Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TPCS vs DRS vs VSEC vs TDG vs WWD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
TPCS vs DRS vs VSEC vs TDG vs WWD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $41M | $11.05B | $4.56B | $70.14B | $22.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $33M | $3.69B | $1.18B | $9.11B | $4.00B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1M | $290M | $63M | $1.97B | $514M |
| Gross Margin | 18.0% | 24.2% | 12.2% | 59.0% | 28.4% |
| Operating Margin | -1.5% | 9.9% | 10.7% | 46.5% | 15.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 33.0x | 47.9x | 32.0x | 41.5x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $470M | $343M | $30.03B | $722M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $195K | $647M | $69M | $2.81B | $327M |
TPCS vs DRS vs VSEC vs TDG vs WWD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TechPrecision Corpo… (TPCS) | 100 | 65.2 | -34.8% |
| Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS) | 100 | 828.8 | +728.8% |
| VSE Corporation (VSEC) | 100 | 767.1 | +667.1% |
| TransDigm Group Inc… (TDG) | 100 | 292.4 | +192.4% |
| Woodward, Inc. (WWD) | 100 | 540.6 | +440.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TPCS vs DRS vs VSEC vs TDG vs WWD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TPCS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 7.7%, EPS growth 64.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.2%
DRS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 54.1% 10Y total return vs WWD's 6.0%
- 12.8% revenue growth vs VSEC's 3.0%
Among these 5 stocks, VSEC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TDG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 13.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.79, current ratio 3.21x
- PEG 1.03 vs WWD's 2.97
- Beta 0.79, yield 13.3%, current ratio 3.21x
WWD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum and efficiency is your priority.
- +91.5% vs TDG's -3.7%
- 10.8% ROA vs TPCS's -3.5%, ROIC 13.3% vs -8.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.8% revenue growth vs VSEC's 3.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (32.0x vs 41.5x), PEG 1.03 vs 2.97 | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.6% margin vs TPCS's -3.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs VSEC's 1.93 | |
| Dividends | 13.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs WWD's 0.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +91.5% vs TDG's -3.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.8% ROA vs TPCS's -3.5%, ROIC 13.3% vs -8.0% |
TPCS vs DRS vs VSEC vs TDG vs WWD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TPCS vs DRS vs VSEC vs TDG vs WWD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TDG leads in 2 of 6 categories
VSEC leads 1 • TPCS leads 0 • DRS leads 0 • WWD leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDG is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.1B annually — 275.7x TPCS's $33M. TDG is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TPCS's -3.4%. On growth, VSEC holds the edge at +26.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $33M | $3.7B | $1.2B | $9.1B | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $436M | $170M | $4.6B | $715M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1M | $290M | $63M | $2.0B | $514M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $397M | -$14M | $1.9B | $389M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +24.2% | +12.2% | +59.0% | +28.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.5% | +9.9% | +10.7% | +46.5% | +15.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | +7.8% | +5.3% | +21.6% | +12.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -13.4% | +10.7% | -1.1% | +20.6% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.9% | +5.9% | +26.8% | +13.9% | +23.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -87.5% | +21.1% | +3.4% | -13.1% | +23.0% |
Valuation Metrics
TDG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 38.7x trailing earnings, TDG trades at a 51% valuation discount to VSEC's 79.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TDG offers better value at 1.24x vs WWD's 3.69x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $41M | $11.1B | $4.6B | $70.1B | $22.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $53M | $10.9B | $4.8B | $97.4B | $22.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -14.21x | 40.23x | 79.15x | 38.72x | 51.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 33.01x | 47.91x | 32.01x | 41.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.20x | — | 1.24x | 3.69x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 82.75x | 24.67x | 29.30x | 21.48x | 36.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.21x | 3.03x | 4.10x | 7.94x | 6.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.46x | 4.08x | 2.94x | — | 8.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 48.70x | 798.59x | 38.63x | 64.94x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — DRS and WWD each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WWD delivers a 20.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-14 for TPCS. DRS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TPCS's 1.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WWD scores 9/9 vs TPCS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.2% | +10.8% | +4.1% | — | +20.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.5% | +6.8% | +3.0% | +8.6% | +10.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.0% | +10.5% | +5.9% | +20.9% | +13.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -12.8% | +10.8% | +7.7% | +20.8% | +14.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.35x | 0.17x | 0.24x | — | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12M | -$177M | $273M | $27.2B | $395M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $195,000 | $647M | $69M | $2.8B | $327M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $470M | $343M | $30.0B | $722M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.27x | 40.86x | 8.72x | 2.55x | 14.