Broadcasting
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TGNA vs FOXA vs WBD vs SSP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Broadcasting
TGNA vs FOXA vs WBD vs SSP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Broadcasting | Entertainment | Entertainment | Broadcasting |
| Market Cap | $3.23B | $14.04B | $67.98B | $552M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.71B | $16.58B | $37.21B | $2.15B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $219M | $1.89B | $-2.15B | $-101M |
| Gross Margin | 36.2% | 33.1% | 41.5% | 33.7% |
| Operating Margin | 16.3% | 19.0% | -4.0% | 7.5% |
| Forward P/E | 6.4x | 13.5x | 93.5x | 18.7x |
| Total Debt | $2.60B | $7.46B | $32.57B | $2.73B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $-291M | $5.35B | $4.57B | $28M |
TGNA vs FOXA vs WBD vs SSP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TEGNA Inc. (TGNA) | 100 | 170.9 | +70.9% |
| Fox Corporation (FOXA) | 100 | 193.1 | +93.1% |
| Warner Bros. Discov… (WBD) | 100 | 129.5 | +29.5% |
| The E.W. Scripps Co… (SSP) | 100 | 47.9 | -52.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TGNA vs FOXA vs WBD vs SSP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TGNA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 2.5%
- 62.3% 10Y total return vs FOXA's 30.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 82.4%, current ratio 2.28x
- Beta 0.47, yield 2.5%, current ratio 2.28x
FOXA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 16.6%, EPS growth 56.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 16.6% revenue growth vs SSP's -14.3%
- 11.4% margin vs WBD's -5.8%
- 8.8% ROA vs WBD's -2.2%, ROIC 16.5% vs 1.5%
WBD is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +216.8% vs TGNA's +23.2%
SSP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.6% revenue growth vs SSP's -14.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.4x vs 18.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.4% margin vs WBD's -5.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs SSP's 1.50, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs FOXA's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +216.8% vs TGNA's +23.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.8% ROA vs WBD's -2.2%, ROIC 16.5% vs 1.5% |
TGNA vs FOXA vs WBD vs SSP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TGNA vs FOXA vs WBD vs SSP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FOXA leads in 2 of 6 categories
TGNA leads 2 • SSP leads 1 • WBD leads 1
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FOXA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WBD is the larger business by revenue, generating $37.2B annually — 17.3x SSP's $2.2B. FOXA is the more profitable business, keeping 11.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WBD's -5.8%. On growth, FOXA holds the edge at +2.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.7B | $16.6B | $37.2B | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $540M | $3.5B | $7.5B | $237M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $219M | $1.9B | -$2.2B | -$101M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $283M | $2.5B | $2.3B | $7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.2% | +33.1% | +41.5% | +33.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.3% | +19.0% | -4.0% | +7.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.1% | +11.4% | -5.8% | -4.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | +15.3% | +6.2% | +0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.9% | +2.0% | -1.0% | -23.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -69.4% | -35.8% | -5.5% | -155.4% |
Valuation Metrics
SSP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.8x trailing earnings, FOXA trades at a 86% valuation discount to WBD's 93.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FOXA's 4.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SSP's 285.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.2B | $14.0B | $68.0B | $552M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.1B | $16.2B | $96.0B | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.95x | 12.77x | 93.52x | -2.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.41x | 13.50x | — | 18.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.51x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.33x | 4.47x | 13.73x | 285.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.19x | 0.86x | 1.82x | 0.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.03x | 2.34x | 1.85x | 0.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.42x | 4.69x | 22.02x | 84.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FOXA leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FOXA delivers a 17.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-8 for SSP. FOXA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.60x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SSP's 2.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FOXA scores 8/9 vs SSP's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.0% | +17.0% | -5.9% | -7.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | +8.8% | -2.2% | -2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.8% | +16.5% | +1.5% | +3.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.7% | +16.4% | +1.5% | +3.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.82x | 0.60x | 0.88x | 2.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.9B | $2.1B | $28.0B | $2.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | -$291M | $5.4B | $4.6B | $28M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.6B | $7.5B | $32.6B | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.69x | 7.74x | 3.56x | 0.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WBD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FOXA five years ago would be worth $17,038 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,312 for SSP. Over the past 12 months, WBD leads with a +216.8% total return vs TGNA's +23.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WBD at 26.3% vs SSP's -16.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.5% | -14.6% | -4.9% | +18.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.2% | +24.5% | +216.8% | +95.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.9% | +99.9% | +101.5% | -40.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.4% | +70.4% | -27.8% | -76.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.3% | +30.6% | -3.7% | -66.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.9% | +26.0% | +26.3% | -16.1% |
