Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
THRM vs MPAA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
THRM vs MPAA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $946M | $223M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.53B | $771M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $23M | $2M |
| Gross Margin | 23.6% | 19.2% |
| Operating Margin | 4.7% | 6.1% |
| Forward P/E | 11.6x | 15.5x |
| Total Debt | $295M | $201M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $161M | $9M |
THRM vs MPAA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gentherm Incorporat… (THRM) | 100 | 75.8 | -24.2% |
| Motorcar Parts of A… (MPAA) | 100 | 73.5 | -26.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: THRM vs MPAA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
THRM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- -14.7% 10Y total return vs MPAA's -62.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.43, Low D/E 40.9%, current ratio 1.92x
- Lower P/E (11.6x vs 15.5x)
MPAA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.99
- Rev growth 5.5%, EPS growth 60.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.2%
- Beta 0.99, current ratio 1.46x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.5% revenue growth vs THRM's 2.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.6x vs 15.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.5% margin vs MPAA's 0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs THRM's 1.43 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.0% vs THRM's +20.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.6% ROA vs MPAA's 0.2%, ROIC 7.3% vs 6.2% |
THRM vs MPAA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
THRM vs MPAA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
THRM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
THRM is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 2.0x MPAA's $771M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.5% (THRM) to 0.3% (MPAA). On growth, THRM holds the edge at +11.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $771M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $127M | $49M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $23M | $2M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $79M | $30M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.6% | +19.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +6.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +0.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | +3.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.3% | -9.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MPAA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, THRM's 8.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MPAA's 8.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $946M | $223M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $415M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 51.45x | -11.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.60x | 15.49x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.23x | 8.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.63x | 0.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.33x | 0.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.48x | 5.46x |
Profitability & Efficiency
THRM leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
THRM delivers a 3.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $1 for MPAA. THRM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.41x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MPAA's 0.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MPAA scores 7/9 vs THRM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.2% | +0.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.3% | +6.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.2% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.41x | 0.78x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $134M | $192M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $161M | $9M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $295M | $201M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.83x | 0.94x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MPAA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MPAA five years ago would be worth $4,962 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,281 for THRM. Over the past 12 months, MPAA leads with a +28.0% total return vs THRM's +20.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MPAA at 35.1% vs THRM's -19.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.2% | -6.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.0% | +28.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.9% | +146.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.2% | -50.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.7% | -62.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -19.5% | +35.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — THRM and MPAA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MPAA is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than THRM's 1.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. THRM currently trades 78.2% from its 52-week high vs MPAA's 64.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.43x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.48 | $18.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.47 | $9.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.2% | +64.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.0 | 53.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 242K | 88K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates THRM as "Buy" and MPAA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 72.1% upside for MPAA (target: $20) vs 18.8% for THRM (target: $37).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $36.67 | $20.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | +2.2% |
THRM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MPAA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
THRM vs MPAA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is THRM or MPAA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.
(MPAA) is the stronger pick with 5. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 6% for Gentherm Incorporated (THRM). Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) offers the better valuation at 51. 5x trailing P/E (11. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — THRM or MPAA?
On forward P/E, Gentherm Incorporated is actually cheaper at 11.
6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — THRM or MPAA?
Over the past 5 years, Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.
(MPAA) delivered a total return of -50. 4%, compared to -57. 2% for Gentherm Incorporated (THRM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: THRM returned -14. 7% versus MPAA's -62. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — THRM or MPAA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.
(MPAA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Gentherm Incorporated's 1. 43β — meaning THRM is approximately 45% more volatile than MPAA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 41% versus 78% for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — THRM or MPAA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.
(MPAA) is pulling ahead at 5. 5% versus 2. 6% for Gentherm Incorporated (THRM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. grew EPS 60. 6% year-over-year, compared to -70. 9% for Gentherm Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, THRM leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — THRM or MPAA?
Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) is the more profitable company, earning 1.
2% net margin versus -2. 6% for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPAA leads at 5. 3% versus 5. 2% for THRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — THRM leads at 23. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is THRM or MPAA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) trades at 11.
6x forward P/E versus 15. 5x for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. — 3. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MPAA: 72. 1% to $20. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — THRM or MPAA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is THRM or MPAA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.
(MPAA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 99)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MPAA: -62. 4%, THRM: -14. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between THRM and MPAA?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.