TRS
TriMas Corporation
Packaging & Containers
Market Cap$1.57B
5Y Perf.+75.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TRS vs APTV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
APTV
Aptiv PLC
Auto - Parts
Market Cap$12.11B
5Y Perf.-24.6%
TRS vs APTV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TRS | APTV |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaging & Containers | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $1.57B | $12.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $868M | $20.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $909M | $365M |
| Gross Margin | 22.8% | 19.1% |
| Operating Margin | 6.2% | 5.2% |
| Forward P/E | 26.5x | 8.7x |
| Total Debt | $505M | $8.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $1.85B |
TRS vs APTV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TRS
APTV
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TriMas Corporation (TRS) | 100 | 175.9 | +75.9% |
| Aptiv PLC (APTV) | 100 | 75.4 | -24.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TRS vs APTV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TRS leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Aptiv PLC is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TRS
TriMas Corporation
The Income Pick
TRS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.04, yield 0.4%
- 148.1% 10Y total return vs APTV's 8.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.04, Low D/E 71.6%, current ratio 2.52x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
APTV
Aptiv PLC
The Growth Play
APTV is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.5%, EPS growth -89.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 3.5% revenue growth vs TRS's -30.2%
- Lower P/E (8.7x vs 26.5x)
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | APTV | 3.5% revenue growth vs TRS's -30.2% |
| Value | APTV | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 26.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | TRS | 104.7% margin vs APTV's 1.8% |
| Stability / Safety | TRS | Beta 1.04 vs APTV's 1.44, lower leverage |
| Dividends | TRS | 0.4% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TRS | +69.8% vs APTV's -2.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TRS | 54.6% ROA vs APTV's 1.7%, ROIC 0.9% vs 5.5% |
TRS vs APTV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
TRS vs APTV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTRSLAGGINGAPTV
APTVAptiv PLC
1leads
TRSTriMas Corporation
5leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs APTVMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
TRS5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
APTV5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
TRS5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TRS6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
TRS2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
TRS1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APTV is the larger business by revenue, generating $20.7B annually — 23.8x TRS's $868M. TRS is the more profitable business, keeping 104.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to APTV's 1.8%. On growth, APTV holds the edge at +5.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TRSTriMas Corporation | APTVAptiv PLC |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $868M | $20.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $112M | $1.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $909M | $365M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $48M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.8% | +19.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +5.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +104.7% | +1.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | +5.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -30.4% | +5.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +70.3% | +19.4% |
TRS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
APTV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.1x trailing earnings, TRS trades at a 81% valuation discount to APTV's 75.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, APTV's 8.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TRS's 28.7x.
| Metric | TRSTriMas Corporation | APTVAptiv PLC |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $12.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $18.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.11x | 75.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.48x | 8.70x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 28.73x | 8.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.43x | 0.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.41x | 1.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.67x | 7.92x |
APTV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRS delivers a 101.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $101 in annual profit, vs $4 for APTV. TRS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.72x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to APTV's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), APTV scores 8/9 vs TRS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | TRSTriMas Corporation | APTVAptiv PLC |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +101.1% | +3.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +54.6% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.9% | +5.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.1% | +6.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.72x | 0.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $475M | $6.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $1.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $505M | $8.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.87x | 4.44x |
TRS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRS five years ago would be worth $12,655 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,015 for APTV. Over the past 12 months, TRS leads with a +69.8% total return vs APTV's -2.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRS at 18.2% vs APTV's -15.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TRSTriMas Corporation | APTVAptiv PLC |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.8% | -27.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +69.8% | -2.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.0% | -39.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.5% | -59.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +148.1% | +8.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.2% | -15.4% |
TRS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TRS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TRS is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than APTV's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRS currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs APTV's 63.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TRSTriMas Corporation | APTVAptiv PLC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 1.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.48 | $88.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.65 | $52.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.0% | +63.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.0 | 29.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 479K | 2.6M |
TRS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
TRS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TRS as "Buy" and APTV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 66.8% upside for APTV (target: $95) vs -8.7% for TRS (target: $38). TRS is the only dividend payer here at 0.39% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | TRSTriMas Corporation | APTVAptiv PLC |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $38.00 | $94.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.16 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.6% | +3.3% |
TRS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
TRS leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). APTV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Best OverallTriMas Corporation (TRS)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TRS vs APTV: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TRS or APTV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Aptiv PLC (APTV) is the stronger pick with 3.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -30. 2% for TriMas Corporation (TRS). TriMas Corporation (TRS) offers the better valuation at 14. 1x trailing P/E (26. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TriMas Corporation (TRS) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TRS or APTV?
On trailing P/E, TriMas Corporation (TRS) is the cheapest at 14.
1x versus Aptiv PLC at 75. 7x. On forward P/E, Aptiv PLC is actually cheaper at 8. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TRS or APTV?
Over the past 5 years, TriMas Corporation (TRS) delivered a total return of +26.
5%, compared to -59. 8% for Aptiv PLC (APTV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRS returned +148. 1% versus APTV's +8. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TRS or APTV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TriMas Corporation (TRS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
04β versus Aptiv PLC's 1. 44β — meaning APTV is approximately 39% more volatile than TRS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TriMas Corporation (TRS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 72% versus 85% for Aptiv PLC — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TRS or APTV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Aptiv PLC (APTV) is pulling ahead at 3.
5% versus -30. 2% for TriMas Corporation (TRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TriMas Corporation grew EPS 400. 0% year-over-year, compared to -89. 2% for Aptiv PLC. Over a 3-year CAGR, APTV leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TRS or APTV?
TriMas Corporation (TRS) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
6% net margin versus 0. 8% for Aptiv PLC — meaning it keeps 18. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APTV leads at 5. 8% versus 2. 2% for TRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRS leads at 20. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TRS or APTV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Aptiv PLC (APTV) trades at 8.
7x forward P/E versus 26. 5x for TriMas Corporation — 17. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for APTV: 66. 8% to $94. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — TRS or APTV?
In this comparison, TRS (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. APTV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TRS or APTV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TriMas Corporation (TRS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
04), +148. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRS: +148. 1%, APTV: +8. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TRS and APTV?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TRS is a small-cap deep-value stock; APTV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(TRS: -30.4% · APTV: 5.4%)P/E Ratio<
x
(TRS: 14.1x · APTV: 75.7x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.