Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TRAK vs VRNT vs SSYS vs MNDY vs VEEV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Computer Hardware
Software - Application
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
TRAK vs VRNT vs SSYS vs MNDY vs VEEV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Computer Hardware | Software - Application | Medical - Healthcare Information Services |
| Market Cap | $186M | $1.24B | $734M | $3.72B | $27.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $24M | $894M | $548M | $1.23B | $3.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $61M | $-115M | $119M | $909M |
| Gross Margin | 85.0% | 69.9% | 43.1% | 89.2% | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | 30.2% | 8.6% | -13.9% | -0.1% | 28.7% |
| Forward P/E | 28.0x | 7.0x | 72.5x | 17.9x | 18.8x |
| Total Debt | $510K | $448M | $27M | $312M | $96M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29M | $216M | $95M | $1.50B | $1.42B |
TRAK vs VRNT vs SSYS vs MNDY vs VEEV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) | 100 | 185.7 | +85.7% |
| Verint Systems Inc. (VRNT) | 100 | 45.0 | -55.0% |
| Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS) | 100 | 32.9 | -67.1% |
| monday.com Ltd. (MNDY) | 100 | 32.2 | -67.8% |
| Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV) | 100 | 53.5 | -46.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TRAK vs VRNT vs SSYS vs MNDY vs VEEV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TRAK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.09, yield 0.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.09, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 6.09x
- Beta 1.09, yield 0.8%, current ratio 6.09x
- 30.9% margin vs SSYS's -21.0%
VRNT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.36 vs VEEV's 1.03
- Lower P/E (7.0x vs 18.8x), PEG 0.36 vs 1.03
- 1.6% yield, vs TRAK's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
- +13.8% vs MNDY's -74.4%
Among these 5 stocks, SSYS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MNDY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 26.7%, EPS growth 261.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.4%
- 26.7% revenue growth vs SSYS's -3.7%
VEEV is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 5.1% 10Y total return vs TRAK's 15.4%
- Beta 0.72 vs SSYS's 1.82, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.7% revenue growth vs SSYS's -3.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 18.8x), PEG 0.36 vs 1.03 | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.9% margin vs SSYS's -21.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.72 vs SSYS's 1.82, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield, vs TRAK's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +13.8% vs MNDY's -74.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.9% ROA vs SSYS's -10.5%, ROIC 21.4% vs -5.8% |
TRAK vs VRNT vs SSYS vs MNDY vs VEEV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TRAK vs VRNT vs SSYS vs MNDY vs VEEV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRAK leads in 2 of 6 categories
MNDY leads 1 • VRNT leads 1 • SSYS leads 0 • VEEV leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MNDY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VEEV is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 136.0x TRAK's $24M. TRAK is the more profitable business, keeping 30.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SSYS's -21.0%. On growth, MNDY holds the edge at +24.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $24M | $894M | $548M | $1.2B | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8M | $127M | -$44M | $12M | $956M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $61M | -$115M | $119M | $909M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | $118M | -$10M | $321M | $1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +85.0% | +69.9% | +43.1% | +89.2% | +75.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.2% | +8.6% | -13.9% | -0.1% | +28.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +30.9% | +6.9% | -21.0% | +9.6% | +28.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.1% | +13.2% | -1.8% | +26.0% | +43.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | -1.0% | -2.5% | +24.6% | +16.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.2% | -5.1% | -55.6% | +2.3% | +23.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — VRNT and SSYS each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.7x trailing earnings, VRNT trades at a 39% valuation discount to MNDY's 32.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRAK offers better value at 0.85x vs VEEV's 1.68x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $186M | $1.2B | $734M | $3.7B | $27.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $158M | $1.5B | $666M | $2.5B | $25.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 29.23x | 19.72x | -6.66x | 32.17x | 30.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 28.03x | 7.00x | 72.51x | 17.93x | 18.76x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.85x | 1.02x | — | — | 1.68x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.16x | 9.46x | — | 209.33x | 28.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.24x | 1.37x | 1.33x | 3.02x | 8.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.95x | 0.97x | 0.82x | 3.07x | 3.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.17x | 8.75x | — | 11.86x | 19.10x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TRAK leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRAK delivers a 14.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-13 for SSYS. TRAK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VRNT's 0.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRAK scores 7/9 vs MNDY's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.6% | +4.6% | -13.4% | +9.5% | +13.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.9% | +2.8% | -10.5% | +5.6% | +11.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.4% | +5.3% | -5.8% | -2.4% | +12.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.9% | +5.9% | -6.6% | -0.1% | +13.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.34x | 0.03x | 0.25x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$28M | $233M | -$68M | -$1.2B | -$1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $216M | $95M | $1.5B | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $509,973 | $448M | $27M | $312M | $96M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 165.50x | 8.24x | — | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRAK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRAK five years ago would be worth $20,681 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,029 for MNDY. Over the past 12 months, VRNT leads with a +13.8% total return vs MNDY's -74.