Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

THH vs SPIR vs ASTS vs GAMB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
THH
TryHard Holdings Limited

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • JP
Market Cap$16M
5Y Perf.-58.0%
SPIR
Spire Global, Inc.

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$579.83B
5Y Perf.-77.9%
ASTS
AST SpaceMobile, Inc.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$21.79B
5Y Perf.+576.8%
GAMB
Gambling.com Group Limited

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • JE
Market Cap$149M
5Y Perf.-39.3%

THH vs SPIR vs ASTS vs GAMB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
THH logoTHH
SPIR logoSPIR
ASTS logoASTS
GAMB logoGAMB
IndustrySpecialty Business ServicesSpecialty Business ServicesCommunication EquipmentGambling, Resorts & Casinos
Market Cap$16M$579.83B$21.79B$149M
Revenue (TTM)$24M$72M$85M$155M
Net Income (TTM)$103K$-25.02B$-487M$2M
Gross Margin18.9%40.8%-27.0%93.2%
Operating Margin2.4%-121.4%-440.5%2.6%
Forward P/E9999.0x11.0x8.3x
Total Debt$13.98B$8.76B$2.24B$28M
Cash & Equiv.$93M$24.81B$2.34B$14M

THH vs SPIR vs ASTS vs GAMBLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

THH
SPIR
ASTS
GAMB
StockJul 21May 26Return
Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR)10022.1-77.9%
AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS)100676.8+576.8%
Gambling.com Group … (GAMB)10060.7-39.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: THH vs SPIR vs ASTS vs GAMB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GAMB leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. AST SpaceMobile, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
THH
TryHard Holdings Limited
The Growth Angle

THH plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: industrials exposure
SPIR
Spire Global, Inc.
The Value Angle

SPIR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
ASTS
AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
The Growth Play

ASTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
  • 6.5% 10Y total return vs GAMB's -46.9%
  • 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
  • +168.6% vs THH's -98.7%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
GAMB
Gambling.com Group Limited
The Income Pick

GAMB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 1.38
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.38, Low D/E 22.7%, current ratio 1.17x
  • Beta 1.38, current ratio 1.17x
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthASTS logoASTS15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
ValueGAMB logoGAMBBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsGAMB logoGAMB1.2% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
Stability / SafetyGAMB logoGAMBBeta 1.38 vs SPIR's 3.10
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ASTS logoASTS+168.6% vs THH's -98.7%
Efficiency (ROA)GAMB logoGAMB0.7% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC 23.0% vs -0.1%

THH vs SPIR vs ASTS vs GAMB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

THHTryHard Holdings Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

SPIRSpire Global, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ASTSAST SpaceMobile, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
62.6%$44M
Service
37.4%$27M
GAMBGambling.com Group Limited
FY 2024
Casino Revenue
72.5%$92M
Sports
26.2%$33M
Other Product Type Revenue
1.3%$2M

THH vs SPIR vs ASTS vs GAMB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLGAMBLAGGINGSPIR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

GAMB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

GAMB is the larger business by revenue, generating $155M annually — 6.5x THH's $24M. GAMB is the more profitable business, keeping 1.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +19.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTHH logoTHHTryHard Holdings …SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …GAMB logoGAMBGambling.com Grou…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$24M$72M$85M$155M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1M-$74M-$317M$20M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$103,366-$25.0B-$487M$2M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$2M-$16.2B-$1.3B$39M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+18.9%+40.8%-27.0%+93.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+2.4%-121.4%-4.4%+2.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+0.4%-349.6%-5.7%+1.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-7.1%-227.0%-15.3%+25.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+36.2%-26.9%+19.5%+21.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+59.5%-2.3%-145.8%
GAMB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

GAMB leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

At 5.1x trailing earnings, GAMB trades at a 100% valuation discount to THH's 9999.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GAMB's 3.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than THH's 18.6x.

