB logoTGBTaseko Mines Limi…LIN logoLINLinde plc
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.75$539.71
# AnalystsCovering analysts828
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises6
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$6.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

LIN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TGB leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).

Best OverallLinde plc (LIN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TGB vs LIN: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TGB or LIN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) is the stronger pick with 10.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for Linde plc (LIN). Linde plc (LIN) offers the better valuation at 33. 8x trailing P/E (27. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Linde plc (LIN) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TGB or LIN?

On forward P/E, Taseko Mines Limited is actually cheaper at 13.

1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TGB or LIN?

Over the past 5 years, Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) delivered a total return of +203.

3%, compared to +73. 9% for Linde plc (LIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TGB returned +1268% versus LIN's +375. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TGB or LIN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Linde plc (LIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

24β versus Taseko Mines Limited's 1. 80β — meaning TGB is approximately 650% more volatile than LIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Linde plc (LIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 68% versus 96% for Taseko Mines Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TGB or LIN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) is pulling ahead at 10.

7% versus 3. 0% for Linde plc (LIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Linde plc grew EPS 7. 1% year-over-year, compared to -104. 2% for Taseko Mines Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, TGB leads at 19. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TGB or LIN?

Linde plc (LIN) is the more profitable company, earning 20.

3% net margin versus -4. 5% for Taseko Mines Limited — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LIN leads at 26. 3% versus 20. 5% for TGB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LIN leads at 43. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TGB or LIN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) trades at 13.

1x forward P/E versus 27. 7x for Linde plc — 14. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LIN: 9. 3% to $539. 71.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TGB or LIN?

In this comparison, LIN (1.

2% yield) pays a dividend. TGB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is TGB or LIN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

24), 1. 2% yield, +375. 2% 10Y return). Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIN: +375. 2%, TGB: +1268%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TGB and LIN?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

LIN pays a dividend while TGB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

TGB

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 22%
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LIN

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TGB and LIN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TGB: 45.3% · LIN: 8.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.