Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TROO vs MNDY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
TROO vs MNDY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $483M | $3.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14M | $1.23B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-15M | $119M |
| Gross Margin | 20.3% | 89.2% |
| Operating Margin | -55.2% | -0.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 19.0x |
| Total Debt | $4K | $312M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $1.50B |
TROO vs MNDY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TROOPS, Inc. (TROO) | 100 | 179.5 | +79.5% |
| monday.com Ltd. (MNDY) | 100 | 34.2 | -65.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TROO vs MNDY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TROO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 69.7%, EPS growth -76.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.0%
- 25.9% 10Y total return vs MNDY's -57.3%
- 69.7% revenue growth vs MNDY's 26.7%
MNDY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.19
- Lower volatility, beta 1.19, Low D/E 25.0%, current ratio 2.50x
- Beta 1.19, current ratio 2.50x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 69.7% revenue growth vs MNDY's 26.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.6% margin vs TROO's -110.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.19 vs TROO's 1.28 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.2% vs MNDY's -72.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.6% ROA vs TROO's -19.9%, ROIC -2.4% vs -22.3% |
TROO vs MNDY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TROO vs MNDY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MNDY leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MNDY is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 90.3x TROO's $14M. MNDY is the more profitable business, keeping 9.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TROO's -110.9%. On growth, TROO holds the edge at +3.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $14M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $12M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$15M | $119M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $321M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.3% | +89.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -55.2% | -0.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -110.9% | +9.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | +26.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.3% | +24.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
MNDY leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $483M | $3.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $479M | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -19.43x | 34.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 227.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 28.27x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 11.01x | 3.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 700.36x | 12.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MNDY leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MNDY delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-24 for TROO. TROO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MNDY's 0.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MNDY scores 5/9 vs TROO's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -24.3% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -19.9% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -22.3% | -2.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -25.6% | -0.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4,000 | $312M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TROO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TROO five years ago would be worth $26,450 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,271 for MNDY. Over the past 12 months, TROO leads with a +621.0% total return vs MNDY's -72.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TROO at 2.1% vs MNDY's -15.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.9% | -46.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +621.0% | -72.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.4% | -38.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +164.5% | -57.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.9% | -57.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.1% | -15.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TROO and MNDY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNDY is the less volatile stock with a 1.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TROO's 1.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TROO currently trades 84.7% from its 52-week high vs MNDY's 24.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.28x | 1.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.28 | $316.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.53 | $57.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.7% | +24.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.9 | 56.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 221K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $133.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +3.4% |
MNDY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TROO leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
TROO vs MNDY: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TROO or MNDY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TROOPS, Inc.
(TROO) is the stronger pick with 69. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 26. 7% for monday. com Ltd. (MNDY). monday. com Ltd. (MNDY) offers the better valuation at 34. 1x trailing P/E (19. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate monday. com Ltd. (MNDY) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TROO or MNDY?
Over the past 5 years, TROOPS, Inc.
(TROO) delivered a total return of +164. 5%, compared to -57. 3% for monday. com Ltd. (MNDY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TROO returned +25. 9% versus MNDY's -57. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TROO or MNDY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), monday.
com Ltd. (MNDY) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 19β versus TROOPS, Inc. 's 1. 28β — meaning TROO is approximately 8% more volatile than MNDY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TROOPS, Inc. (TROO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 25% for monday. com Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TROO or MNDY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TROOPS, Inc.
(TROO) is pulling ahead at 69. 7% versus 26. 7% for monday. com Ltd. (MNDY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: monday. com Ltd. grew EPS 261. 3% year-over-year, compared to -76. 9% for TROOPS, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TROO leads at 64. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TROO or MNDY?
monday.
com Ltd. (MNDY) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 6% net margin versus -163. 2% for TROOPS, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MNDY leads at -0. 1% versus -94. 1% for TROO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNDY leads at 89. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — TROO or MNDY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is TROO or MNDY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, monday.
com Ltd. (MNDY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 19)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNDY: -57. 3%, TROO: +25. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between TROO and MNDY?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.