TLRY vs SMG

For growth investors, Tilray Brands, Inc.

(TLRY) is the stronger pick with 4. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG). The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) offers the better valuation at 25. 3x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Tilray Brands, Inc.

(TLRY) delivered a total return of -65. 0%, compared to -69. 1% for The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMG returned +34. 9% versus TLRY's -74. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

10β versus Tilray Brands, Inc. 's 2. 03β — meaning TLRY is approximately 84% more volatile than SMG relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tilray Brands, Inc.

(TLRY) is pulling ahead at 4. 8% versus -3. 9% for The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company grew EPS 504. 9% year-over-year, compared to -651. 7% for Tilray Brands, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TLRY leads at 12. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) is the more profitable company, earning 4.

3% net margin versus -266. 3% for Tilray Brands, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMG leads at 10. 5% versus -277. 9% for TLRY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMG leads at 30. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TLRY: 76.

7% to $10. 00.

In this comparison, SMG (4.

2% yield) pays a dividend. TLRY does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

10), 4. 2% yield). Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMG: +34. 9%, TLRY: -74. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (TLRY (Healthcare) and SMG (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: TLRY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMG is a small-cap income-oriented stock. SMG pays a dividend while TLRY does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.