Publishing
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TNMG vs BZFD vs ZETA vs AMWL vs IAC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Software - Application
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Internet Content & Information
TNMG vs BZFD vs ZETA vs AMWL vs IAC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Publishing | Internet Content & Information | Software - Application | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $1M | $30M | $3.81B | $129M | $3.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $81M | $185M | $1.44B | $182M | $2.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-89M | $-58M | $-23M | $-88M | $41M |
| Gross Margin | 30.5% | 40.5% | 63.8% | 38.7% | 64.6% |
| Operating Margin | -68.7% | -25.8% | -0.0% | -50.6% | 1.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 18.7x | — | 109.7x |
| Total Debt | $22M | $86M | $197M | $5M | $1.43B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $8M | $320M | $182M | $960M |
TNMG vs BZFD vs ZETA vs AMWL vs IAC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TNL Mediagene (TNMG) | 100 | 11.6 | -88.4% |
| BuzzFeed, Inc. (BZFD) | 100 | 30.5 | -69.5% |
| Zeta Global Holding… (ZETA) | 100 | 96.1 | -3.9% |
| American Well Corpo… (AMWL) | 100 | 106.9 | +6.9% |
| IAC InterActive Cor… (IAC) | 100 | 121.9 | +21.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TNMG vs BZFD vs ZETA vs AMWL vs IAC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TNMG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +213.8% vs BZFD's -56.6%
BZFD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ZETA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 29.7%, EPS growth 63.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.2%
- 29.7% revenue growth vs IAC's -37.1%
- Lower P/E (18.7x vs 109.7x)
Among these 5 stocks, AMWL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
IAC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.10
- 347.8% 10Y total return vs ZETA's 94.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 29.8%, current ratio 2.75x
- Beta 1.10, current ratio 2.75x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.7% revenue growth vs IAC's -37.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.7x vs 109.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.8% margin vs TNMG's -110.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.10 vs ZETA's 2.79 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +213.8% vs BZFD's -56.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.6% ROA vs TNMG's -95.0%, ROIC -1.2% vs -19.5% |
TNMG vs BZFD vs ZETA vs AMWL vs IAC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TNMG vs BZFD vs ZETA vs AMWL vs IAC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IAC leads in 2 of 6 categories
ZETA leads 2 • AMWL leads 1 • TNMG leads 0 • BZFD leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IAC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IAC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.2B annually — 27.7x TNMG's $81M. IAC is the more profitable business, keeping 1.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TNMG's -110.0%. On growth, BZFD holds the edge at +66.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $81M | $185M | $1.4B | $182M | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$51M | -$32M | $77M | -$59M | $129M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$89M | -$58M | -$23M | -$88M | $41M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | -$12M | $200M | -$42M | $60M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.5% | +40.5% | +63.8% | +38.7% | +64.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -68.7% | -25.8% | -0.0% | -50.6% | +1.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -110.0% | -31.2% | -1.6% | -48.2% | +1.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -15.0% | -6.2% | +13.9% | -22.9% | +2.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.7% | +66.9% | +49.9% | -100.0% | -25.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +34.8% | -6.2% | +100.0% | +44.5% | +64.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ZETA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, IAC's 14.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ZETA's 47.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $30M | $3.8B | $129M | $3.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $21M | $108M | $3.7B | -$48M | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.04x | -0.53x | -123.43x | -1.30x | -32.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 18.71x | — | 109.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 47.63x | — | 14.30x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.03x | 0.16x | 2.92x | 0.52x | 1.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.72x | 0.62x | 4.78x | 0.50x | 0.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 20.58x | — | 71.54x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMWL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IAC delivers a 0.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-2 for TNMG. AMWL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TNMG's 23.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMWL scores 6/9 vs BZFD's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | -75.2% | -3.0% | -33.5% | +0.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -95.0% | -28.4% | -1.8% | -25.1% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -19.5% | -27.8% | +0.7% | -95.1% | -1.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -26.6% | -44.0% | +0.5% | -36.6% | -1.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 23.55x | 1.71x | 0.24x | 0.02x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $20M | $77M | -$123M | -$178M | $466M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $8M | $320M | $182M | $960M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22M | $86M | $197M | $5M | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.64x | -10.78x | 5.22x | -239.18x | 4.