Oil & Gas Integrated
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TGS vs SOC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Drilling
TGS vs SOC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Drilling |
| Market Cap | $2.13B | $1.84T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.65T | $1M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $406.73B | $-498M |
| Gross Margin | 53.7% | -8.7% |
| Operating Margin | 41.3% | -367.6% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.67T | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $803.80B | $98M |
TGS vs SOC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transportadora de G… (TGS) | 100 | 674.9 | +574.9% |
| Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) | 100 | 132.5 | +32.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TGS vs SOC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TGS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 4.2%
- 449.2% 10Y total return vs SOC's 32.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 53.5%, current ratio 5.00x
SOC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- EPS growth 40.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 64.8% revenue growth vs SOC's 9.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 7.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.6% margin vs SOC's -391.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.90 vs SOC's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.0% vs SOC's -36.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.6% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC 19.3% vs -44.6% |
TGS vs SOC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGS leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.65T annually — 1300190.7x SOC's $1M. TGS is the more profitable business, keeping 24.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOC's -391.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.65T | $1M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $885.1B | -$454M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $406.7B | -$498M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $224.2B | -$611M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.7% | -8.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +41.3% | -367.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.6% | -391.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | -480.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.8% | -5.4% |
Valuation Metrics
TGS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $1.84T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.8B | $1.84T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.09x | -3.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.01x | 7.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.08x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.49x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.49x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.05x | 2359.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.98x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TGS leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TGS delivers a 14.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-114 for SOC. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TGS scores 8/9 vs SOC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.8% | -113.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.6% | -28.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.3% | -44.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.5% | -37.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $868.6B | -$98M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $803.8B | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.67T | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.01x | -2.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TGS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TGS five years ago would be worth $69,845 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,264 for SOC. Over the past 12 months, TGS leads with a +20.0% total return vs SOC's -36.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TGS at 38.4% vs SOC's 8.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.5% | +9.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.0% | -36.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +165.3% | +26.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +598.5% | +32.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +449.2% | +32.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +38.4% | +8.2% |
Risk & Volatility
TGS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TGS is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOC's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TGS currently trades 84.3% from its 52-week high vs SOC's 36.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.35 | $35.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.74 | $3.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.3% | +36.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.4 | 45.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 344K | 5.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TGS as "Buy" and SOC as "Buy". TGS is the only dividend payer here at 4.20% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1788.78 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TGS leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
TGS vs SOC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TGS or SOC a better buy right now?
Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (0. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. (TGS) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TGS or SOC?
On forward P/E, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. is actually cheaper at 0. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TGS or SOC?
Over the past 5 years, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) delivered a total return of +598. 5%, compared to +32. 6% for Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TGS returned +449. 2% versus SOC's +32. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TGS or SOC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 90β versus Sable Offshore Corp. 's 1. 51β — meaning SOC is approximately 68% more volatile than TGS relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — TGS or SOC?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sable Offshore Corp.
grew EPS 40. 6% year-over-year, compared to 32. 2% for Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TGS or SOC?
Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 7% net margin versus -391. 5% for Sable Offshore Corp. — meaning it keeps 24. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TGS leads at 43. 3% versus -367. 6% for SOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TGS leads at 53. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TGS or SOC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 7. 5x for Sable Offshore Corp. — 7. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — TGS or SOC?
In this comparison, TGS (4.
2% yield) pays a dividend. SOC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TGS or SOC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90), 4. 2% yield, +449. 2% 10Y return). Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TGS: +449. 2%, SOC: +32. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TGS and SOC?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TGS is a small-cap high-growth stock; SOC is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. TGS pays a dividend while SOC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.