Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TSAT vs AMC vs SATS vs CNK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Communication Equipment
Entertainment
TSAT vs AMC vs SATS vs CNK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Entertainment | Communication Equipment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $769M | $930M | $35.26B | $3.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $418M | $5.03B | $15.00B | $3.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-155M | $-547M | $-23.28B | $138M |
| Gross Margin | 80.3% | 75.3% | 37.1% | 40.7% |
| Operating Margin | 14.7% | 46.5% | -118.1% | 11.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $3.53B | $8.14B | $31.01B | $3.78B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $494M | $429M | $1.88B | $344M |
TSAT vs AMC vs SATS vs CNK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Telesat Corporation (TSAT) | 100 | 278.0 | +178.0% |
| AMC Entertainment H… (AMC) | 100 | 3.0 | -97.0% |
| EchoStar Corporation (SATS) | 100 | 393.5 | +293.5% |
| Cinemark Holdings, … (CNK) | 100 | 182.8 | +82.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TSAT vs AMC vs SATS vs CNK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TSAT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.30
AMC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 4.6%, EPS growth -16.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.4%
- 4.6% revenue growth vs TSAT's -26.9%
SATS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 209.8% 10Y total return vs TSAT's 69.2%
- +405.6% vs AMC's -43.9%
CNK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.22, current ratio 0.71x
- Beta 0.22, yield 1.1%, current ratio 0.71x
- 4.4% margin vs SATS's -155.1%
- Beta 0.22 vs TSAT's 2.30
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.6% revenue growth vs TSAT's -26.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.4% margin vs SATS's -155.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs TSAT's 2.30 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +405.6% vs AMC's -43.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.0% ROA vs SATS's -44.6%, ROIC 7.5% vs -32.9% |
TSAT vs AMC vs SATS vs CNK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TSAT vs AMC vs SATS vs CNK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMC leads in 1 of 6 categories
CNK leads 1 • SATS leads 1 • TSAT leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SATS is the larger business by revenue, generating $15.0B annually — 35.9x TSAT's $418M. CNK is the more profitable business, keeping 4.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SATS's -155.1%. On growth, AMC holds the edge at +21.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $418M | $5.0B | $15.0B | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $210M | $2.6B | -$16.1B | $545M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$155M | -$547M | -$23.3B | $138M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$351M | -$124M | -$1.1B | $177M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.3% | +75.3% | +37.1% | +40.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | +46.5% | -118.1% | +11.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -37.2% | -10.9% | -155.1% | +4.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -84.0% | -2.5% | -7.1% | +5.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -26.6% | +21.2% | -4.3% | -4.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.8% | +53.2% | -4.6% | -18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TSAT and AMC each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, AMC's 4.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TSAT's 19.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $769M | $930M | $35.3B | $3.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.0B | $8.6B | $64.4B | $6.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.73x | -1.24x | -2.43x | 26.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 12.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.84x | 4.67x | — | 12.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.51x | 0.19x | 2.35x | 1.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.59x | — | 6.07x | 8.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 18.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CNK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CNK delivers a 25.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-177 for SATS. TSAT carries lower financial leverage with a 2.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNK's 9.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CNK scores 5/9 vs TSAT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.1% | — | -176.8% | +25.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.3% | -6.9% | -44.6% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.9% | +23.7% | -32.9% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.1% | +29.0% | -41.3% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.00x | — | 5.33x | 9.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.0B | $7.7B | $29.1B | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $494M | $429M | $1.9B | $344M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.5B | $8.1B | $31.0B | $3.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.29x | 0.35x | -11.42x | 1.89x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SATS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SATS five years ago would be worth $45,908 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $160 for AMC. Over the past 12 months, SATS leads with a +405.6% total return vs AMC's -43.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SATS at 97.8% vs AMC's -70.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +79.5% | -5.6% | +9.3% | +17.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +241.5% | -43.9% | +405.6% | -10.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +515.9% | -97.4% | +674.1% | +71.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.0% | -98.4% | +359.1% | +29.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.2% | -84.7% | +209.8% | -6.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +83.3% | -70.5% | +97.8% | +19.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TSAT and CNK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNK is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TSAT's 2.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TSAT currently trades 94.3% from its 52-week high vs AMC's 37.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.30x | 1.82x | 1.25x | 0.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $55.52 | $4.08 | $137.44 | $34.01 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.77 | $0.93 | $14.90 | $21.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.3% | +37.3% | +89.2% | +80.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.8 | 60.0 | 54.1 | 43.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 186K | 30.1M | 5.9M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
TSAT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TSAT as "Hold", AMC as "Hold", SATS as "Buy", CNK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.6% upside for AMC (target: $2) vs -61.8% for TSAT (target: $20). CNK is the only dividend payer here at 1.05% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.00 | $2.00 | $131.00 | $31.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 28 | 11 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +8.6% |
AMC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). CNK leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
TSAT vs AMC vs SATS vs CNK: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TSAT or AMC or SATS or CNK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.
(AMC) is the stronger pick with 4. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -26. 9% for Telesat Corporation (TSAT). Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (CNK) offers the better valuation at 26. 4x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate EchoStar Corporation (SATS) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TSAT or AMC or SATS or CNK?
Over the past 5 years, EchoStar Corporation (SATS) delivered a total return of +359.
1%, compared to -98. 4% for AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (AMC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SATS returned +209. 8% versus AMC's -84. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TSAT or AMC or SATS or CNK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
(CNK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus Telesat Corporation's 2. 30β — meaning TSAT is approximately 957% more volatile than CNK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Telesat Corporation (TSAT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 200% versus 9% for Cinemark Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TSAT or AMC or SATS or CNK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.
(AMC) is pulling ahead at 4. 6% versus -26. 9% for Telesat Corporation (TSAT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. grew EPS -16. 0% year-over-year, compared to -113. 6% for EchoStar Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CNK leads at 8. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TSAT or AMC or SATS or CNK?
Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
(CNK) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 4% net margin versus -155. 1% for EchoStar Corporation — meaning it keeps 4. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMC leads at 38. 1% versus -118. 1% for SATS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMC leads at 75. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is TSAT or AMC or SATS or CNK more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMC: 31.
6% to $2. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — TSAT or AMC or SATS or CNK?
In this comparison, CNK (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. TSAT, AMC, SATS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is TSAT or AMC or SATS or CNK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
(CNK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 22), 1. 1% yield). Telesat Corporation (TSAT) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNK: -6. 6%, TSAT: +69. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TSAT and AMC and SATS and CNK?
These companies operate in different sectors (TSAT (Technology) and AMC (Communication Services) and SATS (Technology) and CNK (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
CNK pays a dividend while TSAT, AMC, SATS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 10%
- Gross Margin > 45%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 24%
- Dividend Yield > 0.5%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.