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ZETA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ZETA five years ago would be worth $19,438 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $208 for BZFD. Over the past 12 months, TNMG leads with a +213.8% total return vs BZFD's -56.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ZETA at 27.8% vs TNMG's -62.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -67.2% | -15.4% | -13.2% | +59.8% | +10.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +213.8% | -56.6% | +30.9% | +14.3% | +22.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.6% | -64.5% | +108.9% | -80.7% | -2.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.6% | -97.9% | +94.4% | -97.2% | -67.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.6% | -97.9% | +94.4% | -98.3% | +347.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -62.2% | -29.2% | +27.8% | -42.2% | -1.0% |
Risk & Volatility
IAC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IAC is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZETA's 2.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IAC currently trades 94.2% from its 52-week high vs TNMG's 19.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 2.48x | 2.79x | 1.47x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.68 | $2.68 | $24.90 | $9.15 | $45.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.13 | $0.54 | $12.10 | $3.71 | $29.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +19.6% | +30.4% | +69.4% | +84.7% | +94.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.8 | 69.6 | 48.5 | 67.1 | 48.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 35K | 232K | 7.3M | 59K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TNMG as "Buy", ZETA as "Buy", IAC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 52.4% upside for ZETA (target: $26) vs 14.0% for IAC (target: $49).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $26.33 | — | $49.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | — | 15 | — | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.2% | +0.0% | +9.8% |
IAC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). ZETA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
TNMG vs BZFD vs ZETA vs AMWL vs IAC: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TNMG or BZFD or ZETA or AMWL or IAC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Zeta Global Holdings Corp.
(ZETA) is the stronger pick with 29. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). Analysts rate TNL Mediagene (TNMG) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TNMG or BZFD or ZETA or AMWL or IAC?
Over the past 5 years, Zeta Global Holdings Corp.
(ZETA) delivered a total return of +94. 4%, compared to -97. 9% for BuzzFeed, Inc. (BZFD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IAC returned +347. 8% versus AMWL's -98. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TNMG or BZFD or ZETA or AMWL or IAC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IAC InterActive Corp.
(IAC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 10β versus Zeta Global Holdings Corp. 's 2. 79β — meaning ZETA is approximately 155% more volatile than IAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Well Corporation (AMWL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 24% for TNL Mediagene — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TNMG or BZFD or ZETA or AMWL or IAC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Zeta Global Holdings Corp.
(ZETA) is pulling ahead at 29. 7% versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IAC InterActive Corp. grew EPS 79. 5% year-over-year, compared to -68. 1% for BuzzFeed, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TNMG leads at 31. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TNMG or BZFD or ZETA or AMWL or IAC?
Zeta Global Holdings Corp.
(ZETA) is the more profitable company, earning -2. 4% net margin versus -99. 0% for TNL Mediagene — meaning it keeps -2. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ZETA leads at 0. 4% versus -42. 2% for AMWL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IAC leads at 66. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is TNMG or BZFD or ZETA or AMWL or IAC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Zeta Global Holdings Corp.
(ZETA) trades at 18. 7x forward P/E versus 109. 7x for IAC InterActive Corp. — 91. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ZETA: 52. 4% to $26. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — TNMG or BZFD or ZETA or AMWL or IAC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is TNMG or BZFD or ZETA or AMWL or IAC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, IAC InterActive Corp.
(IAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 10), +347. 8% 10Y return). BuzzFeed, Inc. (BZFD) carries a higher beta of 2. 48 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IAC: +347. 8%, BZFD: -97. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TNMG and BZFD and ZETA and AMWL and IAC?
These companies operate in different sectors (TNMG (Communication Services) and BZFD (Communication Services) and ZETA (Technology) and AMWL (Healthcare) and IAC (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TNMG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BZFD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ZETA is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMWL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 5%
- Gross Margin > 18%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 33%
- Gross Margin > 24%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.