Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
THFF vs MVBF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
THFF vs MVBF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $807M | $335M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $326M | $270M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $79M | $27M |
| Gross Margin | 77.7% | 71.7% |
| Operating Margin | 30.4% | 13.6% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 15.7x |
| Total Debt | $481M | $77M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $130M | $244M |
THFF vs MVBF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Financial Cor… (THFF) | 100 | 193.3 | +93.3% |
| MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) | 100 | 183.5 | +83.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: THFF vs MVBF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
THFF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 3.0%
- 134.1% 10Y total return vs MVBF's 133.0%
- Beta 0.92, yield 3.0%, current ratio 0.18x
MVBF is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 34.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 0.09x
- 19.0% NII/revenue growth vs THFF's 6.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.0% NII/revenue growth vs THFF's 6.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.4x vs 15.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs MVBF's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs THFF's 0.92, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs MVBF's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +49.1% vs THFF's +36.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs MVBF's 0.6% |
THFF vs MVBF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
THFF vs MVBF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
THFF leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
THFF and MVBF operate at a comparable scale, with $326M and $270M in trailing revenue. THFF is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MVBF's 10.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $326M | $270M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $108M | $39M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $79M | $27M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $88M | $2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.7% | +71.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.4% | +13.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.3% | +10.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +0.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.2% | -55.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — THFF and MVBF each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.2x trailing earnings, THFF trades at a 20% valuation discount to MVBF's 12.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MVBF's 4.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than THFF's 10.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $807M | $335M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $168M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.16x | 12.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.42x | 15.70x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.91x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.67x | 4.56x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.47x | 1.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.24x | 1.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.46x | 158.42x |
Profitability & Efficiency
THFF leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
THFF delivers a 13.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $8 for MVBF. MVBF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to THFF's 0.74x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.0% | +8.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.9% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.7% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.74x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $350M | -$167M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $130M | $244M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $481M | $77M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.31x | 0.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
THFF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in THFF five years ago would be worth $16,936 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,908 for MVBF. Over the past 12 months, MVBF leads with a +49.1% total return vs THFF's +36.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors THFF at 31.2% vs MVBF's 17.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.9% | +3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.7% | +49.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +126.0% | +63.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.4% | -30.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +134.1% | +133.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.2% | +17.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — THFF and MVBF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MVBF is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than THFF's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. THFF currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs MVBF's 88.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.92x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $69.21 | $29.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $49.70 | $17.13 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.0% | +88.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.6 | 54.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 78K | 34K |
Analyst Outlook
THFF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates THFF as "Hold" and MVBF as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.1% upside for MVBF (target: $30) vs -26.3% for THFF (target: $50). For income investors, THFF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.00% vs MVBF's 2.55%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $50.00 | $30.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.0% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.04 | $0.66 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +3.0% |
THFF leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
THFF vs MVBF: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is THFF or MVBF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MVB Financial Corp.
(MVBF) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 2% for First Financial Corporation (THFF). First Financial Corporation (THFF) offers the better valuation at 10. 2x trailing P/E (9. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — THFF or MVBF?
On trailing P/E, First Financial Corporation (THFF) is the cheapest at 10.
2x versus MVB Financial Corp. at 12. 7x. On forward P/E, First Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — THFF or MVBF?
Over the past 5 years, First Financial Corporation (THFF) delivered a total return of +69.
4%, compared to -30. 9% for MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: THFF returned +134. 1% versus MVBF's +133. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — THFF or MVBF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MVB Financial Corp.
(MVBF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus First Financial Corporation's 0. 92β — meaning THFF is approximately 11% more volatile than MVBF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 74% for First Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — THFF or MVBF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MVB Financial Corp.
(MVBF) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus 6. 2% for First Financial Corporation (THFF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Financial Corporation grew EPS 67. 0% year-over-year, compared to 34. 6% for MVB Financial Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — THFF or MVBF?
First Financial Corporation (THFF) is the more profitable company, earning 24.
3% net margin versus 10. 0% for MVB Financial Corp. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: THFF leads at 30. 4% versus 13. 6% for MVBF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — THFF leads at 77. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is THFF or MVBF more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, First Financial Corporation (THFF) trades at 9.
4x forward P/E versus 15. 7x for MVB Financial Corp. — 6. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MVBF: 15. 1% to $30. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — THFF or MVBF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
First Financial Corporation (THFF) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 2. 5% for MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF).
09Is THFF or MVBF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MVB Financial Corp.
(MVBF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 2. 5% yield, +133. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MVBF: +133. 0%, THFF: +134. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between THFF and MVBF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: THFF is a small-cap deep-value stock; MVBF is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.