Gold
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TRX vs SBSW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gold
TRX vs SBSW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Gold |
| Market Cap | $355M | $9.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $98M | $238.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $-12.39B |
| Gross Margin | 47.1% | 21.2% |
| Operating Margin | 35.2% | 18.9% |
| Forward P/E | 70.3x | 0.2x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $44.34B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $17.16B |
TRX vs SBSW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) | 100 | 144.7 | +44.7% |
| Sibanye Stillwater … (SBSW) | 100 | 179.7 | +79.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TRX vs SBSW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TRX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 41.4%, EPS growth -5.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 60.4%
- 164.5% 10Y total return vs SBSW's 30.7%
- 41.4% revenue growth vs SBSW's 7.1%
SBSW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.27, yield 0.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 1.27, yield 0.2%, current ratio 1.78x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 41.4% revenue growth vs SBSW's 7.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.2x vs 70.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -5.2% margin vs TRX's -6.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.27 vs TRX's 1.79 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +289.2% vs SBSW's +167.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.5% ROA vs SBSW's -8.3%, ROIC 15.5% vs 22.9% |
TRX vs SBSW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TRX vs SBSW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRX leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SBSW is the larger business by revenue, generating $238.3B annually — 2436.1x TRX's $98M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -5.2% (SBSW) to -6.5% (TRX). On growth, TRX holds the edge at +103.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $98M | $238.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $40M | $63.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | -$12.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6M | -$9.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.1% | +21.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +35.2% | +18.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.5% | -5.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | -4.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +103.5% | +25.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -10.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SBSW leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SBSW's 5.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TRX's 17.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $355M | $9.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $348M | $11.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -31.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 70.29x | 0.25x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.54x | 5.67x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.11x | 1.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.54x | 3.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 187.70x | 90.73x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TRX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRX delivers a -6.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-28 for SBSW. TRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SBSW's 1.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SBSW scores 6/9 vs TRX's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.1% | -28.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.5% | -8.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.5% | +22.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.3% | +19.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 1.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$9M | $27.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $17.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $44.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.73x | 1.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRX five years ago would be worth $21,964 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,014 for SBSW. Over the past 12 months, TRX leads with a +289.2% total return vs SBSW's +167.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRX at 28.2% vs SBSW's 12.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +36.7% | -6.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +289.2% | +167.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.8% | +40.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +119.6% | -19.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +164.5% | +30.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.2% | +12.1% |
Risk & Volatility
SBSW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SBSW is the less volatile stock with a 1.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRX's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBSW currently trades 62.0% from its 52-week high vs TRX's 43.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.79x | 1.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.80 | $21.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.30 | $4.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.9% | +62.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.1 | 57.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.4M | 5.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TRX as "Buy" and SBSW as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 52.8% upside for TRX (target: $2) vs 38.5% for SBSW (target: $18). SBSW is the only dividend payer here at 0.18% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1.88 | $18.27 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% |
TRX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SBSW leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
TRX vs SBSW: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TRX or SBSW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) is the stronger pick with 41.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 1% for Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW). Analysts rate TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TRX or SBSW?
Over the past 5 years, TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) delivered a total return of +119.
6%, compared to -19. 9% for Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRX returned +164. 5% versus SBSW's +30. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TRX or SBSW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
27β versus TRX Gold Corporation's 1. 79β — meaning TRX is approximately 41% more volatile than SBSW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 100% for Sibanye Stillwater Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TRX or SBSW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) is pulling ahead at 41.
4% versus 7. 1% for Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW). Over a 3-year CAGR, TRX leads at 60. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TRX or SBSW?
TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) is the more profitable company, earning 1.
2% net margin versus -4. 0% for Sibanye Stillwater Limited — meaning it keeps 1. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRX leads at 27. 5% versus 18. 5% for SBSW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRX leads at 41. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is TRX or SBSW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW) trades at 0.
2x forward P/E versus 70. 3x for TRX Gold Corporation — 70. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRX: 52. 8% to $1. 88.
07Which pays a better dividend — TRX or SBSW?
In this comparison, SBSW (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. TRX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is TRX or SBSW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
27)). TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBSW: +30. 7%, TRX: +164. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TRX and SBSW?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; SBSW is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.