Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TOPS vs PSHG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Marine Shipping
TOPS vs PSHG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $10M | $71M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $123M | $80M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $52M |
| Gross Margin | 59.5% | 55.4% |
| Operating Margin | 36.5% | 63.7% |
| Forward P/E | 2.0x | 1.7x |
| Total Debt | $251M | $48M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $70M |
TOPS vs PSHG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top Ships Inc. (TOPS) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| Performance Shippin… (PSHG) | 100 | 1.8 | -98.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TOPS vs PSHG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TOPS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.54
- Rev growth 3.8%, EPS growth 108.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, current ratio 0.71x
PSHG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -99.8% 10Y total return vs TOPS's -100.0%
- Lower P/E (1.7x vs 2.0x)
- 65.4% margin vs TOPS's 1.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.8% revenue growth vs PSHG's -19.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.7x vs 2.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 65.4% margin vs TOPS's 1.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs PSHG's 0.68 | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.6% vs TOPS's -61.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.4% ROA vs TOPS's 0.3%, ROIC 13.3% vs 5.3% |
TOPS vs PSHG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TOPS vs PSHG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PSHG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TOPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $123M annually — 1.5x PSHG's $80M. PSHG is the more profitable business, keeping 65.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TOPS's 1.2%. On growth, TOPS holds the edge at +100.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $123M | $80M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $66M | $64M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1M | $52M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$63M | -$35M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.5% | +55.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +36.5% | +63.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | +65.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -50.9% | -44.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -19.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.2% | -70.5% |
Valuation Metrics
TOPS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.7x trailing earnings, PSHG trades at a 16% valuation discount to TOPS's 2.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PSHG's 0.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TOPS's 5.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10M | $71M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $254M | $48M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.02x | 1.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.97x | 0.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.12x | 0.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.07x | 0.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.59x | 5.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PSHG leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PSHG delivers a 16.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $1 for TOPS. PSHG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TOPS's 1.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PSHG scores 5/9 vs TOPS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.8% | +16.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.3% | +9.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.3% | +13.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.9% | +14.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.74x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $244M | -$23M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $70M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $251M | $48M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.91x | 19.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PSHG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PSHG five years ago would be worth $271 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $56 for TOPS. Over the past 12 months, PSHG leads with a +14.6% total return vs TOPS's -61.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PSHG at 34.1% vs TOPS's -37.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -53.6% | -17.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -61.1% | +14.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.2% | +141.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | -97.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -99.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -37.2% | +34.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TOPS and PSHG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TOPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSHG's 0.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PSHG currently trades 70.2% from its 52-week high vs TOPS's 19.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.54x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.47 | $2.58 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.11 | $1.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +19.2% | +70.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 24.7 | 49.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 210K | 139K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
PSHG is the only dividend payer here at 2.58% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +100.0% | 0.0% |
PSHG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TOPS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
TOPS vs PSHG: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TOPS or PSHG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Top Ships Inc.
(TOPS) is the stronger pick with 3. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 7% for Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG). Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG) offers the better valuation at 1. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TOPS or PSHG?
On trailing P/E, Performance Shipping Inc.
(PSHG) is the cheapest at 1. 7x versus Top Ships Inc. at 2. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TOPS or PSHG?
Over the past 5 years, Performance Shipping Inc.
(PSHG) delivered a total return of -97. 3%, compared to -99. 4% for Top Ships Inc. (TOPS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PSHG returned -99. 8% versus TOPS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TOPS or PSHG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Top Ships Inc.
(TOPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus Performance Shipping Inc. 's 0. 68β — meaning PSHG is approximately 25% more volatile than TOPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 174% for Top Ships Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TOPS or PSHG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Top Ships Inc.
(TOPS) is pulling ahead at 3. 8% versus -19. 7% for Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Top Ships Inc. grew EPS 108. 8% year-over-year, compared to -44. 0% for Performance Shipping Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PSHG leads at 33. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TOPS or PSHG?
Performance Shipping Inc.
(PSHG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 0% net margin versus 5. 8% for Top Ships Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PSHG leads at 47. 8% versus 32. 4% for TOPS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PSHG leads at 57. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — TOPS or PSHG?
In this comparison, PSHG (2.
6% yield) pays a dividend. TOPS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is TOPS or PSHG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Performance Shipping Inc.
(PSHG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 68), 2. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PSHG: -99. 8%, TOPS: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TOPS and PSHG?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
PSHG pays a dividend while TOPS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.