Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TOPS vs SHIP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TOPS
Top Ships Inc.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$10M
5Y Perf.-99.7%
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$342M
5Y Perf.-17.4%

TOPS vs SHIP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TOPS logoTOPS
SHIP logoSHIP
IndustryMarine ShippingMarine Shipping
Market Cap$10M$342M
Revenue (TTM)$123M$153M
Net Income (TTM)$1M$15M
Gross Margin59.5%45.4%
Operating Margin36.5%23.4%
Forward P/E2.0x6.9x
Total Debt$251M$290M
Cash & Equiv.$8M$63M

TOPS vs SHIPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TOPS
SHIP
StockMay 20May 26Return
Top Ships Inc. (TOPS)1000.3-99.7%
Seanergy Maritime H… (SHIP)10082.6-17.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TOPS vs SHIP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SHIP leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Top Ships Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TOPS
Top Ships Inc.
The Income Pick

TOPS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.54
  • Rev growth 3.8%, EPS growth 108.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.54, current ratio 0.71x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
The Long-Run Compounder

SHIP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • -99.7% 10Y total return vs TOPS's -100.0%
  • 9.7% margin vs TOPS's 1.2%
  • 2.9% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTOPS logoTOPS3.8% revenue growth vs SHIP's -5.6%
ValueTOPS logoTOPSLower P/E (2.0x vs 6.9x)
Quality / MarginsSHIP logoSHIP9.7% margin vs TOPS's 1.2%
Stability / SafetyTOPS logoTOPSBeta 0.54 vs SHIP's 1.21
DividendsSHIP logoSHIP2.9% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)SHIP logoSHIP+207.0% vs TOPS's -61.1%
Efficiency (ROA)SHIP logoSHIP2.5% ROA vs TOPS's 0.3%, ROIC 6.1% vs 5.3%

TOPS vs SHIP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TOPSTop Ships Inc.
FY 2021
Time Charter Contracts
100.0%$56M
Time Charter - Related Parties
0.0%$0
Voyage Charter
0.0%$0
SHIPSeanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
FY 2021
Time Charter
81.5%$125M
Spot Charter
18.5%$28M

TOPS vs SHIP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSHIPLAGGINGTOPS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — TOPS and SHIP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

SHIP and TOPS operate at a comparable scale, with $153M and $123M in trailing revenue. SHIP is the more profitable business, keeping 9.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TOPS's 1.2%. On growth, TOPS holds the edge at +100.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTOPS logoTOPSTop Ships Inc.SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$123M$153M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$66M$68M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1M$15M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$63M-$6M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+59.5%+45.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+36.5%+23.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.2%+9.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-50.9%-4.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+100.0%+18.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-3.2%+84.4%
Evenly matched — TOPS and SHIP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TOPS leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 2.0x trailing earnings, TOPS trades at a 87% valuation discount to SHIP's 16.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TOPS's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SHIP's 7.4x.

MetricTOPS logoTOPSTop Ships Inc.SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…
Market CapShares × price$10M$342M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$254M$570M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS2.02x16.05x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.93x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple4.97x7.38x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.12x2.16x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.07x1.18x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF0.59x20.11x
TOPS leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SHIP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

SHIP delivers a 5.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $1 for TOPS. SHIP carries lower financial leverage with a 1.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TOPS's 1.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TOPS scores 4/9 vs SHIP's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.

MetricTOPS logoTOPSTop Ships Inc.SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+0.8%+5.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.3%+2.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.3%+6.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.9%+7.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–943
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.74x1.03x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$244M$228M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$8M$63M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$251M$290M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.91x1.68x
SHIP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SHIP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SHIP five years ago would be worth $16,564 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $56 for TOPS. Over the past 12 months, SHIP leads with a +207.0% total return vs TOPS's -61.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHIP at 56.3% vs TOPS's -37.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTOPS logoTOPSTop Ships Inc.SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-53.6%+79.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-61.1%+207.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-75.2%+282.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.4%+65.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-99.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-37.2%+56.3%
SHIP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — TOPS and SHIP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

TOPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHIP's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHIP currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs TOPS's 19.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTOPS logoTOPSTop Ships Inc.SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.54x1.21x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$11.47$16.77
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.11$5.37
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+19.2%+96.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10024.762.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded210K258K
Evenly matched — TOPS and SHIP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

SHIP is the only dividend payer here at 2.85% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricTOPS logoTOPSTop Ships Inc.SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$17.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts3
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.46
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+100.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

SHIP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). TOPS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallSeanergy Maritime Holdings … (SHIP)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TOPS vs SHIP: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TOPS or SHIP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Top Ships Inc.

(TOPS) is the stronger pick with 3. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 6% for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP). Top Ships Inc. (TOPS) offers the better valuation at 2. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TOPS or SHIP?

On trailing P/E, Top Ships Inc.

(TOPS) is the cheapest at 2. 0x versus Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. at 16. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TOPS or SHIP?

Over the past 5 years, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.

(SHIP) delivered a total return of +65. 6%, compared to -99. 4% for Top Ships Inc. (TOPS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHIP returned -99. 7% versus TOPS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TOPS or SHIP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Top Ships Inc.

(TOPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. 's 1. 21β — meaning SHIP is approximately 124% more volatile than TOPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 103% versus 174% for Top Ships Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TOPS or SHIP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Top Ships Inc.

(TOPS) is pulling ahead at 3. 8% versus -5. 6% for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Top Ships Inc. grew EPS 108. 8% year-over-year, compared to -52. 1% for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TOPS leads at 15. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TOPS or SHIP?

Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.

(SHIP) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 2% net margin versus 5. 8% for Top Ships Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TOPS leads at 32. 4% versus 26. 0% for SHIP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TOPS leads at 43. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — TOPS or SHIP?

In this comparison, SHIP (2.

9% yield) pays a dividend. TOPS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is TOPS or SHIP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Top Ships Inc.

(TOPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TOPS: -100. 0%, SHIP: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between TOPS and SHIP?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

SHIP pays a dividend while TOPS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

TOPS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 49%
  • Gross Margin > 35%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SHIP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TOPS and SHIP on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TOPS: 100.0% · SHIP: 18.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(TOPS: 2.0x · SHIP: 16.0x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.