Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TNC vs SPIR vs ASTS vs NDSN vs ITW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Communication Equipment
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
TNC vs SPIR vs ASTS vs NDSN vs ITW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Specialty Business Services | Communication Equipment | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $1.57B | $529.86B | $19.12B | $15.83B | $73.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.21B | $72M | $71M | $2.85B | $16.22B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $31M | $-25.02B | $-342M | $523M | $3.13B |
| Gross Margin | 39.5% | 40.8% | 53.4% | 55.2% | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | 4.8% | -121.4% | -405.7% | 25.9% | 26.4% |
| Forward P/E | 17.4x | 10.0x | — | 24.9x | 22.7x |
| Total Debt | $345M | $8.76B | $32M | $2.09B | $8.97B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $106M | $24.81B | $2.34B | $108M | $851M |
TNC vs SPIR vs ASTS vs NDSN vs ITW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tennant Company (TNC) | 100 | 129.5 | +29.5% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 20.5 | -79.5% |
| AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS) | 100 | 645.4 | +545.4% |
| Nordson Corporation (NDSN) | 100 | 139.4 | +39.4% |
| Illinois Tool Works… (ITW) | 100 | 121.1 | +21.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TNC vs SPIR vs ASTS vs NDSN vs ITW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TNC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 57.1%, current ratio 2.05x
- Beta 0.99, yield 1.4%, current ratio 2.05x
Among these 5 stocks, SPIR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ASTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs NDSN's 298.2%
- 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
- +158.1% vs ITW's +9.0%
NDSN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.68 vs TNC's 3.20
- PEG 1.68 vs 2.36
- 1.1% yield, 37-year raise streak, vs ITW's 2.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
ITW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 2.4%
- 19.3% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
- Beta 0.67 vs SPIR's 2.93
- 19.4% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC 29.0% vs -0.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2% | |
| Value | PEG 1.68 vs 2.36 | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.3% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs SPIR's 2.93 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 37-year raise streak, vs ITW's 2.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +158.1% vs ITW's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.4% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC 29.0% vs -0.1% |
TNC vs SPIR vs ASTS vs NDSN vs ITW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TNC vs SPIR vs ASTS vs NDSN vs ITW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TNC leads in 1 of 6 categories
ITW leads 1 • ASTS leads 1 • SPIR leads 0 • NDSN leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NDSN and ITW each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ITW is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.2B annually — 228.7x ASTS's $71M. ITW is the more profitable business, keeping 19.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +27.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $72M | $71M | $2.8B | $16.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $118M | -$74M | -$237M | $851M | $4.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $31M | -$25.0B | -$342M | $523M | $3.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $16M | -$16.2B | -$1.1B | $646M | $2.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.5% | +40.8% | +53.4% | +55.2% | +44.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | -121.4% | -4.1% | +25.9% | +26.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | -349.6% | -4.8% | +18.4% | +19.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | -227.0% | -16.0% | +22.7% | +13.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | -26.9% | +27.3% | +8.8% | +4.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -98.4% | +59.5% | -55.6% | +44.2% | +11.8% |
Valuation Metrics
TNC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.0x trailing earnings, SPIR trades at a 73% valuation discount to TNC's 36.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NDSN offers better value at 2.26x vs TNC's 6.76x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $529.9B | $19.1B | $15.8B | $73.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $513.8B | $16.8B | $17.8B | $81.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 36.86x | 10.01x | -48.76x | 33.39x | 24.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.43x | — | — | 24.86x | 22.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 6.76x | — | — | 2.26x | 2.53x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.91x | — | — | 20.66x | 17.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.30x | 7405.21x | 269.64x | 5.67x | 4.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.68x | 4.56x | 5.68x | 5.31x | 23.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 36.18x | — | — | 23.94x | 27.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ITW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ITW delivers a 97.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $97 in annual profit, vs $-88 for SPIR. ASTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ITW's 2.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NDSN scores 6/9 vs ITW's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.1% | -88.4% | -21.1% | +16.8% | +97.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.5% | -47.3% | -12.6% | +10.2% | +19.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.5% | -0.1% | -47.1% | +10.5% | +29.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.7% | -0.1% | -10.0% | +13.4% | +38.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.57x | 0.08x | 0.01x | 0.69x | 2.78x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $238M | -$16.1B | -$2.3B | $2.0B | $8.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $106M | $24.8B | $2.3B | $108M | $851M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $345M | $8.8B | $32M | $2.1B | $9.