TMDE vs AMPY

For growth investors, TMD Energy Limited (TMDE) is the stronger pick with 8.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 6% for Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY). Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY) offers the better valuation at 5. 3x trailing P/E (20. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Amplify Energy Corp.

(AMPY) is the cheapest at 5. 3x versus TMD Energy Limited at 12. 9x.

Over the past 5 years, Amplify Energy Corp.

(AMPY) delivered a total return of +81. 0%, compared to -71. 1% for TMD Energy Limited (TMDE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMPY returned +904. 1% versus TMDE's -71. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TMD Energy Limited (TMDE) is the lower-risk stock at -1.

99β versus Amplify Energy Corp. 's -0. 19β — meaning AMPY is approximately -91% more volatile than TMDE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 4% for TMD Energy Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TMD Energy Limited (TMDE) is pulling ahead at 8.

8% versus -10. 6% for Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amplify Energy Corp. grew EPS 232. 3% year-over-year, compared to -5. 9% for TMD Energy Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Amplify Energy Corp.

(AMPY) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 7% net margin versus 0. 3% for TMD Energy Limited — meaning it keeps 16. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMPY leads at 29. 2% versus 0. 9% for TMDE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMPY leads at 93. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, TMD Energy Limited (TMDE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1.

99)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TMDE: -71. 1%, AMPY: +904. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.