MetricTHH logoTHHTryHard Holdings …SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …GAMB logoGAMBGambling.com Grou…
Market CapShares × price$16M$579.8B$21.8B$149M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$104M$563.8B$21.7B$164M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS9999.00x10.96x-54.45x5.06x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.30x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.65x3.95x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.10x8103.46x307.28x1.18x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share465.57x4.99x7.81x1.25x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF39.20x
GAMB leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

GAMB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

GAMB delivers a 1.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-88 for SPIR. SPIR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to THH's 2.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GAMB scores 7/9 vs THH's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricTHH logoTHHTryHard Holdings …SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …GAMB logoGAMBGambling.com Grou…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+0.0%-88.4%-24.9%+1.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.0%-47.3%-12.6%+0.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.7%-0.1%-16.8%+23.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+4.1%-0.1%-10.0%+26.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93547
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.58x0.08x0.94x0.23x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$13.9B-$16.1B-$97M$14M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$93M$24.8B$2.3B$14M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$14.0B$8.8B$2.2B$28M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2698.44x9.20x-13.14x1.79x
GAMB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ASTS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ASTS five years ago would be worth $99,265 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $131 for THH. Over the past 12 months, ASTS leads with a +168.6% total return vs THH's -98.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASTS at 142.1% vs THH's -76.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTHH logoTHHTryHard Holdings …SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …GAMB logoGAMBGambling.com Grou…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-98.4%+125.9%-12.6%-19.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-98.7%+89.9%+168.6%-70.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.7%+206.8%+1319.5%-57.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.7%-77.7%+892.7%-46.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.7%-76.8%+646.8%-46.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-76.5%+45.3%+142.1%-24.8%
ASTS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SPIR and GAMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

GAMB is the less volatile stock with a 1.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 3.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SPIR currently trades 74.8% from its 52-week high vs THH's 0.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTHH logoTHHTryHard Holdings …SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …GAMB logoGAMBGambling.com Grou…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.24x3.10x2.83x1.38x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$55.05$23.59$129.89$14.95
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.31$6.60$22.47$3.51
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+0.6%+74.8%+56.2%+28.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10037.655.653.264.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded467K1.7M15.7M742K
Evenly matched — SPIR and GAMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: SPIR as "Buy", ASTS as "Buy", GAMB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.7% upside for GAMB (target: $7) vs -2.2% for SPIR (target: $17).

MetricTHH logoTHHTryHard Holdings …SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …GAMB logoGAMBGambling.com Grou…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$17.25$103.65$7.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1278
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+18.1%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

GAMB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ASTS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallGambling.com Group Limited (GAMB)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

THH vs SPIR vs ASTS vs GAMB: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is THH or SPIR or ASTS or GAMB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.

(ASTS) is the stronger pick with 1505% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Gambling. com Group Limited (GAMB) offers the better valuation at 5. 1x trailing P/E (8. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — THH or SPIR or ASTS or GAMB?

On trailing P/E, Gambling.

com Group Limited (GAMB) is the cheapest at 5. 1x versus TryHard Holdings Limited at 9999. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — THH or SPIR or ASTS or GAMB?

Over the past 5 years, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.

(ASTS) delivered a total return of +892. 7%, compared to -98. 7% for TryHard Holdings Limited (THH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASTS returned +646. 8% versus THH's -98. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — THH or SPIR or ASTS or GAMB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gambling.

com Group Limited (GAMB) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 38β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 3. 10β — meaning SPIR is approximately 125% more volatile than GAMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 3% for TryHard Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — THH or SPIR or ASTS or GAMB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), AST SpaceMobile, Inc.

(ASTS) is pulling ahead at 1505% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to -99. 9% for TryHard Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASTS leads at 72. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — THH or SPIR or ASTS or GAMB?

Spire Global, Inc.

(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus -482. 2% for AST SpaceMobile, Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GAMB leads at 28. 1% versus -405. 7% for ASTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GAMB leads at 94. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is THH or SPIR or ASTS or GAMB more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GAMB: 64.

7% to $7. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — THH or SPIR or ASTS or GAMB?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is THH or SPIR or ASTS or GAMB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Gambling.

com Group Limited (GAMB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. TryHard Holdings Limited (THH) carries a higher beta of 2. 24 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GAMB: -46. 9%, THH: -98. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between THH and SPIR and ASTS and GAMB?

These companies operate in different sectors (THH (Industrials) and SPIR (Industrials) and ASTS (Technology) and GAMB (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: THH is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GAMB is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

THH

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SPIR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ASTS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 976%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GAMB

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Gross Margin > 55%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform THH and SPIR and ASTS and GAMB on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(THH: 36.2% · SPIR: -26.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(THH: 9999.0x · SPIR: 11.0x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.