Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TRSG vs CLPS vs CNET vs AIXI vs BTBT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Advertising Agencies
Software - Application
Financial - Capital Markets
TRSG vs CLPS vs CNET vs AIXI vs BTBT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Information Technology Services | Advertising Agencies | Software - Application | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $21M | $25M | $2M | $8M | $589M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $27M | $299M | $6M | $115M | $164M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $435K | $-4M | $-2M | $-53M | $137M |
| Gross Margin | 45.4% | 22.8% | 4.8% | 64.3% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 1.7% | -1.4% | -31.7% | -44.2% | 16.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 9.2x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $34M | $122K | $46M | $14M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $28M | $812K | $847K | $95M |
TRSG vs CLPS vs CNET vs AIXI vs BTBT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tungray Technologie… (TRSG) | 100 | 18.9 | -81.1% |
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 94.4 | -5.6% |
| ZW Data Action Tech… (CNET) | 100 | 18.2 | -81.8% |
| Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) | 100 | 6.6 | -93.4% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 89.7 | -10.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TRSG vs CLPS vs CNET vs AIXI vs BTBT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TRSG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- -67.5% 10Y total return vs BTBT's -60.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.07, Low D/E 15.1%, current ratio 1.86x
- Beta 0.07, yield 2.4%, current ratio 1.86x
- Beta 0.07 vs BTBT's 3.37
CLPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
- 14.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs TRSG's 2.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- -5.4% vs AIXI's -79.2%
CNET lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
AIXI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 52.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.3%
BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.
- 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CNET's -49.5%
- 17.3% margin vs AIXI's -45.9%
- 19.0% ROA vs AIXI's -65.3%, ROIC 6.5% vs -34.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CNET's -49.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs AIXI's -45.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.07 vs BTBT's 3.37 | |
| Dividends | 14.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs TRSG's 2.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -5.4% vs AIXI's -79.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.0% ROA vs AIXI's -65.3%, ROIC 6.5% vs -34.4% |
TRSG vs CLPS vs CNET vs AIXI vs BTBT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TRSG vs CLPS vs CNET vs AIXI vs BTBT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories
CLPS leads 2 • TRSG leads 1 • CNET leads 0 • AIXI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTBT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $299M annually — 48.5x CNET's $6M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AIXI's -45.9%. On growth, CLPS holds the edge at +15.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $27M | $299M | $6M | $115M | $164M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $996,367 | -$1M | -$2M | -$49M | $166M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $435,402 | -$4M | -$2M | -$53M | $137M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $0 | -$2M | -$2M | -$448M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.4% | +22.8% | +4.8% | +64.3% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | -1.4% | -31.7% | -44.2% | +16.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | -1.3% | -33.4% | -45.9% | +17.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -11.4% | -2.3% | -27.3% | -2.0% | -65.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.1% | +15.3% | -47.0% | -64.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -55.3% | +75.8% | +95.7% | -29.9% | +2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TRSG and CNET and AIXI each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $25M | $2M | $8M | $589M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15M | $31M | $1M | $53M | $508M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -59.09x | -3.48x | -0.38x | -0.45x | 9.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 8.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.66x | 0.15x | 0.12x | 0.11x | 3.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.23x | 0.43x | 0.38x | — | 0.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-60 for CNET. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLPS's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.5% | -6.1% | -60.3% | — | +21.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | -3.2% | -21.3% | -65.3% | +19.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.2% | -7.9% | -64.7% | -34.4% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.5% | -9.8% | -73.5% | -3.4% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 0.59x | 0.03x | — | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6M | $6M | -$690,000 | $45M | -$81M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $28M | $812,000 | $846,593 | $95M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $34M | $122,000 | $46M | $14M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.59x | — | — | -14.13x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CLPS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRSG five years ago would be worth $3,250 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $138 for AIXI. Over the past 12 months, CLPS leads with a -5.4% total return vs AIXI's -79.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLPS at 0.2% vs AIXI's -75.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.4% | -10.3% | -44.4% | +68.1% | -10.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -25.7% | -5.4% | -55.1% | -79.2% | -9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.5% | +0.5% | -89.0% | -98.6% | -19.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.5% | -69.3% | -97.9% | -98.6% | -84.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.5% | -78.5% | -97.8% | -98.6% | -60.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -31.2% | +0.2% | -52.1% | -75.9% | -7.1% |
Risk & Volatility
TRSG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TRSG is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRSG currently trades 65.0% from its 52-week high vs AIXI's 18.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.07x | 0.27x | 1.18x | 0.94x | 3.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.00 | $1.88 | $2.78 | $4.02 | $4.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.02 | $0.80 | $0.57 | $0.08 | $1.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.0% | +48.2% | +25.2% | +18.0% | +40.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.8 | 49.8 | 50.7 | 49.3 | 69.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 15K | 11K | 60.6M | 18.5M |
Analyst Outlook
CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, CLPS offers the higher dividend yield at 14.60% vs BTBT's 0.31%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | — | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | +14.6% | — | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.03 | $0.13 | — | — | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CLPS leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
TRSG vs CLPS vs CNET vs AIXI vs BTBT: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TRSG or CLPS or CNET or AIXI or BTBT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 5% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TRSG or CLPS or CNET or AIXI or BTBT?
Over the past 5 years, Tungray Technologies Inc Class A Ordinary Shares (TRSG) delivered a total return of -67.
5%, compared to -98. 6% for Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BTBT returned -60. 4% versus AIXI's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TRSG or CLPS or CNET or AIXI or BTBT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tungray Technologies Inc Class A Ordinary Shares (TRSG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
07β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately 4511% more volatile than TRSG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 59% for CLPS Incorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TRSG or CLPS or CNET or AIXI or BTBT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -49. 5% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIXI leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TRSG or CLPS or CNET or AIXI or BTBT?
Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -24. 4% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -24. 3% for CNET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AIXI leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — TRSG or CLPS or CNET or AIXI or BTBT?
In this comparison, CLPS (14.
6% yield), TRSG (2. 4% yield), BTBT (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. CNET, AIXI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is TRSG or CLPS or CNET or AIXI or BTBT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tungray Technologies Inc Class A Ordinary Shares (TRSG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
07), 2. 4% yield). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRSG: -67. 5%, BTBT: -60. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between TRSG and CLPS and CNET and AIXI and BTBT?
These companies operate in different sectors (TRSG (Industrials) and CLPS (Technology) and CNET (Communication Services) and AIXI (Technology) and BTBT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TRSG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CNET is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AIXI is a small-cap high-growth stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock. TRSG, CLPS pay a dividend while CNET, AIXI, BTBT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.