Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TRAK vs GWRE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
TRAK vs GWRE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $185M | $11.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $24M | $1.34B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $189M |
| Gross Margin | 85.0% | 63.8% |
| Operating Margin | 30.2% | 6.8% |
| Forward P/E | 27.8x | 39.7x |
| Total Debt | $510K | $716M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29M | $699M |
TRAK vs GWRE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) | 100 | 198.3 | +98.3% |
| Guidewire Software,… (GWRE) | 100 | 136.1 | +36.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TRAK vs GWRE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TRAK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 6.09x
- Lower P/E (27.8x vs 39.7x)
- 30.9% margin vs GWRE's 14.1%
GWRE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.61
- Rev growth 22.6%, EPS growth 11.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.0%
- 151.9% 10Y total return vs TRAK's 14.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.6% revenue growth vs TRAK's 10.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (27.8x vs 39.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.9% margin vs GWRE's 14.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs TRAK's 1.15 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -34.5% vs TRAK's -52.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.9% ROA vs GWRE's 7.2%, ROIC 21.4% vs 2.3% |
TRAK vs GWRE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TRAK vs GWRE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRAK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GWRE is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 57.1x TRAK's $24M. TRAK is the more profitable business, keeping 30.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GWRE's 14.1%. On growth, GWRE holds the edge at +24.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $24M | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8M | $103M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $189M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | $310M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +85.0% | +63.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.2% | +6.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +30.9% | +14.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.1% | +23.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | +24.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.2% | +2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
TRAK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.0x trailing earnings, TRAK trades at a 83% valuation discount to GWRE's 172.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TRAK's 21.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GWRE's 182.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $185M | $11.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $157M | $11.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 29.01x | 172.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 27.82x | 39.70x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.85x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.98x | 182.26x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.18x | 9.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.93x | 8.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.01x | 39.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TRAK leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRAK delivers a 14.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $13 for GWRE. TRAK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GWRE's 0.49x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.6% | +12.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.9% | +7.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.4% | +2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.9% | +2.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$28M | $17M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $699M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $509,973 | $716M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 165.50x | 388.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GWRE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRAK five years ago would be worth $21,031 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,142 for GWRE. Over the past 12 months, GWRE leads with a -34.5% total return vs TRAK's -52.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GWRE at 21.6% vs TRAK's 17.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.1% | -25.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -52.5% | -34.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.0% | +79.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.3% | +41.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.5% | +151.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.7% | +21.6% |
Risk & Volatility
GWRE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GWRE is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRAK's 1.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GWRE currently trades 51.2% from its 52-week high vs TRAK's 42.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.15x | 0.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.72 | $272.60 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.94 | $115.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.8% | +51.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.8 | 41.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 161K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TRAK as "Buy" and GWRE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 136.3% upside for TRAK (target: $24) vs 75.6% for GWRE (target: $245). TRAK is the only dividend payer here at 0.85% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.00 | $245.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.09 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | 0.0% |
TRAK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). GWRE leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
TRAK vs GWRE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TRAK or GWRE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Guidewire Software, Inc.
(GWRE) is the stronger pick with 22. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 5% for ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK). ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) offers the better valuation at 29. 0x trailing P/E (27. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TRAK or GWRE?
On trailing P/E, ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) is the cheapest at 29. 0x versus Guidewire Software, Inc. at 172. 3x. On forward P/E, ReposiTrak, Inc. is actually cheaper at 27. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TRAK or GWRE?
Over the past 5 years, ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) delivered a total return of +110. 3%, compared to +41. 4% for Guidewire Software, Inc. (GWRE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GWRE returned +151. 9% versus TRAK's +14. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TRAK or GWRE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Guidewire Software, Inc.
(GWRE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus ReposiTrak, Inc. 's 1. 15β — meaning TRAK is approximately 89% more volatile than GWRE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 49% for Guidewire Software, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TRAK or GWRE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Guidewire Software, Inc.
(GWRE) is pulling ahead at 22. 6% versus 10. 5% for ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guidewire Software, Inc. grew EPS 1192% year-over-year, compared to 20. 7% for ReposiTrak, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GWRE leads at 14. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TRAK or GWRE?
ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 9% net margin versus 5. 8% for Guidewire Software, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRAK leads at 27. 5% versus 3. 4% for GWRE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRAK leads at 83. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TRAK or GWRE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) trades at 27. 8x forward P/E versus 39. 7x for Guidewire Software, Inc. — 11. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRAK: 136. 3% to $24. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TRAK or GWRE?
In this comparison, TRAK (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. GWRE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TRAK or GWRE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Guidewire Software, Inc.
(GWRE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 61), +151. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GWRE: +151. 9%, TRAK: +14. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TRAK and GWRE?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TRAK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GWRE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. TRAK pays a dividend while GWRE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.