TRP vs ET vs ENB vs EPD

For growth investors, Enbridge Inc.

(ENB) is the stronger pick with 21. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 4% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD). Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD) offers the better valuation at 14. 2x trailing P/E (13. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Energy Transfer LP (ET) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Enterprise Products Partners L.

P. (EPD) is the cheapest at 14. 2x versus TC Energy Corporation at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Energy Transfer LP is actually cheaper at 12. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Enbridge Inc. wins at 1. 06x versus Enterprise Products Partners L. P. 's 1. 42x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, Energy Transfer LP (ET) delivered a total return of +158.

2%, compared to +69. 1% for TC Energy Corporation (TRP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRP returned +149. 7% versus ENB's +101. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Enbridge Inc.

(ENB) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 10β versus Energy Transfer LP's 0. 19β — meaning ET is approximately -282% more volatile than ENB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Enbridge Inc. (ENB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 165% for TC Energy Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Enbridge Inc.

(ENB) is pulling ahead at 21. 9% versus -6. 4% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Enbridge Inc. grew EPS 37. 6% year-over-year, compared to -26. 2% for TC Energy Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TRP leads at 7. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

TC Energy Corporation (TRP) is the more profitable company, earning 23.

2% net margin versus 5. 9% for Energy Transfer LP — meaning it keeps 23. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRP leads at 44. 2% versus 11. 4% for ET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRP leads at 50. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Enbridge Inc. (ENB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 06x versus Enterprise Products Partners L. P. 's 1. 42x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Energy Transfer LP (ET) trades at 12. 3x forward P/E versus 17. 9x for Enbridge Inc. — 5. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EPD: -1. 9% to $37. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Energy Transfer LP (ET) offers the highest yield at 6. 5%, versus 0. 4% for Enbridge Inc. (ENB).

For long-horizon retirement investors, TC Energy Corporation (TRP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

01), 3. 8% yield, +149. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRP: +149. 7%, ENB: +101. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TRP is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; ET is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ENB is a mid-cap high-growth stock; EPD is a mid-cap deep-value stock. TRP, ET, EPD pay a dividend while ENB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.