Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
THR vs BDC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
THR vs BDC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $2.26B | $4.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $522M | $2.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $59M | $237M |
| Gross Margin | 44.8% | 35.8% |
| Operating Margin | 15.9% | 12.3% |
| Forward P/E | 32.4x | 14.5x |
| Total Debt | $152M | $1.47B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $40M | $390M |
THR vs BDC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thermon Group Holdi… (THR) | 100 | 428.9 | +328.9% |
| Belden Inc. (BDC) | 100 | 336.8 | +236.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: THR vs BDC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
THR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.49
- 267.3% 10Y total return vs BDC's 88.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.49, Low D/E 30.6%, current ratio 2.43x
BDC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 10.3%, EPS growth 23.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.4%
- PEG 0.39 vs THR's 0.95
- Beta 1.41, yield 0.2%, current ratio 1.93x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.3% revenue growth vs THR's 0.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.5x vs 32.4x), PEG 0.39 vs 0.95 | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.3% margin vs BDC's 8.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.41 vs THR's 1.49 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +149.7% vs BDC's +10.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.2% ROA vs BDC's 6.8%, ROIC 9.8% vs 11.0% |
THR vs BDC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
THR vs BDC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
THR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BDC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.8B annually — 5.3x THR's $522M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 11.3% (THR) to 8.5% (BDC).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $522M | $2.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $106M | $475M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $59M | $237M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $55M | $180M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.8% | +35.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.9% | +12.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +8.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.5% | +6.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.6% | +11.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.9% | +2.4% |
Valuation Metrics
BDC leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.4x trailing earnings, BDC trades at a 56% valuation discount to THR's 43.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BDC offers better value at 0.52x vs THR's 1.28x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $4.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.4B | $5.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 43.79x | 19.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 32.40x | 14.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.28x | 0.52x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 23.22x | 12.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.53x | 1.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.73x | 3.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 42.71x | 20.41x |
Profitability & Efficiency
THR leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BDC delivers a 18.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $11 for THR. THR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BDC's 1.17x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.9% | +18.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.2% | +6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.8% | +11.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.3% | +12.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.31x | 1.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $112M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $40M | $390M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $152M | $1.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.25x | 6.89x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
THR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in THR five years ago would be worth $35,059 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $22,829 for BDC. Over the past 12 months, THR leads with a +149.7% total return vs BDC's +10.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors THR at 48.2% vs BDC's 12.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +82.7% | -2.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +149.7% | +10.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +225.4% | +43.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +250.6% | +128.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +267.3% | +88.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +48.2% | +12.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — THR and BDC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BDC is the less volatile stock with a 1.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than THR's 1.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. THR currently trades 96.5% from its 52-week high vs BDC's 71.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.49x | 1.41x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $71.24 | $159.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.86 | $102.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.5% | +71.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 80.6 | 33.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 576K | 376K |
Analyst Outlook
THR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates THR as "Buy" and BDC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.8% upside for BDC (target: $150) vs -17.1% for THR (target: $57). BDC is the only dividend payer here at 0.17% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $57.00 | $150.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.20 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +4.8% |
THR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BDC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
THR vs BDC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is THR or BDC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Belden Inc.
(BDC) is the stronger pick with 10. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 7% for Thermon Group Holdings, Inc. (THR). Belden Inc. (BDC) offers the better valuation at 19. 4x trailing P/E (14. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Thermon Group Holdings, Inc. (THR) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — THR or BDC?
On trailing P/E, Belden Inc.
(BDC) is the cheapest at 19. 4x versus Thermon Group Holdings, Inc. at 43. 8x. On forward P/E, Belden Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Belden Inc. wins at 0. 39x versus Thermon Group Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 95x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — THR or BDC?
Over the past 5 years, Thermon Group Holdings, Inc.
(THR) delivered a total return of +250. 6%, compared to +128. 3% for Belden Inc. (BDC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: THR returned +267. 3% versus BDC's +88. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — THR or BDC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Belden Inc.
(BDC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 41β versus Thermon Group Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 49β — meaning THR is approximately 5% more volatile than BDC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Thermon Group Holdings, Inc. (THR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 117% for Belden Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — THR or BDC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Belden Inc.
(BDC) is pulling ahead at 10. 3% versus 0. 7% for Thermon Group Holdings, Inc. (THR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Belden Inc. grew EPS 23. 1% year-over-year, compared to 4. 0% for Thermon Group Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, THR leads at 11. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — THR or BDC?
Thermon Group Holdings, Inc.
(THR) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 7% net margin versus 8. 7% for Belden Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: THR leads at 16. 0% versus 12. 2% for BDC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — THR leads at 44. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is THR or BDC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Belden Inc. (BDC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 39x versus Thermon Group Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 95x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Belden Inc. (BDC) trades at 14. 5x forward P/E versus 32. 4x for Thermon Group Holdings, Inc. — 17. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BDC: 30. 8% to $150. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — THR or BDC?
In this comparison, BDC (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. THR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is THR or BDC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Thermon Group Holdings, Inc.
(THR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+267. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (THR: +267. 3%, BDC: +88. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between THR and BDC?
These companies operate in different sectors (THR (Industrials) and BDC (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.