Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TRUG vs PLBY vs MANU vs ACHR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Leisure
Entertainment
Aerospace & Defense
TRUG vs PLBY vs MANU vs ACHR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Leisure | Entertainment | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $1M | $188M | $3.30B | $4.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19M | $121M | $655M | $300K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-15M | $-13M | $-9M | $-618M |
| Gross Margin | 50.4% | 71.0% | 64.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -32.3% | -6.3% | 2.8% | -2431.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.8x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $6M | $24M | $645M | $42M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $38M | $86M | $1.02B |
TRUG vs PLBY vs MANU vs ACHR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TruGolf Holdings, I… (TRUG) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Playboy, Inc. (PLBY) | 100 | 6.3 | -93.7% |
| Manchester United p… (MANU) | 100 | 134.3 | +34.3% |
| Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) | 100 | 104.0 | +4.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TRUG vs PLBY vs MANU vs ACHR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TRUG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.20
- Lower volatility, beta 0.20, current ratio 1.07x
- Beta 0.20, current ratio 1.07x
- Beta 0.20 vs ACHR's 2.96
PLBY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 4.1%, EPS growth 87.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -13.3%
- 4.1% revenue growth vs ACHR's -13.8%
- +54.6% vs TRUG's -98.3%
MANU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 19.9% 10Y total return vs ACHR's -37.0%
- -1.4% margin vs ACHR's -2.1K%
- -0.5% ROA vs TRUG's -69.0%
ACHR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.1% revenue growth vs ACHR's -13.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | -1.4% margin vs ACHR's -2.1K% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.20 vs ACHR's 2.96 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.6% vs TRUG's -98.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.5% ROA vs TRUG's -69.0% |
TRUG vs PLBY vs MANU vs ACHR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TRUG vs PLBY vs MANU vs ACHR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MANU leads in 2 of 6 categories
TRUG leads 1 • PLBY leads 0 • ACHR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PLBY and MANU each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MANU is the larger business by revenue, generating $655M annually — 2184.7x ACHR's $300,000. MANU is the more profitable business, keeping -1.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACHR's -2060.7%. On growth, MANU holds the edge at -4.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19M | $121M | $655M | $300,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $684,000 | $238M | -$709M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$15M | -$13M | -$9M | -$618M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | -$1M | -$135M | -$512M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.4% | +71.0% | +64.8% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -32.3% | -6.3% | +2.8% | -2431.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -80.7% | -10.5% | -1.4% | -2060.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -27.2% | -0.8% | -20.6% | -1705.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -24.7% | -58.1% | -4.2% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -177.8% | +120.8% | +115.1% | +43.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TRUG and MANU each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MANU's 15.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PLBY's 34.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $188M | $3.3B | $4.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$3M | $174M | $4.1B | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.04x | -12.85x | -74.04x | -6.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.78x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 34.02x | 15.41x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.06x | 1.56x | 3.64x | 9999.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.15x | 9.22x | 12.53x | 1.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 86.79x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MANU leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MANU delivers a -4.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-5 in annual profit, vs $-6 for TRUG. ACHR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MANU's 3.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLBY scores 6/9 vs TRUG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.9% | -2.5% | -4.8% | -37.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -69.0% | -4.6% | -0.5% | -32.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -2.9% | -2.0% | -89.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -170.8% | -1.4% | -2.1% | -44.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.37x | 1.30x | 3.33x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$14M | $559M | -$979M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $38M | $86M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $24M | $645M | $42M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.68x | -0.39x | 0.62x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MANU leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MANU five years ago would be worth $11,659 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for TRUG. Over the past 12 months, PLBY leads with a +54.6% total return vs TRUG's -98.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACHR at 43.2% vs TRUG's -92.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -67.5% | -9.2% | +21.2% | -22.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -98.3% | +54.6% | +32.7% | -26.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -8.7% | +2.2% | +193.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -96.6% | +16.6% | -36.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -83.1% | +19.9% | -37.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -92.5% | -3.0% | +0.7% | +43.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRUG and MANU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TRUG is the less volatile stock with a 0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACHR's 2.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MANU currently trades 97.4% from its 52-week high vs TRUG's 1.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.20x | 1.96x | 0.92x | 2.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $210.00 | $2.75 | $19.65 | $14.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.79 | $1.06 | $13.22 | $4.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.1% | +60.7% | +97.4% | +43.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.7 | 45.9 | 64.2 | 61.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 136K | 775K | 307K | 27.6M |
Analyst Outlook
TRUG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PLBY as "Buy", MANU as "Hold", ACHR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 656.3% upside for PLBY (target: $13) vs -6.2% for MANU (target: $18).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $12.63 | $17.95 | $12.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 | 10 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MANU leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). TRUG leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.
TRUG vs PLBY vs MANU vs ACHR: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TRUG or PLBY or MANU or ACHR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Playboy, Inc.
(PLBY) is the stronger pick with 4. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 6% for TruGolf Holdings, Inc. (TRUG). Analysts rate Playboy, Inc. (PLBY) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TRUG or PLBY or MANU or ACHR?
Over the past 5 years, Manchester United plc (MANU) delivered a total return of +16.
6%, compared to -100. 0% for TruGolf Holdings, Inc. (TRUG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MANU returned +19. 9% versus TRUG's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TRUG or PLBY or MANU or ACHR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TruGolf Holdings, Inc.
(TRUG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 20β versus Archer Aviation Inc. 's 2. 96β — meaning ACHR is approximately 1353% more volatile than TRUG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 3% for Manchester United plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TRUG or PLBY or MANU or ACHR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Playboy, Inc.
(PLBY) is pulling ahead at 4. 1% versus -13. 6% for TruGolf Holdings, Inc. (TRUG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Playboy, Inc. grew EPS 87. 5% year-over-year, compared to -100. 7% for TruGolf Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MANU leads at 4. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TRUG or PLBY or MANU or ACHR?
Manchester United plc (MANU) is the more profitable company, earning -5.
0% net margin versus -2060. 7% for Archer Aviation Inc. — meaning it keeps -5. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLBY leads at -2. 7% versus -2431. 0% for ACHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MANU leads at 82. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is TRUG or PLBY or MANU or ACHR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLBY: 656.
3% to $12. 63.
07Which pays a better dividend — TRUG or PLBY or MANU or ACHR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is TRUG or PLBY or MANU or ACHR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TruGolf Holdings, Inc.
(TRUG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 20)). Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) carries a higher beta of 2. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRUG: -100. 0%, ACHR: -37. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TRUG and PLBY and MANU and ACHR?
These companies operate in different sectors (TRUG (Technology) and PLBY (Consumer Cyclical) and MANU (Communication Services) and ACHR (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.