Medical - Care Facilities
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
TOI vs LLY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
TOI vs LLY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $5.41B | $1.07T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $546M | $72.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-44M | $25.27B |
| Gross Margin | 14.8% | 83.5% |
| Operating Margin | -6.0% | 45.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 30.9x |
| Total Debt | $104M | $42.50B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $34M | $7.16B |
TOI vs LLY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Oncology Instit… (TOI) | 100 | 52.8 | -47.2% |
| Eli Lilly and Compa… (LLY) | 100 | 690.1 | +590.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TOI vs LLY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TOI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +100.4% vs LLY's +40.3%
LLY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 0.5%
- Rev growth 44.7%, EPS growth 96.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.7%
- 14.8% 10Y total return vs TOI's -45.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 44.7% revenue growth vs TOI's 27.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.0% margin vs TOI's -8.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs TOI's 1.95 | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; 11-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +100.4% vs LLY's +40.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.7% ROA vs TOI's -26.5%, ROIC 41.8% vs -41.2% |
TOI vs LLY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TOI vs LLY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LLY leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LLY is the larger business by revenue, generating $72.2B annually — 132.4x TOI's $546M. LLY is the more profitable business, keeping 35.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TOI's -8.0%. On growth, LLY holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $546M | $72.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$26M | $34.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$44M | $25.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$26M | $13.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.8% | +83.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.0% | +45.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.0% | +35.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.7% | +18.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +41.2% | +55.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +90.5% | +169.9% |
Valuation Metrics
TOI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.4B | $1.07T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.5B | $1.11T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.83x | 49.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 30.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.71x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 35.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.75x | 16.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 38.34x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 119.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LLY leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LLY scores 8/9 vs TOI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +101.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -26.5% | +22.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -41.2% | +41.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -33.7% | +46.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $70M | $35.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $34M | $7.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $104M | $42.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.96x | 35.68x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TOI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LLY five years ago would be worth $51,207 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,257 for TOI. Over the past 12 months, TOI leads with a +100.4% total return vs LLY's +40.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TOI at 111.1% vs LLY's 37.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +44.7% | +5.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +100.4% | +40.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +841.3% | +158.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.4% | +412.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.3% | +1484.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +111.1% | +37.2% |
Risk & Volatility
LLY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LLY is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TOI's 1.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.95x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.58 | $1182.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.02 | $623.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.2% | +95.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.3 | 70.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 2.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TOI as "Buy" and LLY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 50.7% upside for TOI (target: $8) vs 12.0% for LLY (target: $1269). LLY is the only dividend payer here at 0.53% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.00 | $1268.94 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% |
LLY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TOI leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
TOI vs LLY: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TOI or LLY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the stronger pick with 44.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 27. 8% for The Oncology Institute, Inc. (TOI). Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) offers the better valuation at 49. 4x trailing P/E (30. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Oncology Institute, Inc. (TOI) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TOI or LLY?
Over the past 5 years, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) delivered a total return of +412.
1%, compared to -47. 4% for The Oncology Institute, Inc. (TOI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LLY returned +1485% versus TOI's -45. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TOI or LLY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
53β versus The Oncology Institute, Inc. 's 1. 95β — meaning TOI is approximately 269% more volatile than LLY relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — TOI or LLY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is pulling ahead at 44.
7% versus 27. 8% for The Oncology Institute, Inc. (TOI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Eli Lilly and Company grew EPS 96. 0% year-over-year, compared to 23. 9% for The Oncology Institute, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LLY leads at 31. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TOI or LLY?
Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
7% net margin versus -12. 1% for The Oncology Institute, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LLY leads at 45. 6% versus -7. 2% for TOI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LLY leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is TOI or LLY more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TOI: 50.
7% to $8. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — TOI or LLY?
In this comparison, LLY (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. TOI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is TOI or LLY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
53), 0. 5% yield, +1485% 10Y return). The Oncology Institute, Inc. (TOI) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LLY: +1485%, TOI: -45. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TOI and LLY?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
LLY pays a dividend while TOI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.