Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TGEN vs PESI vs CLNE vs ERII
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Waste Management
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
TGEN vs PESI vs CLNE vs ERII — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Waste Management | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls |
| Market Cap | $120M | $207M | $507M | $498M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $27M | $59M | $439M | $127M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $-18M | $-99M | $33M |
| Gross Margin | 36.3% | 4.1% | 11.7% | 64.5% |
| Operating Margin | -26.3% | -26.3% | 7.4% | 24.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 22.9x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $4M | $99M | $9M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $12M | $158M | $48M |
TGEN vs PESI vs CLNE vs ERII — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tecogen Inc. (TGEN) | 100 | 730.3 | +630.3% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 199.8 | +99.8% |
| Clean Energy Fuels … (CLNE) | 100 | 110.5 | +10.5% |
| Energy Recovery, In… (ERII) | 100 | 122.7 | +22.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TGEN vs PESI vs CLNE vs ERII
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TGEN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 19.7%, EPS growth -57.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.7%
- 19.7% revenue growth vs ERII's -7.1%
- +49.2% vs ERII's -37.3%
PESI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 178.6% 10Y total return vs TGEN's -3.2%
CLNE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- beta 1.19
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 1.19 vs TGEN's 3.43
ERII is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.53, Low D/E 4.6%, current ratio 10.44x
- Beta 1.53, current ratio 10.44x
- 25.9% margin vs TGEN's -30.5%
- 15.2% ROA vs TGEN's -24.2%, ROIC 10.3% vs -52.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.7% revenue growth vs ERII's -7.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.9% margin vs TGEN's -30.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.19 vs TGEN's 3.43 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +49.2% vs ERII's -37.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs TGEN's -24.2%, ROIC 10.3% vs -52.7% |
TGEN vs PESI vs CLNE vs ERII — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TGEN vs PESI vs CLNE vs ERII — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ERII leads in 2 of 6 categories
CLNE leads 2 • TGEN leads 1 • PESI leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ERII leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLNE is the larger business by revenue, generating $439M annually — 16.2x TGEN's $27M. ERII is the more profitable business, keeping 25.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TGEN's -30.5%. On growth, CLNE holds the edge at +13.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $27M | $59M | $439M | $127M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | -$14M | $62M | $41M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | -$18M | -$99M | $33M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | -$14M | $19M | $27M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.3% | +4.1% | +11.7% | +64.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -26.3% | -26.3% | +7.4% | +24.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -30.5% | -30.1% | -22.7% | +25.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -38.1% | -23.4% | +4.3% | +21.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.5% | -20.1% | +13.3% | -97.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -173.1% | -110.5% | +90.0% | +100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CLNE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ERII's 16.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CLNE's 94.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $120M | $207M | $507M | $498M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $111M | $200M | $448M | $460M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -16.07x | -14.89x | -2.29x | 22.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 22.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 94.64x | 16.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.44x | 3.36x | 1.19x | 3.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.11x | 4.11x | 0.90x | 2.48x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 8.47x | 28.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ERII leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ERII delivers a 17.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-51 for TGEN. ERII carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLNE's 0.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ERII scores 6/9 vs TGEN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -50.6% | -34.5% | -17.2% | +17.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -24.2% | -20.2% | -9.2% | +15.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -52.7% | -21.7% | -9.4% | +10.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -34.0% | -16.7% | -9.4% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.09x | 0.18x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | -$7M | -$59M | -$39M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $12M | $158M | $48M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $4M | $99M | $9M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -46.61x | -42.14x | -1.07x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TGEN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TGEN five years ago would be worth $28,023 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,619 for CLNE. Over the past 12 months, TGEN leads with a +49.2% total return vs ERII's -37.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TGEN at 77.6% vs ERII's -26.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.7% | -8.8% | +6.9% | -31.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +49.2% | +26.2% | +44.4% | -37.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +460.5% | +21.7% | -46.3% | -60.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +180.2% | +45.6% | -73.8% | -54.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.2% | +178.6% | -26.9% | -11.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +77.6% | +6.8% | -18.7% | -26.3% |
Risk & Volatility
CLNE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLNE is the less volatile stock with a 1.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TGEN's 3.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLNE currently trades 74.3% from its 52-week high vs TGEN's 39.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.43x | 1.85x | 1.19x | 1.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.07 | $16.50 | $3.11 | $18.32 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.94 | $8.02 | $1.56 | $9.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +39.9% | +67.7% | +74.3% | +51.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.9 | 41.5 | 44.6 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 486K | 164K | 1.3M | 996K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TGEN as "Buy", PESI as "Hold", CLNE as "Buy", ERII as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 211.2% upside for TGEN (target: $15) vs 37.9% for ERII (target: $13).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.00 | $18.00 | $3.50 | $13.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 1 | 22 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.6% | +7.2% |
ERII leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CLNE leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
TGEN vs PESI vs CLNE vs ERII: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TGEN or PESI or CLNE or ERII a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tecogen Inc.
(TGEN) is the stronger pick with 19. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 1% for Energy Recovery, Inc. (ERII). Energy Recovery, Inc. (ERII) offers the better valuation at 22. 5x trailing P/E (22. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tecogen Inc. (TGEN) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TGEN or PESI or CLNE or ERII?
Over the past 5 years, Tecogen Inc.
(TGEN) delivered a total return of +180. 2%, compared to -73. 8% for Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (CLNE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PESI returned +178. 6% versus CLNE's -26. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TGEN or PESI or CLNE or ERII?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Clean Energy Fuels Corp.
(CLNE) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 19β versus Tecogen Inc. 's 3. 43β — meaning TGEN is approximately 188% more volatile than CLNE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Energy Recovery, Inc. (ERII) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 18% for Clean Energy Fuels Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TGEN or PESI or CLNE or ERII?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tecogen Inc.
(TGEN) is pulling ahead at 19. 7% versus -7. 1% for Energy Recovery, Inc. (ERII). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. grew EPS 43. 6% year-over-year, compared to -173. 0% for Clean Energy Fuels Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TGEN leads at 2. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TGEN or PESI or CLNE or ERII?
Energy Recovery, Inc.
(ERII) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 0% net margin versus -52. 3% for Clean Energy Fuels Corp. — meaning it keeps 17. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ERII leads at 18. 2% versus -26. 3% for TGEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ERII leads at 65. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is TGEN or PESI or CLNE or ERII more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TGEN: 211.
2% to $15. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — TGEN or PESI or CLNE or ERII?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is TGEN or PESI or CLNE or ERII better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Clean Energy Fuels Corp.
(CLNE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 19)). Tecogen Inc. (TGEN) carries a higher beta of 3. 43 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLNE: -26. 9%, TGEN: -3. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TGEN and PESI and CLNE and ERII?
These companies operate in different sectors (TGEN (Industrials) and PESI (Industrials) and CLNE (Energy) and ERII (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TGEN is a small-cap high-growth stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLNE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ERII is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.