Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TISI vs CECO vs GLDD vs MYRG vs PRIM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
TISI vs CECO vs GLDD vs MYRG vs PRIM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $78M | $2.92B | $1.14B | $6.65B | $5.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $885M | $812M | $888M | $3.82B | $7.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-53M | $17M | $73M | $142M | $248M |
| Gross Margin | 26.1% | 34.3% | 22.9% | 11.9% | 10.4% |
| Operating Margin | 1.1% | 7.6% | 14.1% | 5.1% | 4.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 48.8x | 15.4x | 44.0x | 18.1x |
| Total Debt | $369M | $25M | $458M | $104M | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $36M | $33M | $13M | $150M | $541M |
TISI vs CECO vs GLDD vs MYRG vs PRIM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team, Inc. (TISI) | 100 | 35.1 | -64.9% |
| CECO Environmental … (CECO) | 100 | 1532.6 | +1432.6% |
| Great Lakes Dredge … (GLDD) | 100 | 183.4 | +83.4% |
| MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) | 100 | 1483.4 | +1383.4% |
| Primoris Services C… (PRIM) | 100 | 647.2 | +547.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TISI vs CECO vs GLDD vs MYRG vs PRIM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TISI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.47, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.47 vs PRIM's 1.83
CECO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 38.8%, EPS growth 280.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.4%
- 38.8% revenue growth vs TISI's -1.2%
- +220.1% vs TISI's -19.0%
GLDD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.92
- Lower P/E (15.4x vs 44.0x)
- 8.3% margin vs TISI's -5.9%
MYRG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 16.8% 10Y total return vs CECO's 12.8%
- 8.7% ROA vs TISI's -9.9%, ROIC 18.3% vs 2.2%
PRIM is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.98 vs GLDD's 9.93
- 0.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 38.8% revenue growth vs TISI's -1.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.4x vs 44.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.3% margin vs TISI's -5.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs PRIM's 1.83 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +220.1% vs TISI's -19.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.7% ROA vs TISI's -9.9%, ROIC 18.3% vs 2.2% |
TISI vs CECO vs GLDD vs MYRG vs PRIM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TISI vs CECO vs GLDD vs MYRG vs PRIM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GLDD leads in 2 of 6 categories
TISI leads 1 • MYRG leads 1 • CECO leads 1 • PRIM leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GLDD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRIM is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 9.2x CECO's $812M. GLDD is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TISI's -5.9%. On growth, GLDD holds the edge at +26.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $885M | $812M | $888M | $3.8B | $7.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $44M | $86M | $169M | $261M | $437M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$53M | $17M | $73M | $142M | $248M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$16M | $4M | $99M | $231M | $165M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +34.3% | +22.9% | +11.9% | +10.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.1% | +7.6% | +14.1% | +5.1% | +4.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.9% | +2.1% | +8.3% | +3.7% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.8% | +0.5% | +11.2% | +6.0% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | +21.5% | +26.5% | +20.0% | -5.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.3% | -91.8% | -34.5% | +106.2% | -60.5% |
Valuation Metrics
TISI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.7x trailing earnings, GLDD trades at a 74% valuation discount to CECO's 59.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PRIM offers better value at 1.17x vs GLDD's 10.15x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $78M | $2.9B | $1.1B | $6.7B | $5.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $411M | $2.9B | $1.6B | $6.6B | $6.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.00x | 59.40x | 15.74x | 56.76x | 21.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 48.83x | 15.40x | 44.03x | 18.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.39x | 10.15x | 3.40x | 1.17x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.85x | 38.01x | 9.34x | 28.84x | 13.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.09x | 3.77x | 1.28x | 1.82x | 0.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 44.06x | 9.22x | 2.23x | 10.18x | 3.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.85x | — | 11.41x | 28.66x | 17.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MYRG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MYRG delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-164 for TISI. CECO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TISI's 212.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GLDD scores 8/9 vs PRIM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -164.5% | +5.4% | +14.8% | +22.1% | +15.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.9% | +1.9% | +5.8% | +8.7% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.2% | +10.0% | +9.7% | +18.3% | +13.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.7% | +9.4% | +11.4% | +19.4% | +16.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 212.04x | 0.08x | 0.89x | 0.16x | 0.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $333M | -$8M | $445M | -$47M | $735M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $36M | $33M | $13M | $150M | $541M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $369M | $25M | $458M | $104M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.21x | 2.74x | 3.32x | 39.49x | 21.