TRS
TriMas Corporation
Packaging & Containers
Market Cap$1.57B
5Y Perf.+75.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TRS vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
Specialty Retail
Market Cap$2.96T
5Y Perf.+125.1%
TRS vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TRS | AMZN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaging & Containers | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $1.57B | $2.96T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $868M | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $909M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 22.8% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | 6.2% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 26.5x | 35.3x |
| Total Debt | $505M | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $86.81B |
TRS vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TRS
AMZN
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TriMas Corporation (TRS) | 100 | 175.9 | +75.9% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 225.1 | +125.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TRS vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TRS leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Amazon.com, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TRS
TriMas Corporation
The Income Pick
TRS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.04, yield 0.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.04, Low D/E 71.6%, current ratio 2.52x
- Beta 1.04, yield 0.4%, current ratio 2.52x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
The Growth Play
AMZN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 29.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs TRS's 148.1%
- 12.4% revenue growth vs TRS's -30.2%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | AMZN | 12.4% revenue growth vs TRS's -30.2% |
| Value | TRS | Lower P/E (26.5x vs 35.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | TRS | 104.7% margin vs AMZN's 12.2% |
| Stability / Safety | TRS | Beta 1.04 vs AMZN's 1.51 |
| Dividends | TRS | 0.4% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TRS | +69.8% vs AMZN's +48.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TRS | 54.6% ROA vs AMZN's 11.5%, ROIC 0.9% vs 14.7% |
TRS vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
TRS vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLAMZNLAGGINGTRS
TRSTriMas Corporation
1leads
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs TRSMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TRS5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
AMZN5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
AMZN5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TRS and AMZN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 855.9x TRS's $868M. TRS is the more profitable business, keeping 104.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMZN's 12.2%. On growth, AMZN holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TRSTriMas Corporation | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $868M | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $112M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $909M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $48M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.8% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +104.7% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -30.4% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +70.3% | +74.8% |
Evenly matched — TRS and AMZN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
TRS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.1x trailing earnings, TRS trades at a 63% valuation discount to AMZN's 38.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMZN's 20.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TRS's 28.7x.
| Metric | TRSTriMas Corporation | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $2.96T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $3.02T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.11x | 38.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.48x | 35.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.37x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 28.73x | 20.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.43x | 4.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.41x | 7.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.67x | 384.26x |
TRS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRS delivers a 101.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $101 in annual profit, vs $23 for AMZN. AMZN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRS's 0.72x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMZN scores 6/9 vs TRS's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | TRSTriMas Corporation | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +101.1% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +54.6% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.9% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.1% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.72x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $475M | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $505M | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.87x | 39.96x |
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,632 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,655 for TRS. Over the past 12 months, TRS leads with a +69.8% total return vs AMZN's +48.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 37.5% vs TRS's 18.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TRSTriMas Corporation | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.8% | +21.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +69.8% | +48.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.0% | +159.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.5% | +66.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +148.1% | +715.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.2% | +37.5% |
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRS and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TRS is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | TRSTriMas Corporation | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.48 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.65 | $183.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.0% | +98.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.0 | 80.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 479K | 45.6M |
Evenly matched — TRS and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TRS as "Buy" and AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 11.6% upside for AMZN (target: $307) vs -8.7% for TRS (target: $38). TRS is the only dividend payer here at 0.39% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | TRSTriMas Corporation | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $38.00 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.16 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.6% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
AMZN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). TRS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallAmazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TRS vs AMZN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TRS or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -30. 2% for TriMas Corporation (TRS). TriMas Corporation (TRS) offers the better valuation at 14. 1x trailing P/E (26. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TriMas Corporation (TRS) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TRS or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, TriMas Corporation (TRS) is the cheapest at 14.
1x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 38. 3x. On forward P/E, TriMas Corporation is actually cheaper at 26. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TRS or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +66. 3%, compared to +26. 5% for TriMas Corporation (TRS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +715. 9% versus TRS's +148. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TRS or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TriMas Corporation (TRS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
04β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 46% more volatile than TRS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 72% for TriMas Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TRS or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus -30. 2% for TriMas Corporation (TRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TriMas Corporation grew EPS 400. 0% year-over-year, compared to 29. 7% for Amazon. com, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMZN leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TRS or AMZN?
TriMas Corporation (TRS) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
6% net margin versus 10. 8% for Amazon. com, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMZN leads at 11. 2% versus 2. 2% for TRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TRS or AMZN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TriMas Corporation (TRS) trades at 26.
5x forward P/E versus 35. 3x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 8. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMZN: 11. 6% to $306. 77.
08Which pays a better dividend — TRS or AMZN?
In this comparison, TRS (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. AMZN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TRS or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TriMas Corporation (TRS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
04), +148. 1% 10Y return). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRS: +148. 1%, AMZN: +715. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TRS and AMZN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TRS is a small-cap deep-value stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(TRS: -30.4% · AMZN: 16.6%)Net Margin>
%
(TRS: 104.7% · AMZN: 12.2%)P/E Ratio<
x
(TRS: 14.1x · AMZN: 38.3x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.