Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TMDX vs ATRC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
TMDX vs ATRC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $2.52B | $1.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $636M | $552M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $172M | $-5M |
| Gross Margin | 59.1% | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | 14.9% | -0.4% |
| Forward P/E | 29.9x | 370.7x |
| Total Debt | $470M | $88M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $488M | $167M |
TMDX vs ATRC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TransMedics Group, … (TMDX) | 100 | 551.9 | +451.9% |
| AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC) | 100 | 58.1 | -41.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TMDX vs ATRC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TMDX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 37.1%, EPS growth 382.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 86.4%
- 226.0% 10Y total return vs ATRC's 95.1%
- 37.1% revenue growth vs ATRC's 14.9%
ATRC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.03
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 17.9%, current ratio 3.96x
- Beta 1.03, current ratio 3.96x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.1% revenue growth vs ATRC's 14.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (29.9x vs 370.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.0% margin vs ATRC's -0.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.03 vs TMDX's 1.59, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -8.3% vs TMDX's -23.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.8% ROA vs ATRC's -0.7%, ROIC 18.8% vs -0.6% |
TMDX vs ATRC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TMDX vs ATRC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TMDX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TMDX and ATRC operate at a comparable scale, with $636M and $552M in trailing revenue. TMDX is the more profitable business, keeping 27.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATRC's -0.8%. On growth, TMDX holds the edge at +21.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $636M | $552M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $115M | $13M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $172M | -$5M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $151M | $54M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.1% | +75.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | -0.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.0% | -0.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.8% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.2% | +14.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -71.4% | +101.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TMDX and ATRC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, TMDX's 18.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ATRC's 77.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.5B | $1.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.97x | -115.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 29.86x | 370.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.42x | 77.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.16x | 2.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.25x | 2.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.86x | 29.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TMDX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TMDX delivers a 41.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $-1 for ATRC. ATRC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TMDX's 0.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TMDX scores 7/9 vs ATRC's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +41.9% | -1.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +15.8% | -0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.8% | -0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.6% | -0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.99x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$19M | -$79M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $488M | $167M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $470M | $88M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 33.15x | 0.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TMDX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TMDX five years ago would be worth $30,074 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,579 for ATRC. Over the past 12 months, ATRC leads with a -8.3% total return vs TMDX's -23.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TMDX at 0.9% vs ATRC's -16.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -40.6% | -29.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -23.9% | -8.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.8% | -41.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +200.7% | -64.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +226.0% | +95.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.9% | -16.5% |
Risk & Volatility
ATRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATRC is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TMDX's 1.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ATRC currently trades 64.4% from its 52-week high vs TMDX's 46.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.59x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $156.00 | $43.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $70.00 | $26.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +46.7% | +64.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 21.8 | 45.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 669K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TMDX as "Buy" and ATRC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 98.6% upside for TMDX (target: $145) vs 82.3% for ATRC (target: $51).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $144.75 | $50.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.8% |
TMDX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ATRC leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
TMDX vs ATRC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TMDX or ATRC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) is the stronger pick with 37. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 9% for AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC). TransMedics Group, Inc. (TMDX) offers the better valuation at 15. 0x trailing P/E (29. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TransMedics Group, Inc. (TMDX) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TMDX or ATRC?
On forward P/E, TransMedics Group, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 29. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TMDX or ATRC?
Over the past 5 years, TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) delivered a total return of +200. 7%, compared to -64. 2% for AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TMDX returned +226. 0% versus ATRC's +95. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TMDX or ATRC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AtriCure, Inc.
(ATRC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus TransMedics Group, Inc. 's 1. 59β — meaning TMDX is approximately 55% more volatile than ATRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 99% for TransMedics Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TMDX or ATRC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) is pulling ahead at 37. 1% versus 14. 9% for AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TransMedics Group, Inc. grew EPS 382. 2% year-over-year, compared to 74. 7% for AtriCure, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TMDX leads at 86. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TMDX or ATRC?
TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus -2. 1% for AtriCure, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TMDX leads at 17. 9% versus -0. 6% for ATRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATRC leads at 74. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TMDX or ATRC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) trades at 29. 9x forward P/E versus 370. 7x for AtriCure, Inc. — 340. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TMDX: 98. 6% to $144. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — TMDX or ATRC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TMDX or ATRC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AtriCure, Inc.
(ATRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03)). TransMedics Group, Inc. (TMDX) carries a higher beta of 1. 59 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATRC: +95. 1%, TMDX: +226. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TMDX and ATRC?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TMDX is a small-cap high-growth stock; ATRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.