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRAK at 18.0% vs MNDY's -16.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.4% | — | -5.4% | -49.7% | -24.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -53.1% | +13.8% | -23.5% | -74.4% | -30.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +64.2% | -39.3% | -40.6% | -42.1% | -6.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.8% | -55.8% | -54.3% | -59.7% | -33.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.4% | -37.1% | -59.0% | -59.7% | +512.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.0% | -15.3% | -16.0% | -16.7% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VRNT and VEEV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VEEV is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SSYS's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VRNT currently trades 89.8% from its 52-week high vs MNDY's 22.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | 1.25x | 1.82x | 1.09x | 0.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.72 | $22.84 | $12.81 | $316.98 | $310.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.94 | $16.23 | $7.34 | $57.50 | $148.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.1% | +89.8% | +66.5% | +22.7% | +53.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.5 | 68.4 | 42.6 | 59.7 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 154K | 0 | 831K | 1.5M | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
VRNT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TRAK as "Buy", VRNT as "Hold", SSYS as "Buy", MNDY as "Buy", VEEV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 134.6% upside for TRAK (target: $24) vs 58.5% for SSYS (target: $14). For income investors, VRNT offers the higher dividend yield at 1.56% vs TRAK's 0.85%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.00 | $32.57 | $13.50 | $133.00 | $280.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 16 | 36 | 25 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +1.6% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.09 | $0.32 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +5.8% | 0.0% | +3.6% | +0.6% |
TRAK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). MNDY leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
TRAK vs VRNT vs SSYS vs MNDY vs VEEV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TRAK or VRNT or SSYS or MNDY or VEEV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, monday.
com Ltd. (MNDY) is the stronger pick with 26. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 7% for Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS). Verint Systems Inc. (VRNT) offers the better valuation at 19. 7x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TRAK or VRNT or SSYS or MNDY or VEEV?
On trailing P/E, Verint Systems Inc.
(VRNT) is the cheapest at 19. 7x versus monday. com Ltd. at 32. 2x. On forward P/E, Verint Systems Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Verint Systems Inc. wins at 0. 36x versus Veeva Systems Inc. 's 1. 03x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TRAK or VRNT or SSYS or MNDY or VEEV?
Over the past 5 years, ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) delivered a total return of +106. 8%, compared to -59. 7% for monday. com Ltd. (MNDY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VEEV returned +512. 1% versus MNDY's -59. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TRAK or VRNT or SSYS or MNDY or VEEV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Veeva Systems Inc.
(VEEV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 72β versus Stratasys Ltd. 's 1. 82β — meaning SSYS is approximately 151% more volatile than VEEV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 34% for Verint Systems Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TRAK or VRNT or SSYS or MNDY or VEEV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), monday.
com Ltd. (MNDY) is pulling ahead at 26. 7% versus -3. 7% for Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Verint Systems Inc. grew EPS 271. 4% year-over-year, compared to 20. 7% for ReposiTrak, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNDY leads at 33. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TRAK or VRNT or SSYS or MNDY or VEEV?
ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 9% net margin versus -18. 9% for Stratasys Ltd. — meaning it keeps 30. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VEEV leads at 28. 7% versus -10. 7% for SSYS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNDY leads at 89. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TRAK or VRNT or SSYS or MNDY or VEEV more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Verint Systems Inc. (VRNT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 36x versus Veeva Systems Inc. 's 1. 03x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Verint Systems Inc. (VRNT) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 72. 5x for Stratasys Ltd. — 65. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRAK: 134. 6% to $24. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TRAK or VRNT or SSYS or MNDY or VEEV?
In this comparison, VRNT (1.
6% yield), TRAK (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. SSYS, MNDY, VEEV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TRAK or VRNT or SSYS or MNDY or VEEV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Veeva Systems Inc.
(VEEV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 72), +512. 1% 10Y return). Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VEEV: +512. 1%, SSYS: -59. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TRAK and VRNT and SSYS and MNDY and VEEV?
These companies operate in different sectors (TRAK (Technology) and VRNT (Technology) and SSYS (Technology) and MNDY (Technology) and VEEV (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TRAK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VRNT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SSYS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MNDY is a small-cap high-growth stock; VEEV is a mid-cap high-growth stock. TRAK, VRNT pay a dividend while SSYS, MNDY, VEEV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.