TNL
Travel + Leisure Co.
Travel Services
Market Cap$4.06B
5Y Perf.+104.3%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TNL vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
Specialty Retail
Market Cap$2.96T
5Y Perf.+125.1%
TNL vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TNL | AMZN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Travel Services | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $4.06B | $2.96T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.05B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $237M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 43.2% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | 15.3% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 8.8x | 35.3x |
| Total Debt | $4.91B | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $253M | $86.81B |
TNL vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TNL
AMZN
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Travel + Leisure Co. (TNL) | 100 | 204.3 | +104.3% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 225.1 | +125.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TNL vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: AMZN leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Travel + Leisure Co. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TNL
Travel + Leisure Co.
The Income Pick
TNL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.31, yield 3.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.31, current ratio 1.64x
- Beta 1.31, yield 3.4%, current ratio 1.64x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
The Growth Play
AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 29.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs TNL's 156.2%
- 12.4% revenue growth vs TNL's 4.1%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | AMZN | 12.4% revenue growth vs TNL's 4.1% |
| Value | TNL | Lower P/E (8.8x vs 35.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | AMZN | 12.2% margin vs TNL's 5.9% |
| Stability / Safety | TNL | Beta 1.31 vs AMZN's 1.51 |
| Dividends | TNL | 3.4% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | AMZN | +48.6% vs TNL's +44.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AMZN | 11.5% ROA vs TNL's 3.5%, ROIC 14.7% vs 13.0% |
TNL vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
TNL vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLAMZNLAGGINGTNL
TNLTravel + Leisure Co.
1leads
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs TNLMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
AMZN4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TNL5/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
AMZN4/6
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
AMZN6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 183.4x TNL's $4.0B. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TNL's 5.9%. On growth, AMZN holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TNLTravel + Leisure … | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.0B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $744M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $237M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $737M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.2% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.2% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.0% | +74.8% |
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
TNL leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.9x trailing earnings, TNL trades at a 51% valuation discount to AMZN's 38.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TNL's 10.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMZN's 20.7x.
| Metric | TNLTravel + Leisure … | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.1B | $2.96T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.7B | $3.02T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.89x | 38.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.78x | 35.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.37x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.36x | 20.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.01x | 4.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 7.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.76x | 384.26x |
TNL leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | TNLTravel + Leisure … | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.5% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.0% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.6% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.7B | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $253M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.9B | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.56x | 39.96x |
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,632 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,739 for TNL. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +48.6% total return vs TNL's +44.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 37.5% vs TNL's 25.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TNLTravel + Leisure … | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.0% | +21.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.6% | +48.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +98.6% | +159.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.4% | +66.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +156.2% | +715.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.7% | +37.5% |
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TNL and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TNL is the less volatile stock with a 1.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs TNL's 80.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TNLTravel + Leisure … | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.31x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $81.00 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $46.23 | $183.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.2% | +98.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.9 | 80.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 748K | 45.6M |
Evenly matched — TNL and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TNL as "Buy" and AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.6% upside for TNL (target: $85) vs 11.6% for AMZN (target: $307). TNL is the only dividend payer here at 3.43% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | TNLTravel + Leisure … | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $84.89 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.23 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.4% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
AMZN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TNL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallAmazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TNL vs AMZN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TNL or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 1% for Travel + Leisure Co. (TNL). Travel + Leisure Co. (TNL) offers the better valuation at 18. 9x trailing P/E (8. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Travel + Leisure Co. (TNL) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TNL or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, Travel + Leisure Co.
(TNL) is the cheapest at 18. 9x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 38. 3x. On forward P/E, Travel + Leisure Co. is actually cheaper at 8. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TNL or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +66. 3%, compared to +17. 4% for Travel + Leisure Co. (TNL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +715. 9% versus TNL's +156. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TNL or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Travel + Leisure Co.
(TNL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 31β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 15% more volatile than TNL relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — TNL or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus 4. 1% for Travel + Leisure Co. (TNL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amazon. com, Inc. grew EPS 29. 7% year-over-year, compared to -35. 7% for Travel + Leisure Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMZN leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TNL or AMZN?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus 5. 7% for Travel + Leisure Co. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TNL leads at 17. 8% versus 11. 2% for AMZN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TNL or AMZN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Travel + Leisure Co.
(TNL) trades at 8. 8x forward P/E versus 35. 3x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 26. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TNL: 30. 6% to $84. 89.
08Which pays a better dividend — TNL or AMZN?
In this comparison, TNL (3.
4% yield) pays a dividend. AMZN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TNL or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Travel + Leisure Co.
(TNL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (3. 4% yield, +156. 2% 10Y return). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TNL: +156. 2%, AMZN: +715. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TNL and AMZN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TNL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. TNL pays a dividend while AMZN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(TNL: 2.9% · AMZN: 16.6%)Net Margin>
%
(TNL: 5.9% · AMZN: 12.2%)P/E Ratio<
x
(TNL: 18.9x · AMZN: 38.3x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.