Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TORO vs SPIR vs ASTS vs TOPS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Communication Equipment
Marine Shipping
TORO vs SPIR vs ASTS vs TOPS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Specialty Business Services | Communication Equipment | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $104M | $529.86B | $19.12B | $10M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $21M | $72M | $71M | $123M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $-25.02B | $-342M | $1M |
| Gross Margin | 18.1% | 40.8% | 53.4% | 59.5% |
| Operating Margin | -26.5% | -121.4% | -405.7% | 36.5% |
| Forward P/E | 5.0x | 10.0x | — | 2.0x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $8.76B | $32M | $251M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $37M | $24.81B | $2.34B | $8M |
TORO vs SPIR vs ASTS vs TOPS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toro Corp. (TORO) | 100 | 202.6 | +102.6% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 301.6 | +201.6% |
| AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS) | 100 | 1286.3 | +1186.3% |
| Top Ships Inc. (TOPS) | 100 | 20.8 | -79.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TORO vs SPIR vs ASTS vs TOPS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TORO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.83, yield 1.5%
- Beta 1.83, yield 1.5%, current ratio 11.77x
- 26.0% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
- 1.5% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
SPIR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ASTS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs TORO's 110.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.82, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 16.35x
- 15.1% revenue growth vs TORO's -71.5%
TOPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and stability is your priority.
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.54 vs SPIR's 2.93
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs TORO's -71.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.0% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs SPIR's 2.93 | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +328.6% vs TOPS's -61.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.4% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC -1.9% vs -0.1% |
TORO vs SPIR vs ASTS vs TOPS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TORO vs SPIR vs ASTS vs TOPS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TOPS leads in 2 of 6 categories
ASTS leads 1 • TORO leads 1 • SPIR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TOPS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TOPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $123M annually — 5.8x TORO's $21M. TORO is the more profitable business, keeping 26.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +27.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $21M | $72M | $71M | $123M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$540,732 | -$74M | -$237M | $66M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | -$25.0B | -$342M | $1M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$92M | -$16.2B | -$1.1B | -$63M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +40.8% | +53.4% | +59.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -26.5% | -121.4% | -4.1% | +36.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.0% | -349.6% | -4.8% | +1.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | -227.0% | -16.0% | -50.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.2% | -26.9% | +27.3% | +100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +59.5% | -55.6% | -3.2% |
Valuation Metrics
TOPS leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.0x trailing earnings, TOPS trades at a 80% valuation discount to SPIR's 10.0x P/E.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $104M | $529.9B | $19.1B | $10M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $67M | $513.8B | $16.8B | $254M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.00x | 10.01x | -48.76x | 2.02x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 4.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.65x | 7405.21x | 269.64x | 0.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.29x | 4.56x | 5.68x | 0.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.20x | — | — | 0.59x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — TORO and SPIR each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TORO delivers a 1.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-88 for SPIR. ASTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TOPS's 1.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPIR scores 5/9 vs TORO's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.4% | -88.4% | -21.1% | +0.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | -47.3% | -12.6% | +0.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.9% | -0.1% | -47.1% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.8% | -0.1% | -10.0% | +6.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.08x | 0.01x | 1.74x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$37M | -$16.1B | -$2.3B | $244M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $37M | $24.8B | $2.3B | $8M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $8.8B | $32M | $251M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.11x | 9.20x | -21.20x | 1.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASTS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASTS five years ago would be worth $78,824 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $56 for TOPS. Over the past 12 months, TORO leads with a +328.6% total return vs TOPS's -61.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASTS at 134.8% vs TOPS's -37.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +50.6% | +106.4% | -21.7% | -53.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +328.6% | +73.1% | +158.1% | -61.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +132.1% | +198.1% | +1194.0% | -75.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.4% | -79.6% | +688.2% | -99.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.4% | -78.8% | +568.8% | -100.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.4% | +43.9% | +134.8% | -37.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SPIR and TOPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TOPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SPIR currently trades 68.3% from its 52-week high vs TOPS's 19.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.83x | 2.93x | 2.82x | 0.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.50 | $23.59 | $129.89 | $11.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.77 | $6.60 | $22.47 | $2.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.1% | +68.3% | +50.3% | +19.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.8 | 55.5 | 41.8 | 24.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 566K | 1.6M | 14.9M | 210K |
Analyst Outlook
TORO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SPIR as "Buy", ASTS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 58.6% upside for ASTS (target: $104) vs 7.0% for SPIR (target: $17). TORO is the only dividend payer here at 1.48% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.25 | $103.65 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 7 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.08 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +100.0% |
TOPS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ASTS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
TORO vs SPIR vs ASTS vs TOPS: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TORO or SPIR or ASTS or TOPS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is the stronger pick with 1505% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -71. 5% for Toro Corp. (TORO). Top Ships Inc. (TOPS) offers the better valuation at 2. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TORO or SPIR or ASTS or TOPS?
On trailing P/E, Top Ships Inc.
(TOPS) is the cheapest at 2. 0x versus Spire Global, Inc. at 10. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TORO or SPIR or ASTS or TOPS?
Over the past 5 years, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) delivered a total return of +688. 2%, compared to -99. 4% for Top Ships Inc. (TOPS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASTS returned +568. 8% versus TOPS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TORO or SPIR or ASTS or TOPS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Top Ships Inc.
(TOPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 441% more volatile than TOPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 174% for Top Ships Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TORO or SPIR or ASTS or TOPS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is pulling ahead at 1505% versus -71. 5% for Toro Corp. (TORO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to -85. 6% for Toro Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASTS leads at 72. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TORO or SPIR or ASTS or TOPS?
Toro Corp.
(TORO) is the more profitable company, earning 112. 6% net margin versus -482. 2% for AST SpaceMobile, Inc. — meaning it keeps 112. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TOPS leads at 32. 4% versus -405. 7% for ASTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASTS leads at 53. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — TORO or SPIR or ASTS or TOPS?
In this comparison, TORO (1.
5% yield) pays a dividend. SPIR, ASTS, TOPS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is TORO or SPIR or ASTS or TOPS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Top Ships Inc.
(TOPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54)). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TOPS: -100. 0%, SPIR: -78. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TORO and SPIR and ASTS and TOPS?
These companies operate in different sectors (TORO (Industrials) and SPIR (Industrials) and ASTS (Technology) and TOPS (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TORO is a small-cap deep-value stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TOPS is a small-cap deep-value stock. TORO pays a dividend while SPIR, ASTS, TOPS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.