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.54x | 9.20x | -21.20x | 7.44x | 14.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASTS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASTS five years ago would be worth $78,824 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,035 for SPIR. Over the past 12 months, ASTS leads with a +158.1% total return vs ITW's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASTS at 134.8% vs TNC's 4.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.0% | +106.4% | -21.7% | +18.2% | +3.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.6% | +73.1% | +158.1% | +51.8% | +9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.5% | +198.1% | +1194.0% | +34.5% | +19.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.3% | -79.6% | +688.2% | +42.4% | +18.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.5% | -78.8% | +568.8% | +298.2% | +189.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.9% | +43.9% | +134.8% | +10.4% | +6.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TNC and ITW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ITW is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TNC currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs ASTS's 50.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.99x | 2.93x | 2.82x | 1.05x | 0.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $88.86 | $23.59 | $129.89 | $305.28 | $303.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $60.18 | $6.60 | $22.47 | $188.22 | $236.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.9% | +68.3% | +50.3% | +93.1% | +84.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 76.7 | 55.5 | 41.8 | 59.3 | 45.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 317K | 1.6M | 14.9M | 306K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NDSN and ITW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TNC as "Buy", SPIR as "Buy", ASTS as "Buy", NDSN as "Buy", ITW as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 60.9% upside for TNC (target: $140) vs 7.0% for SPIR (target: $17). For income investors, ITW offers the higher dividend yield at 2.39% vs NDSN's 1.11%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $140.00 | $17.25 | $103.65 | $311.50 | $273.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 12 | 7 | 20 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | — | — | +1.1% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | — | — | 37 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.18 | — | — | $3.15 | $6.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.9% | +2.0% |
TNC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). ITW leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
TNC vs SPIR vs ASTS vs NDSN vs ITW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TNC or SPIR or ASTS or NDSN or ITW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is the stronger pick with 1505% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tennant Company (TNC) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TNC or SPIR or ASTS or NDSN or ITW?
On trailing P/E, Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the cheapest at 10. 0x versus Tennant Company at 36. 9x. On forward P/E, Tennant Company is actually cheaper at 17. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Nordson Corporation wins at 1. 68x versus Tennant Company's 3. 20x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TNC or SPIR or ASTS or NDSN or ITW?
Over the past 5 years, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) delivered a total return of +688. 2%, compared to -79. 6% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASTS returned +568. 8% versus SPIR's -78. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TNC or SPIR or ASTS or NDSN or ITW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Illinois Tool Works Inc.
(ITW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 67β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 338% more volatile than ITW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for Illinois Tool Works Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TNC or SPIR or ASTS or NDSN or ITW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is pulling ahead at 1505% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to -46. 1% for Tennant Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASTS leads at 72. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TNC or SPIR or ASTS or NDSN or ITW?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus -482. 2% for AST SpaceMobile, Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ITW leads at 26. 3% versus -405. 7% for ASTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NDSN leads at 55. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TNC or SPIR or ASTS or NDSN or ITW more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Nordson Corporation (NDSN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 68x versus Tennant Company's 3. 20x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Tennant Company (TNC) trades at 17. 4x forward P/E versus 24. 9x for Nordson Corporation — 7. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TNC: 60. 9% to $140. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TNC or SPIR or ASTS or NDSN or ITW?
In this comparison, ITW (2.
4% yield), TNC (1. 4% yield), NDSN (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. SPIR, ASTS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TNC or SPIR or ASTS or NDSN or ITW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Illinois Tool Works Inc.
(ITW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 67), 2. 4% yield, +189. 4% 10Y return). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ITW: +189. 4%, SPIR: -78. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TNC and SPIR and ASTS and NDSN and ITW?
These companies operate in different sectors (TNC (Industrials) and SPIR (Industrials) and ASTS (Technology) and NDSN (Industrials) and ITW (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TNC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NDSN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ITW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. TNC, NDSN, ITW pay a dividend while SPIR, ASTS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.