Risk & Volatility
TGNA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TGNA is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SSP's 1.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TGNA currently trades 93.8% from its 52-week high vs FOXA's 82.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.47x | 0.54x | 0.90x | 1.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.35 | $76.39 | $30.00 | $5.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.87 | $49.89 | $8.06 | $2.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.8% | +82.1% | +90.4% | +86.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.1 | 49.2 | 48.9 | 60.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.9M | 3.3M | 22.2M | 715K |
Analyst Outlook
TGNA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TGNA as "Hold", FOXA as "Hold", WBD as "Hold", SSP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 11.9% upside for FOXA (target: $70) vs -16.7% for SSP (target: $4). For income investors, TGNA offers the higher dividend yield at 2.47% vs FOXA's 0.96%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.00 | $70.17 | $29.94 | $3.90 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 48 | 32 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.5% | +1.0% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.49 | $0.60 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +7.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FOXA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TGNA leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook).
TGNA vs FOXA vs WBD vs SSP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TGNA or FOXA or WBD or SSP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Fox Corporation (FOXA) is the stronger pick with 16.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 3% for The E. W. Scripps Company (SSP). Fox Corporation (FOXA) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E (13. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TEGNA Inc. (TGNA) a "Hold" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TGNA or FOXA or WBD or SSP?
On trailing P/E, Fox Corporation (FOXA) is the cheapest at 12.
8x versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. at 93. 5x. On forward P/E, TEGNA Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TGNA or FOXA or WBD or SSP?
Over the past 5 years, Fox Corporation (FOXA) delivered a total return of +70.
4%, compared to -76. 9% for The E. W. Scripps Company (SSP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TGNA returned +62. 3% versus SSP's -66. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TGNA or FOXA or WBD or SSP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TEGNA Inc.
(TGNA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus The E. W. Scripps Company's 1. 50β — meaning SSP is approximately 216% more volatile than TGNA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fox Corporation (FOXA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 60% versus 2% for The E. W. Scripps Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TGNA or FOXA or WBD or SSP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fox Corporation (FOXA) is pulling ahead at 16.
6% versus -14. 3% for The E. W. Scripps Company (SSP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. grew EPS 106. 3% year-over-year, compared to -285. 1% for The E. W. Scripps Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, FOXA leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TGNA or FOXA or WBD or SSP?
Fox Corporation (FOXA) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
9% net margin versus -4. 7% for The E. W. Scripps Company — meaning it keeps 13. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FOXA leads at 19. 8% versus 3. 5% for WBD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TGNA leads at 36. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TGNA or FOXA or WBD or SSP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TEGNA Inc.
(TGNA) trades at 6. 4x forward P/E versus 18. 7x for The E. W. Scripps Company — 12. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FOXA: 11. 9% to $70. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — TGNA or FOXA or WBD or SSP?
In this comparison, TGNA (2.
5% yield), FOXA (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. WBD, SSP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TGNA or FOXA or WBD or SSP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TEGNA Inc.
(TGNA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 47), 2. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TGNA: +62. 3%, SSP: -66. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TGNA and FOXA and WBD and SSP?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TGNA is a small-cap deep-value stock; FOXA is a mid-cap high-growth stock; WBD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SSP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. TGNA, FOXA pay a dividend while WBD, SSP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.