Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TNK vs INSW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
TNK vs INSW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $2.76B | $4.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $952M | $843M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $351M | $309M |
| Gross Margin | 27.5% | 47.2% |
| Operating Margin | 27.5% | 42.4% |
| Forward P/E | 5.9x | 8.1x |
| Total Debt | $55M | $576M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $831M | $117M |
TNK vs INSW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) | 100 | 456.7 | +356.7% |
| International Seawa… (INSW) | 100 | 378.2 | +278.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TNK vs INSW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TNK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 2.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 2.7%, current ratio 7.98x
- Beta 0.35, yield 2.5%, current ratio 7.98x
INSW is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -11.4%, EPS growth -25.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.8%
- 9.7% 10Y total return vs TNK's 200.7%
- -11.4% revenue growth vs TNK's -22.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -11.4% revenue growth vs TNK's -22.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.9x vs 8.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.9% margin vs INSW's 36.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs INSW's 0.43, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.4% yield, vs TNK's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +146.7% vs TNK's +76.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.7% ROA vs INSW's 11.8%, ROIC 12.5% vs 9.4% |
TNK vs INSW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TNK vs INSW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INSW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TNK and INSW operate at a comparable scale, with $952M and $843M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 36.9% (TNK) to 36.7% (INSW). On growth, INSW holds the edge at +37.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $952M | $843M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $348M | $521M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $351M | $309M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $113M | $38M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.5% | +47.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.5% | +42.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +36.9% | +36.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +4.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -26.4% | +37.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +46.0% | +2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
TNK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.9x trailing earnings, TNK trades at a 43% valuation discount to INSW's 13.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TNK's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than INSW's 10.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.8B | $4.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $4.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.86x | 13.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.86x | 8.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.25x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.58x | 10.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.90x | 5.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.35x | 2.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.50x | 111.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TNK leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TNK delivers a 17.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $16 for INSW. TNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INSW's 0.29x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INSW scores 6/9 vs TNK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.2% | +16.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +15.7% | +11.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.5% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.9% | +12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$776M | $459M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $831M | $117M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $55M | $576M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 109.95x | 3.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TNK five years ago would be worth $61,387 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $52,215 for INSW. Over the past 12 months, INSW leads with a +146.7% total return vs TNK's +76.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INSW at 38.9% vs TNK's 32.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +54.6% | +87.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +76.4% | +146.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +131.4% | +167.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +513.9% | +422.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +200.7% | +970.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.3% | +38.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TNK and INSW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TNK is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INSW's 0.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.35x | 0.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $83.54 | $88.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $41.05 | $35.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.0% | +96.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.1 | 75.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 547K | 585K |
Analyst Outlook
INSW leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TNK as "Buy" and INSW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.4% upside for TNK (target: $90) vs -2.8% for INSW (target: $83). For income investors, INSW offers the higher dividend yield at 3.40% vs TNK's 2.50%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $90.00 | $83.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.5% | +3.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.98 | $2.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
INSW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). TNK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
TNK vs INSW: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TNK or INSW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the stronger pick with -11. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 6% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK). Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) offers the better valuation at 7. 9x trailing P/E (5. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TNK or INSW?
On trailing P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is the cheapest at 7. 9x versus International Seaways, Inc. at 13. 8x. On forward P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd. is actually cheaper at 5. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TNK or INSW?
Over the past 5 years, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) delivered a total return of +513. 9%, compared to +422. 1% for International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +970. 0% versus TNK's +200. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TNK or INSW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus International Seaways, Inc. 's 0. 43β — meaning INSW is approximately 22% more volatile than TNK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 29% for International Seaways, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TNK or INSW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is pulling ahead at -11. 4% versus -22. 6% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teekay Tankers Ltd. grew EPS -13. 0% year-over-year, compared to -25. 7% for International Seaways, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, INSW leads at -0. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TNK or INSW?
Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 9% net margin versus 36. 7% for International Seaways, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INSW leads at 36. 3% versus 22. 6% for TNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INSW leads at 42. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TNK or INSW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) trades at 5. 9x forward P/E versus 8. 1x for International Seaways, Inc. — 2. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TNK: 13. 4% to $90. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TNK or INSW?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) offers the highest yield at 3. 4%, versus 2. 5% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK).
09Is TNK or INSW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 43), 3. 4% yield, +970. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +970. 0%, TNK: +200. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TNK and INSW?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.