Trucking
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TOPP vs ACMR vs ICHR vs ATXG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Integrated Freight & Logistics
TOPP vs ACMR vs ICHR vs ATXG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Trucking | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Market Cap | $20M | $3.92B | $2.47B | $3M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17M | $901M | $959M | $4M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $94M | $-51M | $-7M |
| Gross Margin | 3.0% | 44.4% | 11.3% | 14.7% |
| Operating Margin | -48.7% | 12.1% | -3.8% | -49.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 29.7x | 62.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $1M | $303M | $186M | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $766M | $98M | $325K |
TOPP vs ACMR vs ICHR vs ATXG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toppoint Holdings I… (TOPP) | 100 | 54.3 | -45.7% |
| ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) | 100 | 288.1 | +188.1% |
| Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR) | 100 | 259.4 | +159.4% |
| Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG) | 100 | 49.4 | -50.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TOPP vs ACMR vs ICHR vs ATXG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TOPP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.15
- Lower volatility, beta 0.15, Low D/E 17.0%, current ratio 3.23x
- Beta 0.15 vs ICHR's 3.93, lower leverage
ACMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.2%, EPS growth -10.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.3%
- 30.7% 10Y total return vs ICHR's 6.3%
- 15.2% revenue growth vs ATXG's -18.9%
- Better valuation composite
ICHR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +329.1% vs ATXG's -53.4%
ATXG is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.44, current ratio 7.54x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.2% revenue growth vs ATXG's -18.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.4% margin vs ATXG's -202.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.15 vs ICHR's 3.93, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +329.1% vs ATXG's -53.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.9% ROA vs TOPP's -63.3%, ROIC 7.0% vs -88.0% |
TOPP vs ACMR vs ICHR vs ATXG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TOPP vs ACMR vs ICHR vs ATXG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACMR leads in 4 of 6 categories
ATXG leads 1 • TOPP leads 0 • ICHR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACMR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICHR is the larger business by revenue, generating $959M annually — 258.8x ATXG's $4M. ACMR is the more profitable business, keeping 10.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATXG's -2.0%. On growth, TOPP holds the edge at +10.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17M | $901M | $959M | $4M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | $126M | -$11M | -$947,630 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $94M | -$51M | -$7M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | -$69M | -$17M | -$1M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +44.4% | +11.3% | +14.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -48.7% | +12.1% | -3.8% | -49.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -44.4% | +10.4% | -5.3% | -2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.9% | -7.6% | -1.7% | -34.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.4% | +9.4% | +4.7% | -7.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -76.1% | +46.2% | -136.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ATXG leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20M | $3.9B | $2.5B | $3M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20M | $3.5B | $2.6B | $25M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.44x | 43.21x | -46.25x | -0.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 29.68x | 62.25x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.22x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 27.49x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.19x | 4.35x | 2.61x | 0.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.08x | 2.06x | 3.67x | 0.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 4.56x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACMR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACMR delivers a 6.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-79 for TOPP. ACMR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ATXG's 1.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ATXG scores 4/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -78.6% | +6.1% | -7.5% | -31.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -63.3% | +3.9% | -5.2% | -19.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -88.0% | +7.0% | -3.9% | -2.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -117.2% | +6.6% | -4.7% | -3.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.16x | 0.28x | 1.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $262,454 | -$463M | $87M | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $766M | $98M | $324,953 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $303M | $186M | $22M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -21.36x | 20.44x | -5.97x | -3.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACMR five years ago would be worth $23,344 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $43 for ATXG. Over the past 12 months, ICHR leads with a +329.1% total return vs ATXG's -53.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACMR at 80.5% vs ATXG's -65.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.5% | +31.9% | +249.0% | -13.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -31.5% | +195.6% | +329.1% | -53.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.3% | +487.9% | +151.1% | -95.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.3% | +133.4% | +28.9% | -99.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.3% | +3065.8% | +629.1% | -99.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.6% | +80.5% | +35.9% | -65.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TOPP and ICHR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TOPP is the less volatile stock with a 0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICHR's 3.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ICHR currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs ATXG's 17.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.15x | 3.24x | 3.93x | 1.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.86 | $71.65 | $72.87 | $27.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.67 | $19.26 | $13.12 | $0.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +25.9% | +82.6% | +97.7% | +17.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.0 | 60.7 | 66.9 | 44.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 18K | 1.2M | 795K | 157K |
Analyst Outlook
ACMR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACMR as "Buy", ICHR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -30.1% upside for ICHR (target: $50) vs -32.4% for ACMR (target: $40). ACMR is the only dividend payer here at 0.19% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $40.00 | $49.80 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 14 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.11 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ACMR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ATXG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
TOPP vs ACMR vs ICHR vs ATXG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TOPP or ACMR or ICHR or ATXG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is the stronger pick with 15. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 9% for Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) offers the better valuation at 43. 2x trailing P/E (29. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TOPP or ACMR or ICHR or ATXG?
On forward P/E, ACM Research, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 29. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TOPP or ACMR or ICHR or ATXG?
Over the past 5 years, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) delivered a total return of +133. 4%, compared to -99. 6% for Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +30. 7% versus ATXG's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TOPP or ACMR or ICHR or ATXG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Toppoint Holdings Inc.
(TOPP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 15β versus Ichor Holdings, Ltd. 's 3. 93β — meaning ICHR is approximately 2596% more volatile than TOPP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 103% for Addentax Group Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TOPP or ACMR or ICHR or ATXG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is pulling ahead at 15. 2% versus -18. 9% for Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACM Research, Inc. grew EPS -10. 5% year-over-year, compared to -36. 0% for Toppoint Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACMR leads at 32. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TOPP or ACMR or ICHR or ATXG?
ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 4% net margin versus -121. 8% for Addentax Group Corp. — meaning it keeps 10. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACMR leads at 12. 1% versus -44. 6% for TOPP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACMR leads at 44. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TOPP or ACMR or ICHR or ATXG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) trades at 29. 7x forward P/E versus 62. 2x for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — 32. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICHR: -30. 1% to $49. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — TOPP or ACMR or ICHR or ATXG?
In this comparison, ACMR (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. TOPP, ICHR, ATXG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TOPP or ACMR or ICHR or ATXG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Toppoint Holdings Inc.
(TOPP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 15)). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) carries a higher beta of 3. 24 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TOPP: -73. 3%, ACMR: +30. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TOPP and ACMR and ICHR and ATXG?
These companies operate in different sectors (TOPP (Industrials) and ACMR (Technology) and ICHR (Technology) and ATXG (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TOPP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; ICHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ATXG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.