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CECO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CECO five years ago would be worth $110,271 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,943 for TISI. Over the past 12 months, CECO leads with a +220.1% total return vs TISI's -19.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CECO at 88.7% vs GLDD's 42.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.5% | +36.1% | +28.2% | +88.5% | -17.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -19.0% | +220.1% | +72.1% | +175.2% | +62.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +270.2% | +572.0% | +190.6% | +219.8% | +346.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.6% | +1002.7% | +19.7% | +417.6% | +234.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.7% | +1281.8% | +276.9% | +1680.8% | +402.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +54.7% | +88.7% | +42.7% | +47.3% | +64.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TISI and GLDD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TISI is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRIM's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GLDD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs PRIM's 52.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.47x | 1.36x | 0.92x | 1.70x | 1.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.25 | $90.25 | $17.02 | $475.39 | $205.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.34 | $24.71 | $9.85 | $152.10 | $65.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.3% | +90.2% | +99.9% | +89.9% | +52.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.9 | 75.7 | 68.5 | 80.7 | 30.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 673K | 1.9M | 306K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
GLDD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CECO as "Buy", GLDD as "Buy", MYRG as "Hold", PRIM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 48.7% upside for PRIM (target: $161) vs -15.3% for MYRG (target: $362). PRIM is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $86.20 | — | $362.00 | $160.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 7 | 21 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.0% | +1.2% | +0.2% |
GLDD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). TISI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
TISI vs CECO vs GLDD vs MYRG vs PRIM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TISI or CECO or GLDD or MYRG or PRIM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CECO Environmental Corp.
(CECO) is the stronger pick with 38. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 2% for Team, Inc. (TISI). Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) offers the better valuation at 15. 7x trailing P/E (15. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CECO Environmental Corp. (CECO) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TISI or CECO or GLDD or MYRG or PRIM?
On trailing P/E, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) is the cheapest at 15.
7x versus CECO Environmental Corp. at 59. 4x. On forward P/E, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Primoris Services Corporation wins at 0. 98x versus Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation's 9. 93x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TISI or CECO or GLDD or MYRG or PRIM?
Over the past 5 years, CECO Environmental Corp.
(CECO) delivered a total return of +1003%, compared to -80. 6% for Team, Inc. (TISI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MYRG returned +1681% versus TISI's -93. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TISI or CECO or GLDD or MYRG or PRIM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Team, Inc.
(TISI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus Primoris Services Corporation's 1. 83β — meaning PRIM is approximately 291% more volatile than TISI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CECO Environmental Corp. (CECO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 212% for Team, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TISI or CECO or GLDD or MYRG or PRIM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CECO Environmental Corp.
(CECO) is pulling ahead at 38. 8% versus -1. 2% for Team, Inc. (TISI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MYR Group Inc. grew EPS 311. 5% year-over-year, compared to 28. 6% for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CECO leads at 22. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TISI or CECO or GLDD or MYRG or PRIM?
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
3% net margin versus -4. 5% for Team, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GLDD leads at 14. 1% versus 1. 2% for TISI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CECO leads at 32. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TISI or CECO or GLDD or MYRG or PRIM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 98x versus Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation's 9. 93x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) trades at 15. 4x forward P/E versus 48. 8x for CECO Environmental Corp. — 33. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRIM: 48. 7% to $160. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — TISI or CECO or GLDD or MYRG or PRIM?
In this comparison, PRIM (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. TISI, CECO, GLDD, MYRG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TISI or CECO or GLDD or MYRG or PRIM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CECO Environmental Corp.
(CECO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1282% 10Y return). Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CECO: +1282%, PRIM: +402. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TISI and CECO and GLDD and MYRG and PRIM?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TISI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CECO is a small-cap high-growth stock; GLDD is a small-cap high-growth stock; MYRG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRIM is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.