Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TRX vs GLDG vs GORO vs AEM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TRX
TRX Gold Corporation

Gold

Basic MaterialsAMEX • CA
Market Cap$355M
5Y Perf.+44.7%
GLDG
GoldMining Inc.

Gold

Basic MaterialsAMEX • CA
Market Cap$250M
5Y Perf.+6.2%
GORO
Gold Resource Corporation

Gold

Basic MaterialsAMEX • US
Market Cap$231M
5Y Perf.-63.3%
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$94.03B
5Y Perf.+193.3%

TRX vs GLDG vs GORO vs AEM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TRX logoTRX
GLDG logoGLDG
GORO logoGORO
AEM logoAEM
IndustryGoldGoldGoldGold
Market Cap$355M$250M$231M$94.03B
Revenue (TTM)$98M$0.00$93M$11.87B
Net Income (TTM)$-6M$-15M$-6M$4.45B
Gross Margin47.1%18.9%57.3%
Operating Margin35.2%13.1%52.9%
Forward P/E70.3x28.6x13.5x
Total Debt$5M$387K$91M$321M
Cash & Equiv.$15M$12M$25M$2.87B

TRX vs GLDG vs GORO vs AEMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TRX
GLDG
GORO
AEM
StockMay 20May 26Return
TRX Gold Corporation (TRX)100144.7+44.7%
GoldMining Inc. (GLDG)100106.2+6.2%
Gold Resource Corpo… (GORO)10036.7-63.3%
Agnico Eagle Mines … (AEM)100293.3+193.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TRX vs GLDG vs GORO vs AEM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AEM leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Gold Resource Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. TRX also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TRX
TRX Gold Corporation
The Momentum Pick

TRX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +289.2% vs GLDG's +48.9%
Best for: momentum
GLDG
GoldMining Inc.
The Defensive Pick

GLDG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.36, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 3.14x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
GORO
Gold Resource Corporation
The Growth Play

GORO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and defensive is your priority.

  • Rev growth 44.0%, EPS growth 92.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -12.5%
  • Beta 0.38, current ratio 2.85x
  • 44.0% revenue growth vs GLDG's 35.5%
  • Beta 0.38 vs TRX's 1.79
Best for: growth exposure and defensive
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
The Income Pick

AEM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 0.8%
  • 351.2% 10Y total return vs TRX's 164.5%
  • Lower P/E (13.5x vs 28.6x)
  • 37.5% margin vs GORO's -6.9%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGORO logoGORO44.0% revenue growth vs GLDG's 35.5%
ValueAEM logoAEMLower P/E (13.5x vs 28.6x)
Quality / MarginsAEM logoAEM37.5% margin vs GORO's -6.9%
Stability / SafetyGORO logoGOROBeta 0.38 vs TRX's 1.79
DividendsAEM logoAEM0.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)TRX logoTRX+289.2% vs GLDG's +48.9%
Efficiency (ROA)AEM logoAEM13.7% ROA vs GLDG's -8.3%, ROIC 21.9% vs -18.3%

TRX vs GLDG vs GORO vs AEM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TRXTRX Gold Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

GLDGGoldMining Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

GOROGold Resource Corporation
FY 2025
Concentrate
48.4%$92M
Silver Concentrate
34.8%$66M
Gold Concentrate
8.7%$17M
Zinc Concentrate
4.4%$8M
Copper Concentrate
1.3%$2M
Lead Concentrate
1.0%$2M
Dore
0.7%$1M
Other (2)
0.7%$1M
AEMAgnico Eagle Mines Limited
FY 2013
Gold
91.5%$1.5B
Silver
6.2%$101M
Copper
1.3%$21M
Zinc
1.0%$17M
Lead
0.1%$900,000

TRX vs GLDG vs GORO vs AEM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAEMLAGGINGGLDG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AEM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

AEM and GLDG operate at a comparable scale, with $11.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. AEM is the more profitable business, keeping 37.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GORO's -6.9%. On growth, GORO holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTRX logoTRXTRX Gold Corporat…GLDG logoGLDGGoldMining Inc.GORO logoGOROGold Resource Cor…AEM logoAEMAgnico Eagle Mine…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$98M$0$93M$11.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$40M-$24M$25M$7.9B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$6M-$15M-$6M$4.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$6M-$30M-$4M$4.4B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+47.1%+18.9%+57.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+35.2%+13.1%+52.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-6.5%-6.9%+37.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+6.0%-4.2%+37.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+103.5%+2.5%+64.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+104.2%+193.3%+199.0%
AEM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

AEM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, AEM's 11.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TRX's 17.5x.

