TKC
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S.
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$5.69B
5Y Perf.+26.1%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TKC vs TEF vs T vs VZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
TEF
Telefónica, S.A.
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$24.41B
5Y Perf.-16.0%
T
AT&T Inc.
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$176.40B
5Y Perf.+8.5%
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$198.61B
5Y Perf.-17.9%
TKC vs TEF vs T vs VZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TKC | TEF | T | VZ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $5.69B | $24.41B | $176.40B | $198.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $212.60B | $38.27B | $126.52B | $138.19B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15.65B | $-2.12B | $21.41B | $17.17B |
| Gross Margin | 27.6% | 83.7% | 79.7% | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | 14.6% | 6.9% | 19.4% | 21.2% |
| Forward P/E | 0.2x | 12.5x | 10.9x | 9.5x |
| Total Debt | $104.34B | $45.02B | $173.99B | $200.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $68.93B | $8.06B | $18.23B | $19.05B |
TKC vs TEF vs T vs VZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TKC
TEF
T
VZ
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Turkcell Iletisim H… (TKC) | 100 | 126.1 | +26.1% |
| Telefónica, S.A. (TEF) | 100 | 84.0 | -16.0% |
| AT&T Inc. (T) | 100 | 108.5 | +8.5% |
| Verizon Communicati… (VZ) | 100 | 82.1 | -17.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TKC vs TEF vs T vs VZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TKC leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Telefónica, S.A. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. T also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TKC
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S.
The Growth Play
TKC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 55.6%, EPS growth 87.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.60, Low D/E 55.8%, current ratio 1.25x
- 55.6% revenue growth vs TEF's 1.6%
- Lower P/E (0.2x vs 9.5x)
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
TEF
Telefónica, S.A.
The Income Pick
TEF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.16, yield 8.5%
- Beta 0.16, yield 8.5%, current ratio 0.87x
- Beta 0.16 vs TKC's 0.60
- 8.5% yield, vs VZ's 5.8%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
T
AT&T Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
T is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 41.9% 10Y total return vs TKC's -2.0%
- 16.9% margin vs TEF's -5.5%
- 5.1% ROA vs TEF's -2.3%, ROIC 6.7% vs 2.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
The Income Angle
VZ lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: communication services exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TKC | 55.6% revenue growth vs TEF's 1.6% |
| Value | TKC | Lower P/E (0.2x vs 9.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | T | 16.9% margin vs TEF's -5.5% |
| Stability / Safety | TEF | Beta 0.16 vs TKC's 0.60 |
| Dividends | TEF | 8.5% yield, vs VZ's 5.8% |
| Momentum (1Y) | TKC | +18.0% vs TEF's -7.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | T | 5.1% ROA vs TEF's -2.3%, ROIC 6.7% vs 2.9% |
TKC vs TEF vs T vs VZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FY 2025
TKC vs TEF vs T vs VZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTKCLAGGINGVZ
Who Leads Where
TEF leads in 1 of 6 categories
TKC leads 1 • T leads 1 • VZ leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓VZVerizon Communication…
0leads
TAT&T Inc.
1leads
TEFTelefónica, S.A.
1leads
TKCTurkcell Iletisim Hiz…
1leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs TEFvs TMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TEF4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
TKC5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
T3/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — T and VZ each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TKC is the larger business by revenue, generating $212.6B annually — 5.6x TEF's $38.3B. T is the more profitable business, keeping 16.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TEF's -5.5%. On growth, TKC holds the edge at +48.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TKCTurkcell Iletisim… | TEFTelefónica, S.A. | TAT&T Inc. | VZVerizon Communica… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $212.6B | $38.3B | $126.5B | $138.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $90.8B | $12.3B | $45.1B | $47.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $15.6B | -$2.1B | $21.4B | $17.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $107M | $4.0B | $10.6B | $19.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.6% | +83.7% | +79.7% | +55.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.6% | +6.9% | +19.4% | +21.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | -5.5% | +16.9% | +12.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | +10.5% | +8.4% | +14.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +48.2% | -6.6% | +2.9% | +2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -62.3% | — | -11.5% | -53.4% |
Evenly matched — T and VZ each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
TEF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.3x trailing earnings, T trades at a 28% valuation discount to VZ's 11.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TKC's 4.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VZ's 8.0x.
