Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TRST vs NBTB vs CBSH vs FIS vs JKHY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
TRST vs NBTB vs CBSH vs FIS vs JKHY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $858M | $2.35B | $7.71B | $24.47B | $10.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $278M | $867M | $2.14B | $10.89B | $2.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $61M | $169M | $566M | $382M | $519M |
| Gross Margin | 67.1% | 72.1% | 80.0% | 38.1% | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | 29.2% | 25.3% | 34.2% | 17.5% | 26.0% |
| Forward P/E | 16.9x | 10.8x | 13.0x | 7.5x | 21.8x |
| Total Debt | $193M | $327M | $3.00B | $4.01B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $51M | $185M | $803M | $599M | $102M |
TRST vs NBTB vs CBSH vs FIS vs JKHY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) | 100 | 153.7 | +53.7% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Commerce Bancshares… (CBSH) | 100 | 105.1 | +5.1% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
| Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY) | 100 | 80.7 | -19.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TRST vs NBTB vs CBSH vs FIS vs JKHY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TRST ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +60.3% vs FIS's -35.3%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 102.2% 10Y total return vs TRST's 97.2%
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CBSH's 2.2%
CBSH is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.4% vs TRST's 2.6%
- 26.5% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
FIS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.31 vs TRST's 4.66
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 21.8x), PEG 0.31 vs 2.16
- 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.5%
JKHY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 32 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 1.5%
- Rev growth 7.2%, EPS growth 19.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, current ratio 1.27x
- Beta 0.28, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.27x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CBSH's 2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 21.8x), PEG 0.31 vs 2.16 | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.5% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs NBTB's 0.89 | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.3% vs FIS's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.0% ROA vs TRST's 1.0%, ROIC 21.0% vs 7.2% |
TRST vs NBTB vs CBSH vs FIS vs JKHY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TRST vs NBTB vs CBSH vs FIS vs JKHY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CBSH leads in 1 of 6 categories
FIS leads 1 • JKHY leads 1 • TRST leads 1 • NBTB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CBSH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 39.1x TRST's $278M. CBSH is the more profitable business, keeping 26.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $278M | $867M | $2.1B | $10.9B | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $90M | $241M | $796M | $3.8B | $810M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $61M | $169M | $566M | $382M | $519M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $46M | $225M | $570M | $2.8B | $728M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.1% | +72.1% | +80.0% | +38.1% | +44.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.2% | +25.3% | +34.2% | +17.5% | +26.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | +19.5% | +26.5% | +3.5% | +20.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | +25.2% | +27.7% | +26.1% | +28.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +8.2% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.1% | +39.5% | +1.0% | +92.3% | +12.5% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.9x trailing earnings, CBSH trades at a 80% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CBSH offers better value at 1.14x vs TRST's 4.11x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $858M | $2.4B | $7.7B | $24.5B | $10.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1000M | $2.5B | $9.9B | $27.9B | $10.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.90x | 13.53x | 12.86x | 63.00x | 23.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.87x | 10.80x | 13.01x | 7.54x | 21.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.11x | 1.92x | 1.14x | 2.58x | 2.32x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.14x | 10.35x | 12.87x | 7.66x | 13.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.08x | 2.71x | 3.60x | 2.29x | 4.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.29x | 1.21x | 1.91x | 1.76x | 5.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.75x | 10.75x | 13.01x | 9.97x | 17.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CBSH's 0.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRST scores 7/9 vs JKHY's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.9% | +9.5% | +15.3% | +2.7% | +24.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +1.1% | +1.7% | +1.1% | +17.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.2% | +7.9% | +8.4% | +6.0% | +21.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.8% | +2.4% | +2.3% | +6.6% | +22.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 0.17x | 0.79x | 0.29x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $142M | $142M | $2.2B | $3.4B | -$102M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $51M | $185M | $803M | $599M | $102M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $193M | $327M | $3.0B | $4.0B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.90x | 1.05x | 1.97x | 4.64x | 122.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRST leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRST five years ago would be worth $14,654 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, TRST leads with a +60.3% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRST at 23.5% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.2% | +9.3% | +1.0% | -27.3% | -17.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +60.3% | +9.0% | -13.9% | -35.3% | -13.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.2% | +54.1% | +20.2% | -6.6% | -1.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.5% | +29.9% | -12.9% | -63.2% | +0.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.2% | +102.2% | +103.4% | -13.2% | +94.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.5% | +15.5% | +6.3% | -2.2% | -0.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRST and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JKHY is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRST currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 0.89x | 0.70x | 0.76x | 0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $49.11 | $46.92 | $66.35 | $82.74 | $193.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $30.17 | $39.20 | $46.99 | $43.30 | $141.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.6% | +96.1% | +79.1% | +57.1% | +75.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.5 | 57.3 | 61.7 | 43.3 | 28.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 112K | 236K | 1.2M | 5.5M | 902K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FIS and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TRST as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", CBSH as "Hold", FIS as "Buy", JKHY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs 2.1% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs JKHY's 1.54%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.00 | $58.50 | $67.38 | $203.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 10 | 15 | 37 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.1% | +3.2% | +2.1% | +3.5% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 32 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.51 | $1.43 | $1.08 | $1.63 | $2.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.4% | +0.4% | +2.7% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
CBSH leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
TRST vs NBTB vs CBSH vs FIS vs JKHY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TRST or NBTB or CBSH or FIS or JKHY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 2% for Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH). Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH) offers the better valuation at 12. 9x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TRST or NBTB or CBSH or FIS or JKHY?
On trailing P/E, Commerce Bancshares, Inc.
(CBSH) is the cheapest at 12. 9x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 4. 66x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TRST or NBTB or CBSH or FIS or JKHY?
Over the past 5 years, TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) delivered a total return of +46.
5%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CBSH returned +103. 4% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TRST or NBTB or CBSH or FIS or JKHY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 89β — meaning NBTB is approximately 214% more volatile than JKHY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 79% for Commerce Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TRST or NBTB or CBSH or FIS or JKHY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus 2. 2% for Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TrustCo Bank Corp NY grew EPS 26. 5% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JKHY leads at 6. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TRST or NBTB or CBSH or FIS or JKHY?
Commerce Bancshares, Inc.
(CBSH) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 5% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CBSH leads at 34. 2% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CBSH leads at 80. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TRST or NBTB or CBSH or FIS or JKHY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 4. 66x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 21. 8x for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. — 14. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — TRST or NBTB or CBSH or FIS or JKHY?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 1. 5% for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. (JKHY).
09Is TRST or NBTB or CBSH or FIS or JKHY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 1. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JKHY: +94. 9%, NBTB: +102. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TRST and NBTB and CBSH and FIS and JKHY?
These companies operate in different sectors (TRST (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and CBSH (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and JKHY (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TRST is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CBSH is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; JKHY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.