Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TKC vs CSCO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
TKC vs CSCO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $5.70B | $362.87B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $212.60B | $59.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15.65B | $11.08B |
| Gross Margin | 27.6% | 64.4% |
| Operating Margin | 14.6% | 23.0% |
| Forward P/E | 0.2x | 22.1x |
| Total Debt | $104.34B | $29.64B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $68.93B | $9.47B |
TKC vs CSCO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Turkcell Iletisim H… (TKC) | 100 | 126.3 | +26.3% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) | 100 | 191.6 | +91.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TKC vs CSCO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TKC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 2.8%
- Rev growth 55.6%, EPS growth 87.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.60, Low D/E 55.8%, current ratio 1.25x
CSCO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 299.4% 10Y total return vs TKC's -0.8%
- 18.8% margin vs TKC's 7.4%
- +57.5% vs TKC's +17.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 55.6% revenue growth vs CSCO's 5.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.2x vs 22.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.8% margin vs TKC's 7.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs CSCO's 0.92, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs CSCO's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.5% vs TKC's +17.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs TKC's 3.7%, ROIC 13.0% vs 11.8% |
TKC vs CSCO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TKC vs CSCO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSCO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TKC is the larger business by revenue, generating $212.6B annually — 3.6x CSCO's $59.1B. CSCO is the more profitable business, keeping 18.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TKC's 7.4%. On growth, TKC holds the edge at +48.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $212.6B | $59.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $90.8B | $16.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $15.6B | $11.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $107M | $12.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.6% | +64.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.6% | +23.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +18.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | +21.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +48.2% | +9.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -62.3% | +29.5% |
Valuation Metrics
TKC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.0x trailing earnings, TKC trades at a 69% valuation discount to CSCO's 35.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TKC's 4.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CSCO's 26.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.7B | $362.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.5B | $383.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.96x | 35.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.24x | 22.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.19x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.77x | 26.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.55x | 6.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.38x | 7.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.85x | 27.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CSCO leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CSCO delivers a 23.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $7 for TKC. TKC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CSCO's 0.63x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.3% | +23.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.7% | +9.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.8% | +13.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.3% | +13.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.56x | 0.63x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $35.4B | $20.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $68.9B | $9.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $104.3B | $29.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.07x | 9.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CSCO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CSCO five years ago would be worth $18,971 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,225 for TKC. Over the past 12 months, CSCO leads with a +57.5% total return vs TKC's +17.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CSCO at 27.7% vs TKC's 18.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.0% | +21.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +17.6% | +57.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.5% | +108.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.3% | +89.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.8% | +299.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.3% | +27.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TKC and CSCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TKC is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CSCO's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CSCO currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs TKC's 91.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.17 | $94.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.35 | $58.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.2% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.1 | 74.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 19.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TKC and CSCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TKC as "Buy" and CSCO as "Buy". For income investors, TKC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.84% vs CSCO's 1.76%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $96.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 73 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $8.38 | $1.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +2.0% |
CSCO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TKC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
TKC vs CSCO: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TKC or CSCO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.
S. (TKC) is the stronger pick with 55. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 3% for Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. (TKC) offers the better valuation at 11. 0x trailing P/E (0. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. (TKC) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TKC or CSCO?
On trailing P/E, Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.
S. (TKC) is the cheapest at 11. 0x versus Cisco Systems, Inc. at 35. 9x. On forward P/E, Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. is actually cheaper at 0. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TKC or CSCO?
Over the past 5 years, Cisco Systems, Inc.
(CSCO) delivered a total return of +89. 7%, compared to +62. 3% for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. (TKC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSCO returned +299. 4% versus TKC's -0. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TKC or CSCO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.
S. (TKC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus Cisco Systems, Inc. 's 0. 92β — meaning CSCO is approximately 52% more volatile than TKC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. (TKC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 63% for Cisco Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TKC or CSCO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.
S. (TKC) is pulling ahead at 55. 6% versus 5. 3% for Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. grew EPS 87. 6% year-over-year, compared to 0. 4% for Cisco Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TKC leads at 15. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TKC or CSCO?
Cisco Systems, Inc.
(CSCO) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 0% net margin versus 14. 1% for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. — meaning it keeps 18. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TKC leads at 21. 1% versus 20. 8% for CSCO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CSCO leads at 64. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TKC or CSCO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.
S. (TKC) trades at 0. 2x forward P/E versus 22. 1x for Cisco Systems, Inc. — 21. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — TKC or CSCO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. (TKC) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 1. 8% for Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO).
09Is TKC or CSCO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.
S. (TKC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60), 2. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TKC: -0. 8%, CSCO: +299. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TKC and CSCO?
These companies operate in different sectors (TKC (Communication Services) and CSCO (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TKC is a small-cap high-growth stock; CSCO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.