TIC
TIC Solutions, Inc.
Specialty Business Services
Market Cap$2.28B
5Y Perf.-16.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TIC vs ULS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
ULS
UL Solutions Inc.
Specialty Business Services
Market Cap$21.08B
5Y Perf.+97.2%
TIC vs ULS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TIC | ULS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Specialty Business Services |
| Market Cap | $2.28B | $21.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.78B | $3.11B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-103M | $349M |
| Gross Margin | 31.8% | 49.6% |
| Operating Margin | -0.6% | 17.8% |
| Forward P/E | 72.6x | 48.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.71B | $832M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $440M | $295M |
TIC vs ULS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TIC
ULS
| Stock | Feb 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TIC Solutions, Inc. (TIC) | 100 | 83.4 | -16.6% |
| UL Solutions Inc. (ULS) | 100 | 197.2 | +97.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TIC vs ULS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ULS leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. TIC Solutions, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TIC
TIC Solutions, Inc.
The Income Pick
TIC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.65
- Rev growth 39.4%, EPS growth -353.8%
- 39.4% revenue growth vs ULS's 6.4%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
ULS
UL Solutions Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
ULS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 203.2% 10Y total return vs TIC's -14.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 64.3%, current ratio 1.32x
- Beta 0.73, yield 0.5%, current ratio 1.32x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TIC | 39.4% revenue growth vs ULS's 6.4% |
| Value | ULS | Lower P/E (48.0x vs 72.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | ULS | 11.2% margin vs TIC's -5.8% |
| Stability / Safety | ULS | Beta 0.73 vs TIC's 1.65, lower leverage |
| Dividends | ULS | 0.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | ULS | +56.6% vs TIC's +4.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ULS | 11.9% ROA vs TIC's -2.7%, ROIC 23.1% vs 0.2% |
TIC vs ULS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
TIC vs ULS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLULSLAGGINGTIC
TICTIC Solutions, Inc.
1leads
ULSUL Solutions Inc.
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs TICMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ULS5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TIC5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ULS9/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
ULS6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
ULS2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ULS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ULS is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 1.7x TIC's $1.8B. ULS is the more profitable business, keeping 11.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TIC's -5.8%. On growth, TIC holds the edge at +108.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TICTIC Solutions, In… | ULSUL Solutions Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $197M | $742M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$103M | $349M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$945,100 | $300M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.8% | +49.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | +17.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.8% | +11.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.1% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +108.4% | +7.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.5% | +36.4% |
ULS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
TIC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, TIC's 19.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ULS's 28.5x.
| Metric | TICTIC Solutions, In… | ULSUL Solutions Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $21.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.6B | $21.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -17.47x | 65.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 72.55x | 48.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 9.87x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.01x | 28.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.49x | 6.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.75x | 16.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 37.20x | 52.30x |
TIC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ULS leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ULS delivers a 28.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-6 for TIC. ULS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.64x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TIC's 0.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ULS scores 7/9 vs TIC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | TICTIC Solutions, In… | ULSUL Solutions Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.5% | +28.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.7% | +11.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.2% | +23.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.3% | +24.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.79x | 0.64x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | $537M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $440M | $295M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $832M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.01x | 18.89x |
ULS leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ULS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ULS five years ago would be worth $30,318 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,592 for TIC. Over the past 12 months, ULS leads with a +56.6% total return vs TIC's +4.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ULS at 44.7% vs TIC's -4.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TICTIC Solutions, In… | ULSUL Solutions Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.2% | +29.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.1% | +56.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.1% | +203.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.1% | +203.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.1% | +203.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.9% | +44.7% |
ULS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ULS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ULS is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TIC's 1.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ULS currently trades 97.5% from its 52-week high vs TIC's 69.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TICTIC Solutions, In… | ULSUL Solutions Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.65x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.94 | $107.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.36 | $60.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.0% | +97.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.3 | 76.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.1M | 700K |
ULS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TIC as "Hold" and ULS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.5% upside for TIC (target: $15) vs -14.8% for ULS (target: $89). ULS is the only dividend payer here at 0.49% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | TICTIC Solutions, In… | ULSUL Solutions Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.00 | $89.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
ULS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TIC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Best OverallUL Solutions Inc. (ULS)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TIC vs ULS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TIC or ULS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TIC Solutions, Inc.
(TIC) is the stronger pick with 39. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 4% for UL Solutions Inc. (ULS). UL Solutions Inc. (ULS) offers the better valuation at 65. 6x trailing P/E (48. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UL Solutions Inc. (ULS) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TIC or ULS?
On forward P/E, UL Solutions Inc.
is actually cheaper at 48. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TIC or ULS?
Over the past 5 years, UL Solutions Inc.
(ULS) delivered a total return of +203. 2%, compared to -14. 1% for TIC Solutions, Inc. (TIC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ULS returned +203. 2% versus TIC's -14. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TIC or ULS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), UL Solutions Inc.
(ULS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus TIC Solutions, Inc. 's 1. 65β — meaning TIC is approximately 127% more volatile than ULS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, UL Solutions Inc. (ULS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 64% versus 79% for TIC Solutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TIC or ULS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TIC Solutions, Inc.
(TIC) is pulling ahead at 39. 4% versus 6. 4% for UL Solutions Inc. (ULS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: UL Solutions Inc. grew EPS -1. 2% year-over-year, compared to -353. 8% for TIC Solutions, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TIC or ULS?
UL Solutions Inc.
(ULS) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 6% net margin versus -5. 7% for TIC Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ULS leads at 17. 1% versus 0. 6% for TIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ULS leads at 49. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TIC or ULS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, UL Solutions Inc.
(ULS) trades at 48. 0x forward P/E versus 72. 6x for TIC Solutions, Inc. — 24. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TIC: 45. 5% to $15. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TIC or ULS?
In this comparison, ULS (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. TIC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TIC or ULS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, UL Solutions Inc.
(ULS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), +203. 2% 10Y return). TIC Solutions, Inc. (TIC) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ULS: +203. 2%, TIC: -14. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TIC and ULS?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TIC is a small-cap high-growth stock; ULS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(TIC: 108.4% · ULS: 7.5%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.