MetricTRX logoTRXTRX Gold Corporat…GLDG logoGLDGGoldMining Inc.GORO logoGOROGold Resource Cor…AEM logoAEMAgnico Eagle Mine…
Market CapShares × price$355M$250M$231M$94.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$348M$241M$297M$91.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-12.09x-30.43x21.18x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.70.29x28.60x13.47x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.63x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple17.54x11.93x11.47x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue6.11x2.48x7.90x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.54x2.65x4.46x3.82x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF187.70x359.20x22.06x
AEM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AEM leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

AEM delivers a 19.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-23 for GORO. GLDG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GORO's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AEM scores 8/9 vs GLDG's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricTRX logoTRXTRX Gold Corporat…GLDG logoGLDGGoldMining Inc.GORO logoGOROGold Resource Cor…AEM logoAEMAgnico Eagle Mine…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-6.1%-8.5%-22.7%+19.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-3.5%-8.3%-4.0%+13.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+15.5%-18.3%+13.5%+21.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+15.3%-20.8%+8.2%+20.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95278
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.04x0.00x2.07x0.01x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$9M-$11M$66M-$2.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$15M$12M$25M$2.9B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5M$387,000$91M$321M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense8.73x-113.47x0.73x73.32x
AEM leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AEM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AEM five years ago would be worth $28,328 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,415 for GORO. Over the past 12 months, TRX leads with a +289.2% total return vs GLDG's +48.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AEM at 48.0% vs GLDG's 3.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTRX logoTRXTRX Gold Corporat…GLDG logoGLDGGoldMining Inc.GORO logoGOROGold Resource Cor…AEM logoAEMAgnico Eagle Mine…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+36.7%-4.8%+70.2%+10.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+289.2%+48.9%+143.4%+61.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+110.8%+11.2%+50.5%+224.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+119.6%-26.1%-45.8%+183.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+164.5%+6.3%-47.8%+351.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+28.2%+3.6%+14.6%+48.0%
AEM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

GORO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

GORO is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRX's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GORO currently trades 76.5% from its 52-week high vs TRX's 43.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTRX logoTRXTRX Gold Corporat…GLDG logoGLDGGoldMining Inc.GORO logoGOROGold Resource Cor…AEM logoAEMAgnico Eagle Mine…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.79x1.36x0.38x0.52x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.80$2.27$1.87$255.24
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.30$0.72$0.43$103.38
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+43.9%+52.4%+76.5%+73.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.146.347.943.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded4.4M2.1M1.8M2.5M
GORO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

AEM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: TRX as "Buy", GLDG as "Buy", GORO as "Buy", AEM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 135.3% upside for GLDG (target: $3) vs 26.6% for AEM (target: $238). AEM is the only dividend payer here at 0.77% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricTRX logoTRXTRX Gold Corporat…GLDG logoGLDGGoldMining Inc.GORO logoGOROGold Resource Cor…AEM logoAEMAgnico Eagle Mine…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$1.88$2.80$2.00$237.71
# AnalystsCovering analysts11431
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises02
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.45
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.2%0.0%0.0%+0.7%
AEM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

AEM leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). GORO leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallAgnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TRX vs GLDG vs GORO vs AEM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TRX or GLDG or GORO or AEM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Gold Resource Corporation (GORO) is the stronger pick with 44.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 41. 4% for TRX Gold Corporation (TRX). Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) offers the better valuation at 21. 2x trailing P/E (13. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TRX or GLDG or GORO or AEM?

On forward P/E, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited is actually cheaper at 13.

5x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TRX or GLDG or GORO or AEM?

Over the past 5 years, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) delivered a total return of +183.

3%, compared to -45. 8% for Gold Resource Corporation (GORO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEM returned +351. 2% versus GORO's -47. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TRX or GLDG or GORO or AEM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gold Resource Corporation (GORO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

38β versus TRX Gold Corporation's 1. 79β — meaning TRX is approximately 377% more volatile than GORO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, GoldMining Inc. (GLDG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for Gold Resource Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TRX or GLDG or GORO or AEM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gold Resource Corporation (GORO) is pulling ahead at 44.

0% versus 41. 4% for TRX Gold Corporation (TRX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Agnico Eagle Mines Limited grew EPS 134. 4% year-over-year, compared to 19. 5% for GoldMining Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TRX leads at 60. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TRX or GLDG or GORO or AEM?

Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is the more profitable company, earning 37.

5% net margin versus -6. 9% for Gold Resource Corporation — meaning it keeps 37. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AEM leads at 53. 1% versus 0. 0% for GLDG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEM leads at 58. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TRX or GLDG or GORO or AEM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) trades at 13.

5x forward P/E versus 70. 3x for TRX Gold Corporation — 56. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GLDG: 135. 3% to $2. 80.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TRX or GLDG or GORO or AEM?

In this comparison, AEM (0.

8% yield) pays a dividend. TRX, GLDG, GORO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is TRX or GLDG or GORO or AEM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

52), 0. 8% yield, +351. 2% 10Y return). TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AEM: +351. 2%, TRX: +164. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TRX and GLDG and GORO and AEM?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; GLDG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GORO is a small-cap high-growth stock; AEM is a mid-cap high-growth stock. AEM pays a dividend while TRX, GLDG, GORO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TRX

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 51%
  • Gross Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GLDG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GORO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 122%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AEM

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 32%
  • Net Margin > 22%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.