TRMK vs RNST

For growth investors, Renasant Corporation (RNST) is the stronger pick with 39.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 34. 8% for Trustmark Corporation (TRMK). Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Renasant Corporation (RNST) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the cheapest at 12.

1x versus Renasant Corporation at 19. 6x. On forward P/E, Renasant Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Trustmark Corporation wins at 1. 43x versus Renasant Corporation's 1. 56x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) delivered a total return of +47.

4%, compared to +0. 3% for Renasant Corporation (RNST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRMK returned +127. 3% versus RNST's +47. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

94β versus Renasant Corporation's 1. 03β — meaning RNST is approximately 9% more volatile than TRMK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Renasant Corporation (RNST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 27% versus 53% for Trustmark Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Renasant Corporation (RNST) is pulling ahead at 39.

1% versus 34. 8% for Trustmark Corporation (TRMK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Trustmark Corporation grew EPS 1. 9% year-over-year, compared to -36. 7% for Renasant Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the more profitable company, earning 20.

0% net margin versus 12. 6% for Renasant Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRMK leads at 25. 5% versus 15. 7% for RNST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRMK leads at 71. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 43x versus Renasant Corporation's 1. 56x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Renasant Corporation (RNST) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 11. 5x for Trustmark Corporation — 0. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRMK: 1. 3% to $45. 50.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) offers the highest yield at 2. 1%, versus 2. 0% for Renasant Corporation (RNST).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

94), 2. 1% yield, +127. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRMK: +127. 3%, RNST: +47. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.