Gold
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TRX vs GLDG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gold
TRX vs GLDG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Gold |
| Market Cap | $355M | $250M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $98M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $-15M |
| Gross Margin | 47.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 35.2% | — |
| Forward P/E | 70.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $5M | $387K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $12M |
TRX vs GLDG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) | 100 | 144.7 | +44.7% |
| GoldMining Inc. (GLDG) | 100 | 106.2 | +6.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TRX vs GLDG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TRX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 164.5% 10Y total return vs GLDG's 6.3%
- 41.4% revenue growth vs GLDG's 35.5%
- +289.2% vs GLDG's +48.9%
GLDG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.36
- EPS growth 19.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.36, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 3.14x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 41.4% revenue growth vs GLDG's 35.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.5% margin vs TRX's -6.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.36 vs TRX's 1.79, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +289.2% vs GLDG's +48.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.5% ROA vs GLDG's -8.3%, ROIC 15.5% vs -18.3% |
TRX vs GLDG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRX and GLDG operate at a comparable scale, with $98M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $98M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $40M | -$24M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | -$15M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6M | -$30M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.1% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +35.2% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.5% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +103.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +104.2% |
Valuation Metrics
GLDG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $355M | $250M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $348M | $241M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -12.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 70.29x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.54x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.11x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.54x | 2.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 187.70x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TRX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRX delivers a -6.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-9 for GLDG. GLDG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRX's 0.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRX scores 5/9 vs GLDG's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.1% | -8.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.5% | -8.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.5% | -18.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.3% | -20.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$9M | -$11M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $12M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $387,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.73x | -113.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRX five years ago would be worth $21,964 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,391 for GLDG. Over the past 12 months, TRX leads with a +289.2% total return vs GLDG's +48.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRX at 28.2% vs GLDG's 3.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +36.7% | -4.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +289.2% | +48.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.8% | +11.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +119.6% | -26.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +164.5% | +6.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.2% | +3.6% |
Risk & Volatility
GLDG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GLDG is the less volatile stock with a 1.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRX's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GLDG currently trades 52.4% from its 52-week high vs TRX's 43.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.79x | 1.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.80 | $2.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.30 | $0.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.9% | +52.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.1 | 46.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.4M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TRX as "Buy" and GLDG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 135.3% upside for GLDG (target: $3) vs 52.8% for TRX (target: $2).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1.88 | $2.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% |
GLDG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). TRX leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
TRX vs GLDG: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TRX or GLDG a better buy right now?
Analysts rate TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison.
The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TRX or GLDG?
Over the past 5 years, TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) delivered a total return of +119.
6%, compared to -26. 1% for GoldMining Inc. (GLDG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRX returned +164. 5% versus GLDG's +6. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TRX or GLDG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GoldMining Inc.
(GLDG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 36β versus TRX Gold Corporation's 1. 79β — meaning TRX is approximately 32% more volatile than GLDG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, GoldMining Inc. (GLDG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 4% for TRX Gold Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — TRX or GLDG?
TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) is the more profitable company, earning 1.
2% net margin versus 0. 0% for GoldMining Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRX leads at 27. 5% versus 0. 0% for GLDG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRX leads at 41. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Is TRX or GLDG more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GLDG: 135.
3% to $2. 80.
06Which pays a better dividend — TRX or GLDG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is TRX or GLDG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, GoldMining Inc.
(GLDG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GLDG: +6. 3%, TRX: +164. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between TRX and GLDG?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; GLDG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.