Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TKC vs CSCO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TKC
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S.

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNYSE • TR
Market Cap$5.70B
5Y Perf.+26.3%
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$362.87B
5Y Perf.+91.6%

TKC vs CSCO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TKC logoTKC
CSCO logoCSCO
IndustryTelecommunications ServicesCommunication Equipment
Market Cap$5.70B$362.87B
Revenue (TTM)$212.60B$59.05B
Net Income (TTM)$15.65B$11.08B
Gross Margin27.6%64.4%
Operating Margin14.6%23.0%
Forward P/E0.2x22.1x
Total Debt$104.34B$29.64B
Cash & Equiv.$68.93B$9.47B

TKC vs CSCOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TKC
CSCO
StockMay 20May 26Return
Turkcell Iletisim H… (TKC)100126.3+26.3%
Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)100191.6+91.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TKC vs CSCO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TKC leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Cisco Systems, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
TKC
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S.
The Income Pick

TKC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 2.8%
  • Rev growth 55.6%, EPS growth 87.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.60, Low D/E 55.8%, current ratio 1.25x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CSCO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 299.4% 10Y total return vs TKC's -0.8%
  • 18.8% margin vs TKC's 7.4%
  • +57.5% vs TKC's +17.6%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTKC logoTKC55.6% revenue growth vs CSCO's 5.3%
ValueTKC logoTKCLower P/E (0.2x vs 22.1x)
Quality / MarginsCSCO logoCSCO18.8% margin vs TKC's 7.4%
Stability / SafetyTKC logoTKCBeta 0.60 vs CSCO's 0.92, lower leverage
DividendsTKC logoTKC2.8% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs CSCO's 1.8%
Momentum (1Y)CSCO logoCSCO+57.5% vs TKC's +17.6%
Efficiency (ROA)CSCO logoCSCO9.0% ROA vs TKC's 3.7%, ROIC 13.0% vs 11.8%

TKC vs CSCO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TKCTurkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S.

Segment breakdown not available.

CSCOCisco Systems, Inc.
FY 2025
Networking
44.5%$28.3B
Service
34.5%$22.0B
Security
12.7%$8.1B
Collaboration
6.5%$4.2B
Observability
1.7%$1.1B

TKC vs CSCO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCSCOLAGGINGTKC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CSCO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

TKC is the larger business by revenue, generating $212.6B annually — 3.6x CSCO's $59.1B. CSCO is the more profitable business, keeping 18.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TKC's 7.4%. On growth, TKC holds the edge at +48.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTKC logoTKCTurkcell Iletisim…CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$212.6B$59.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$90.8B$16.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$15.6B$11.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$107M$12.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+27.6%+64.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+14.6%+23.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+7.4%+18.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+0.1%+21.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+48.2%+9.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-62.3%+29.5%
CSCO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TKC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 11.0x trailing earnings, TKC trades at a 69% valuation discount to CSCO's 35.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TKC's 4.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CSCO's 26.2x.

MetricTKC logoTKCTurkcell Iletisim…CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…
Market CapShares × price$5.7B$362.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$6.5B$383.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS10.96x35.93x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.0.24x22.05x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.19x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple4.77x26.20x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.55x6.41x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.38x7.82x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF9.85x27.31x
TKC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CSCO leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.

CSCO delivers a 23.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $7 for TKC. TKC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CSCO's 0.63x.

MetricTKC logoTKCTurkcell Iletisim…CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.3%+23.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.7%+9.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+11.8%+13.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+13.3%+13.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–988
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.56x0.63x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$35.4B$20.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$68.9B$9.5B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$104.3B$29.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.07x9.64x
CSCO leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CSCO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CSCO five years ago would be worth $18,971 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,225 for TKC. Over the past 12 months, CSCO leads with a +57.5% total return vs TKC's +17.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CSCO at 27.7% vs TKC's 18.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTKC logoTKCTurkcell Iletisim…CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+17.0%+21.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+17.6%+57.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+65.5%+108.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+62.3%+89.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-0.8%+299.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+18.3%+27.7%
CSCO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — TKC and CSCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

TKC is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CSCO's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CSCO currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs TKC's 91.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTKC logoTKCTurkcell Iletisim…CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.60x0.92x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$7.17$94.72
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.35$58.58
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+91.2%+96.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.174.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.1M19.0M
Evenly matched — TKC and CSCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — TKC and CSCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates TKC as "Buy" and CSCO as "Buy". For income investors, TKC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.84% vs CSCO's 1.76%.

MetricTKC logoTKCTurkcell Iletisim…CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$96.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts1773
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.8%+1.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises315
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$8.38$1.61
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%+2.0%
Evenly matched — TKC and CSCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CSCO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TKC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallCisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TKC vs CSCO: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TKC or CSCO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.

S. (TKC) is the stronger pick with 55. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 3% for Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. (TKC) offers the better valuation at 11. 0x trailing P/E (0. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. (TKC) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TKC or CSCO?

On trailing P/E, Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.

S. (TKC) is the cheapest at 11. 0x versus Cisco Systems, Inc. at 35. 9x. On forward P/E, Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. is actually cheaper at 0. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TKC or CSCO?

Over the past 5 years, Cisco Systems, Inc.

(CSCO) delivered a total return of +89. 7%, compared to +62. 3% for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. (TKC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSCO returned +299. 4% versus TKC's -0. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TKC or CSCO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.

S. (TKC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus Cisco Systems, Inc. 's 0. 92β — meaning CSCO is approximately 52% more volatile than TKC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. (TKC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 63% for Cisco Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TKC or CSCO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.

S. (TKC) is pulling ahead at 55. 6% versus 5. 3% for Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. grew EPS 87. 6% year-over-year, compared to 0. 4% for Cisco Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TKC leads at 15. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TKC or CSCO?

Cisco Systems, Inc.

(CSCO) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 0% net margin versus 14. 1% for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. — meaning it keeps 18. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TKC leads at 21. 1% versus 20. 8% for CSCO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CSCO leads at 64. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TKC or CSCO more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.

S. (TKC) trades at 0. 2x forward P/E versus 22. 1x for Cisco Systems, Inc. — 21. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TKC or CSCO?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. (TKC) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 1. 8% for Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO).

09

Is TKC or CSCO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.

S. (TKC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60), 2. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TKC: -0. 8%, CSCO: +299. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TKC and CSCO?

These companies operate in different sectors (TKC (Communication Services) and CSCO (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: TKC is a small-cap high-growth stock; CSCO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

TKC

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 24%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CSCO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TKC and CSCO on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TKC: 48.2% · CSCO: 9.7%)
Net Margin>
%
(TKC: 7.4% · CSCO: 18.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(TKC: 11.0x · CSCO: 35.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.