Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TNC vs TTNP vs NDSN vs NKTR vs ITW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Industrial - Machinery
Biotechnology
Industrial - Machinery
TNC vs TTNP vs NDSN vs NKTR vs ITW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Biotechnology | Industrial - Machinery | Biotechnology | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $1.57B | $4M | $15.83B | $1.69B | $73.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.21B | $10K | $2.85B | $55M | $16.22B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $31M | $-3M | $523M | $-164M | $3.13B |
| Gross Margin | 39.5% | 50.0% | 55.2% | 99.6% | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | 4.8% | -261.1% | 25.9% | -237.9% | 26.4% |
| Forward P/E | 17.4x | — | 24.8x | — | 22.6x |
| Total Debt | $345M | $0.00 | $2.09B | $149M | $8.97B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $106M | $3M | $108M | $15M | $851M |
TNC vs TTNP vs NDSN vs NKTR vs ITW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tennant Company (TNC) | 100 | 136.3 | +36.3% |
| Titan Pharmaceutica… (TTNP) | 100 | 1.8 | -98.2% |
| Nordson Corporation (NDSN) | 100 | 150.5 | +50.5% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 25.2 | -74.8% |
| Illinois Tool Works… (ITW) | 100 | 147.7 | +47.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TNC vs TTNP vs NDSN vs NKTR vs ITW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TNC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 57.1%, current ratio 2.05x
Among these 5 stocks, TTNP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NDSN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.8%, EPS growth 4.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.5%
- 298.2% 10Y total return vs ITW's 189.4%
- PEG 1.68 vs TNC's 3.20
- 3.8% revenue growth vs TTNP's -100.0%
NKTR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +8.2% vs TTNP's -23.2%
ITW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 2.4%
- Beta 0.67, yield 2.4%, current ratio 1.21x
- 19.3% margin vs TTNP's -280.5%
- Beta 0.67 vs NKTR's 1.85
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.8% revenue growth vs TTNP's -100.0% | |
| Value | PEG 1.68 vs 2.35 | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.3% margin vs TTNP's -280.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs NKTR's 1.85 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 37-year raise streak, vs ITW's 2.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.2% vs TTNP's -23.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.4% ROA vs TTNP's -91.9%, ROIC 29.0% vs -122.1% |
TNC vs TTNP vs NDSN vs NKTR vs ITW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TNC vs TTNP vs NDSN vs NKTR vs ITW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TNC leads in 1 of 6 categories
ITW leads 1 • NKTR leads 1 • TTNP leads 0 • NDSN leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NDSN and ITW each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ITW is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.2B annually — 1622100.0x TTNP's $10,000. ITW is the more profitable business, keeping 19.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TTNP's -280.5%. On growth, NDSN holds the edge at +8.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $10,000 | $2.8B | $55M | $16.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $118M | -$3M | $851M | -$130M | $4.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $31M | -$3M | $523M | -$164M | $3.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $16M | -$3M | $646M | -$209M | $2.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.5% | +50.0% | +55.2% | +99.6% | +44.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | -261.1% | +25.9% | -2.4% | +26.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | -280.5% | +18.4% | -3.0% | +19.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | -274.6% | +22.7% | -3.8% | +13.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | — | +8.8% | -25.3% | +4.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -98.4% | +71.6% | +44.2% | -4.5% | +11.8% |
Valuation Metrics
TNC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.4x trailing earnings, ITW trades at a 34% valuation discount to TNC's 36.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NDSN offers better value at 2.26x vs TNC's 6.76x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $4M | $15.8B | $1.7B | $73.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $1M | $17.8B | $1.8B | $81.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 36.86x | -0.59x | 33.39x | -8.57x | 24.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.43x | — | 24.80x | — | 22.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 6.76x | — | 2.26x | — | 2.53x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.91x | — | 20.66x | — | 17.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.30x | — | 5.67x | 30.64x | 4.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.68x | 1.13x | 5.31x | 15.66x | 23.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 36.18x | — | 23.94x | — | 27.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ITW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ITW delivers a 97.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $97 in annual profit, vs $-4 for NKTR. TNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.57x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ITW's 2.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NDSN scores 6/9 vs NKTR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.1% | -100.6% | +16.8% | -4.0% | +97.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.5% | -91.9% | +10.2% | -62.8% | +19.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.5% | -122.1% | +10.5% | -57.2% | +29.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.7% | -100.4% | +13.4% | -55.7% | +38.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.57x | — | 0.69x | 1.66x | 2.78x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $238M | -$3M | $2.0B | $134M | $8.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $106M | $3M | $108M | $15M | $851M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $345M | $0 | $2.1B | $149M | $9.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.54x | — | 7.44x | -4.74x | 14.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NDSN five years ago would be worth $14,244 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $655 for TTNP. