Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TRC vs WY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Specialty
TRC vs WY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Conglomerates | REIT - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $553M | $17.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $50M | $6.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $73K | $397M |
| Gross Margin | 12.3% | 13.4% |
| Operating Margin | -16.0% | 7.7% |
| Forward P/E | 341.3x | 83.6x |
| Total Debt | $94M | $5.57B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $464M |
TRC vs WY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tejon Ranch Co. (TRC) | 100 | 142.8 | +42.8% |
| Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) | 100 | 117.4 | +17.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TRC vs WY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TRC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.44
- Rev growth 18.4%, EPS growth -97.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -14.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.44, Low D/E 19.2%, current ratio 4.14x
WY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 16.5% 10Y total return vs TRC's -2.5%
- Lower P/E (83.6x vs 341.3x)
- 5.7% margin vs TRC's 0.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.4% revenue growth vs WY's -3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (83.6x vs 341.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.7% margin vs TRC's 0.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.44 vs WY's 0.51, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.8% vs WY's -5.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.4% ROA vs TRC's 0.0%, ROIC 2.4% vs -1.1% |
TRC vs WY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TRC vs WY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WY is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.9B annually — 139.5x TRC's $50M. WY is the more profitable business, keeping 5.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TRC's 0.1%. On growth, TRC holds the edge at +17.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $50M | $6.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$47,000 | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $73,000 | $397M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$33M | $516M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +13.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -16.0% | +7.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | +5.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -65.9% | +7.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.7% | -2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -65.5% | +100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
WY leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 52.7x trailing earnings, WY trades at a 99% valuation discount to TRC's 7312.5x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $553M | $17.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $637M | $22.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7312.50x | 52.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 341.25x | 83.63x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 22.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.15x | 2.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.12x | 1.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 194.19x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — TRC and WY each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WY delivers a 4.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $0 for TRC. TRC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WY's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRC scores 6/9 vs WY's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.0% | +4.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.0% | +2.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.1% | +2.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.3% | +3.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $84M | $5.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $464M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $94M | $5.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRC five years ago would be worth $13,025 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,633 for WY. Over the past 12 months, TRC leads with a +18.8% total return vs WY's -5.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRC at 6.7% vs WY's -4.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.7% | +0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.8% | -5.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.5% | -11.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.2% | -23.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.5% | +16.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.7% | -4.1% |
Risk & Volatility
TRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.44 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WY's 0.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRC currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs WY's 85.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.44x | 0.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.31 | $27.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.31 | $21.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.1% | +85.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.6 | 45.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 98K | 5.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TRC as "Buy" and WY as "Buy". WY is the only dividend payer here at 3.54% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $29.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.84 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% |
WY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TRC leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
TRC vs WY: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TRC or WY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tejon Ranch Co.
(TRC) is the stronger pick with 18. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 1% for Weyerhaeuser Company (WY). Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) offers the better valuation at 52. 7x trailing P/E (83. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tejon Ranch Co. (TRC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TRC or WY?
On trailing P/E, Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the cheapest at 52.
7x versus Tejon Ranch Co. at 7312. 5x. On forward P/E, Weyerhaeuser Company is actually cheaper at 83. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TRC or WY?
Over the past 5 years, Tejon Ranch Co.
(TRC) delivered a total return of +30. 2%, compared to -23. 7% for Weyerhaeuser Company (WY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WY returned +16. 5% versus TRC's -2. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TRC or WY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tejon Ranch Co.
(TRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 44β versus Weyerhaeuser Company's 0. 51β — meaning WY is approximately 17% more volatile than TRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tejon Ranch Co. (TRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 59% for Weyerhaeuser Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TRC or WY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tejon Ranch Co.
(TRC) is pulling ahead at 18. 4% versus -3. 1% for Weyerhaeuser Company (WY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Weyerhaeuser Company grew EPS -16. 7% year-over-year, compared to -97. 2% for Tejon Ranch Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WY leads at -12. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TRC or WY?
Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
7% net margin versus 0. 2% for Tejon Ranch Co. — meaning it keeps 4. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WY leads at 6. 7% versus -16. 0% for TRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRC leads at 12. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TRC or WY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) trades at 83.
6x forward P/E versus 341. 3x for Tejon Ranch Co. — 257. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — TRC or WY?
In this comparison, WY (3.
5% yield) pays a dividend. TRC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TRC or WY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
51), 3. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WY: +16. 5%, TRC: -2. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TRC and WY?
These companies operate in different sectors (TRC (Industrials) and WY (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TRC is a small-cap high-growth stock; WY is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. WY pays a dividend while TRC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.