TLSI vs ANGO

For growth investors, TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc.

(TLSI) is the stronger pick with 53. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 8% for AngioDynamics, Inc. (ANGO). Analysts rate TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc. (TLSI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, AngioDynamics, Inc.

(ANGO) delivered a total return of -51. 6%, compared to -54. 3% for TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc. (TLSI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ANGO returned -9. 7% versus TLSI's -57. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AngioDynamics, Inc.

(ANGO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 26β versus TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc. 's 1. 36β — meaning TLSI is approximately 9% more volatile than ANGO relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc.

(TLSI) is pulling ahead at 53. 4% versus -3. 8% for AngioDynamics, Inc. (ANGO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AngioDynamics, Inc. grew EPS 81. 9% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TLSI leads at 53. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

AngioDynamics, Inc.

(ANGO) is the more profitable company, earning -11. 6% net margin versus -154. 3% for TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps -11. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ANGO leads at -13. 7% versus -59. 7% for TLSI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TLSI leads at 84. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, AngioDynamics, Inc.

(ANGO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ANGO: -9. 7%, TLSI: -57. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TLSI is a small-cap high-growth stock; ANGO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.