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +818.2% total return vs TTNP's -23.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 93.3% vs TTNP's -41.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.0% | — | +18.2% | +92.0% | +3.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.6% | -23.2% | +51.8% | +818.2% | +9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.5% | -80.0% | +34.5% | +621.8% | +19.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.3% | -93.4% | +42.4% | -72.3% | +18.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.5% | -100.0% | +298.2% | -59.1% | +189.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.9% | -41.5% | +10.4% | +93.3% | +6.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TNC and ITW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ITW is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKTR's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TNC currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs TTNP's 7.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 1.67x | 1.04x | 1.85x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $88.86 | $39.00 | $305.28 | $109.00 | $303.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $60.18 | $2.81 | $188.22 | $7.99 | $236.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.9% | +7.9% | +93.1% | +76.5% | +84.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 76.7 | 42.6 | 59.3 | 53.4 | 45.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 317K | 3K | 306K | 991K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NDSN and ITW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TNC as "Buy", NDSN as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy", ITW as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 60.9% upside for TNC (target: $140) vs 6.1% for ITW (target: $271). For income investors, ITW offers the higher dividend yield at 2.39% vs NDSN's 1.11%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $140.00 | — | $311.50 | $132.83 | $271.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | — | 20 | 33 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | — | +1.1% | — | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 1 | 37 | — | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.18 | — | $3.15 | — | $6.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.6% | 0.0% | +1.9% | 0.0% | +2.0% |
TNC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). ITW leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
TNC vs TTNP vs NDSN vs NKTR vs ITW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TNC or TTNP or NDSN or NKTR or ITW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nordson Corporation (NDSN) is the stronger pick with 3.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TTNP). Illinois Tool Works Inc. (ITW) offers the better valuation at 24. 4x trailing P/E (22. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tennant Company (TNC) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TNC or TTNP or NDSN or NKTR or ITW?
On trailing P/E, Illinois Tool Works Inc.
(ITW) is the cheapest at 24. 4x versus Tennant Company at 36. 9x. On forward P/E, Tennant Company is actually cheaper at 17. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Nordson Corporation wins at 1. 68x versus Tennant Company's 3. 20x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TNC or TTNP or NDSN or NKTR or ITW?
Over the past 5 years, Nordson Corporation (NDSN) delivered a total return of +42.
4%, compared to -93. 4% for Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TTNP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NDSN returned +297. 4% versus TTNP's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TNC or TTNP or NDSN or NKTR or ITW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Illinois Tool Works Inc.
(ITW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 68β versus Nektar Therapeutics's 1. 85β — meaning NKTR is approximately 171% more volatile than ITW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tennant Company (TNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 57% versus 3% for Illinois Tool Works Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TNC or TTNP or NDSN or NKTR or ITW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nordson Corporation (NDSN) is pulling ahead at 3.
8% versus -100. 0% for Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TTNP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 29. 4% year-over-year, compared to -46. 1% for Tennant Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, TNC leads at 3. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TNC or TTNP or NDSN or NKTR or ITW?
Illinois Tool Works Inc.
(ITW) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 1% net margin versus -280. 5% for Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ITW leads at 26. 3% versus -261. 1% for TTNP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TNC or TTNP or NDSN or NKTR or ITW more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Nordson Corporation (NDSN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 68x versus Tennant Company's 3. 20x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Tennant Company (TNC) trades at 17. 4x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Nordson Corporation — 7. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TNC: 60. 9% to $140. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TNC or TTNP or NDSN or NKTR or ITW?
In this comparison, ITW (2.
4% yield), TNC (1. 4% yield), NDSN (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. TTNP, NKTR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TNC or TTNP or NDSN or NKTR or ITW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Illinois Tool Works Inc.
(ITW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 68), 2. 4% yield, +188. 6% 10Y return). Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ITW: +188. 6%, NKTR: -59. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TNC and TTNP and NDSN and NKTR and ITW?
These companies operate in different sectors (TNC (Industrials) and TTNP (Healthcare) and NDSN (Industrials) and NKTR (Healthcare) and ITW (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
TNC, NDSN, ITW pay a dividend while TTNP, NKTR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.