| Metric | TKCTurkcell Iletisim… | TEFTelefónica, S.A. | TAT&T Inc. | VZVerizon Communica… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.7B | $24.4B | $176.4B | $198.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.5B | $68.0B | $332.2B | $380.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.95x | -65.09x | 8.31x | 11.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.24x | 12.47x | 10.93x | 9.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.19x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.77x | 5.15x | 7.37x | 7.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.54x | 0.50x | 1.40x | 1.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.38x | 0.91x | 1.41x | 1.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.84x | 3.98x | 9.07x | 9.87x |
TEF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TKC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
T delivers a 16.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-10 for TEF. TKC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TEF's 1.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TKC scores 8/9 vs VZ's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | TKCTurkcell Iletisim… | TEFTelefónica, S.A. | TAT&T Inc. | VZVerizon Communica… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.3% | -9.9% | +16.8% | +16.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.7% | -2.3% | +5.1% | +4.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.8% | +2.9% | +6.7% | +8.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.3% | +3.1% | +6.8% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.56x | 1.98x | 1.35x | 1.90x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $35.4B | $37.0B | $155.8B | $181.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $68.9B | $8.1B | $18.2B | $19.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $104.3B | $45.0B | $174.0B | $200.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.07x | 0.80x | 4.97x | 4.39x |
TKC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
T leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TKC five years ago would be worth $15,853 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,277 for VZ. Over the past 12 months, TKC leads with a +18.0% total return vs TEF's -7.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors T at 18.6% vs TEF's 6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TKCTurkcell Iletisim… | TEFTelefónica, S.A. | TAT&T Inc. | VZVerizon Communica… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.8% | +8.3% | +5.1% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.0% | -7.9% | -6.2% | +13.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.3% | +21.5% | +67.0% | +45.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.5% | +25.1% | +29.9% | +2.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.0% | -16.7% | +41.9% | +41.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.2% | +6.7% | +18.6% | +13.4% |
T leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — T and VZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
T is the less volatile stock with a -0.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TKC's 0.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VZ currently trades 91.1% from its 52-week high vs TEF's 75.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TKCTurkcell Iletisim… | TEFTelefónica, S.A. | TAT&T Inc. | VZVerizon Communica… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 0.16x | -0.26x | -0.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.17 | $5.72 | $29.79 | $51.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.35 | $3.67 | $22.95 | $10.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.1% | +75.7% | +84.8% | +91.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.1 | 70.2 | 38.9 | 49.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 516K | 33.7M | 24.3M |
Evenly matched — T and VZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TEF and VZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TKC as "Buy", TEF as "Buy", T as "Hold", VZ as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.5% upside for T (target: $29) vs 9.5% for VZ (target: $52). For income investors, TEF offers the higher dividend yield at 8.50% vs TKC's 2.84%.
| Metric | TKCTurkcell Iletisim… | TEFTelefónica, S.A. | TAT&T Inc. | VZVerizon Communica… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $29.42 | $51.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 20 | 62 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +8.5% | +4.5% | +5.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 | 2 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $8.38 | $0.31 | $1.14 | $2.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | +2.6% | 0.0% |
Evenly matched — TEF and VZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
TEF leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). TKC leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
Best OverallTurkcell Iletisim Hizmetler… (TKC)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TKC vs TEF vs T vs VZ: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TKC or TEF or T or VZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.
S. (TKC) is the stronger pick with 55. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 6% for Telefónica, S. A. (TEF). AT&T Inc. (T) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. (TKC) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TKC or TEF or T or VZ?
On trailing P/E, AT&T Inc.
(T) is the cheapest at 8. 3x versus Verizon Communications Inc. at 11. 6x. On forward P/E, Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. is actually cheaper at 0. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TKC or TEF or T or VZ?
Over the past 5 years, Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.
S. (TKC) delivered a total return of +58. 5%, compared to +2. 8% for Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: T returned +41. 9% versus TEF's -16. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TKC or TEF or T or VZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AT&T Inc.
(T) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 26β versus Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. 's 0. 60β — meaning TKC is approximately -333% more volatile than T relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. (TKC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 198% for Telefónica, S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TKC or TEF or T or VZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.
S. (TKC) is pulling ahead at 55. 6% versus 1. 6% for Telefónica, S. A. (TEF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AT&T Inc. grew EPS 104. 0% year-over-year, compared to -2. 2% for Verizon Communications Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TKC leads at 15. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TKC or TEF or T or VZ?
AT&T Inc.
(T) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 4% net margin versus -0. 1% for Telefónica, S. A. — meaning it keeps 17. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VZ leads at 21. 2% versus 5. 8% for TEF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — T leads at 79. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TKC or TEF or T or VZ more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.
S. (TKC) trades at 0. 2x forward P/E versus 12. 5x for Telefónica, S. A. — 12. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for T: 16. 5% to $29. 42.
08Which pays a better dividend — TKC or TEF or T or VZ?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Telefónica, S. A. (TEF) offers the highest yield at 8. 5%, versus 2. 8% for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. (TKC).
09Is TKC or TEF or T or VZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AT&T Inc.
(T) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 26), 4. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (T: +41. 9%, TKC: -2. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TKC and TEF and T and VZ?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TKC is a small-cap high-growth stock; TEF is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; T is a mid-cap deep-value stock; VZ is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 50%
- Dividend Yield > 3.3%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 10%
- Dividend Yield > 1.8%
Revenue Growth>
%
(TKC: 48.2% · TEF: -6.6%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.