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VSEC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VSEC five years ago would be worth $45,853 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,240 for TPCS. Over the past 12 months, WWD leads with a +91.5% total return vs TDG's -3.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VSEC at 61.0% vs TPCS's -18.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.8% | +19.4% | +10.1% | -8.6% | +19.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.1% | +0.6% | +57.0% | -3.7% | +91.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.4% | +165.6% | +317.6% | +86.7% | +244.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.6% | +231.9% | +358.5% | +140.2% | +188.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +415.0% | +5411.8% | +517.9% | +595.3% | +600.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.8% | +38.5% | +61.0% | +23.1% | +51.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TDG and WWD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TDG is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VSEC's 1.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WWD currently trades 91.1% from its 52-week high vs TPCS's 65.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.88x | 0.95x | 1.93x | 0.79x | 1.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.25 | $49.31 | $232.61 | $1623.83 | $407.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.83 | $32.43 | $121.75 | $1123.61 | $193.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.9% | +84.0% | +85.7% | +76.5% | +91.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.0 | 46.5 | 57.7 | 56.5 | 55.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 54K | 1.1M | 662K | 370K | 692K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TDG and WWD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DRS as "Buy", VSEC as "Buy", TDG as "Buy", WWD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.3% upside for TDG (target: $1618) vs 16.8% for WWD (target: $433). For income investors, TDG offers the higher dividend yield at 13.32% vs VSEC's 0.20%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $53.00 | $235.67 | $1617.88 | $433.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 11 | 39 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.9% | +0.2% | +13.3% | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.36 | $0.39 | $165.45 | $1.06 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.7% | +0.8% |
TDG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). VSEC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
TPCS vs DRS vs VSEC vs TDG vs WWD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TPCS or DRS or VSEC or TDG or WWD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Leonardo DRS, Inc.
(DRS) is the stronger pick with 12. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for VSE Corporation (VSEC). TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) offers the better valuation at 38. 7x trailing P/E (32. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TPCS or DRS or VSEC or TDG or WWD?
On trailing P/E, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the cheapest at 38.
7x versus VSE Corporation at 79. 1x. On forward P/E, TransDigm Group Incorporated is actually cheaper at 32. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: TransDigm Group Incorporated wins at 1. 03x versus Woodward, Inc. 's 2. 97x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TPCS or DRS or VSEC or TDG or WWD?
Over the past 5 years, VSE Corporation (VSEC) delivered a total return of +358.
5%, compared to -17. 6% for TechPrecision Corporation (TPCS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DRS returned +54. 1% versus TPCS's +415. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TPCS or DRS or VSEC or TDG or WWD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
79β versus VSE Corporation's 1. 93β — meaning VSEC is approximately 146% more volatile than TDG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 135% for TechPrecision Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TPCS or DRS or VSEC or TDG or WWD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Leonardo DRS, Inc.
(DRS) is pulling ahead at 12. 8% versus 3. 0% for VSE Corporation (VSEC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TechPrecision Corporation grew EPS 64. 2% year-over-year, compared to 19. 6% for Woodward, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VSEC leads at 18. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TPCS or DRS or VSEC or TDG or WWD?
TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
5% net margin versus -8. 1% for TechPrecision Corporation — meaning it keeps 23. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TDG leads at 47. 2% versus -6. 3% for TPCS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TDG leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TPCS or DRS or VSEC or TDG or WWD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 03x versus Woodward, Inc. 's 2. 97x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) trades at 32. 0x forward P/E versus 47. 9x for VSE Corporation — 15. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TDG: 30. 3% to $1617. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — TPCS or DRS or VSEC or TDG or WWD?
In this comparison, TDG (13.
3% yield), DRS (0. 9% yield), WWD (0. 3% yield), VSEC (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. TPCS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TPCS or DRS or VSEC or TDG or WWD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
79), 13. 3% yield, +595. 3% 10Y return). VSE Corporation (VSEC) carries a higher beta of 1. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TDG: +595. 3%, VSEC: +517. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TPCS and DRS and VSEC and TDG and WWD?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TPCS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DRS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; VSEC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TDG is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; WWD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. DRS, TDG pay a dividend while TPCS, VSEC, WWD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.