TSE
Trinseo PLC
Chemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$5M
5Y Perf.-99.4%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TSE vs HUN vs DOW vs EMN vs LYB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
HUN
Huntsman Corporation
Chemicals
Market Cap$2.56B
5Y Perf.-30.3%
DOW
Dow Inc.
Chemicals
Market Cap$26.86B
5Y Perf.-20.4%
EMN
Eastman Chemical Company
Chemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$8.43B
5Y Perf.+10.9%
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
Chemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$23.04B
5Y Perf.-9.8%
TSE vs HUN vs DOW vs EMN vs LYB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TSE | HUN | DOW | EMN | LYB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals | Chemicals | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $5M | $2.56B | $26.86B | $8.43B | $23.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.13B | $5.69B | $39.33B | $8.64B | $22.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-412M | $-324M | $-2.76B | $399M | $-774M |
| Gross Margin | 6.2% | 12.9% | 6.2% | 19.8% | -19.3% |
| Operating Margin | -4.3% | -1.0% | -2.3% | 9.4% | -0.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 12.6x | 12.5x | 9.9x |
| Total Debt | $2.48B | $2.73B | $19.60B | $5.08B | $15.96B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $210M | $429M | $3.82B | $566M | $3.45B |
TSE vs HUN vs DOW vs EMN vs LYB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TSE
HUN
DOW
EMN
LYB
| Stock | May 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trinseo PLC (TSE) | 100 | 0.6 | -99.4% |
| Huntsman Corporation (HUN) | 100 | 69.7 | -30.3% |
| Dow Inc. (DOW) | 100 | 79.6 | -20.4% |
| Eastman Chemical Co… (EMN) | 100 | 110.9 | +10.9% |
| LyondellBasell Indu… (LYB) | 100 | 90.2 | -9.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TSE vs HUN vs DOW vs EMN vs LYB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TSE and EMN are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Eastman Chemical Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. LYB and HUN also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TSE
Trinseo PLC
The Growth Play
TSE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth -4.4%, EPS growth 50.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -10.1%
- -4.4% revenue growth vs LYB's -25.2%
- 38.5% yield, vs EMN's 4.5%
Best for: growth exposure
HUN
Huntsman Corporation
The Momentum Pick
HUN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +37.5% vs TSE's -96.9%
Best for: momentum
DOW
Dow Inc.
The Defensive Pick
DOW is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, current ratio 1.97x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
EMN
Eastman Chemical Company
The Quality Compounder
EMN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 4.6% margin vs TSE's -13.2%
- 2.6% ROA vs TSE's -15.8%, ROIC 6.7% vs -2.0%
Best for: quality and efficiency
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
The Income Pick
LYB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 7.7%
- 48.6% 10Y total return vs HUN's 57.6%
- Beta 0.38, yield 7.7%, current ratio 1.77x
- Lower P/E (9.9x vs 12.6x)
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TSE | -4.4% revenue growth vs LYB's -25.2% |
| Value | LYB | Lower P/E (9.9x vs 12.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | EMN | 4.6% margin vs TSE's -13.2% |
| Stability / Safety | LYB | Beta 0.38 vs TSE's 2.94 |
| Dividends | TSE | 38.5% yield, vs EMN's 4.5% |
| Momentum (1Y) | HUN | +37.5% vs TSE's -96.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | EMN | 2.6% ROA vs TSE's -15.8%, ROIC 6.7% vs -2.0% |
TSE vs HUN vs DOW vs EMN vs LYB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
TSE vs HUN vs DOW vs EMN vs LYB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLEMNLAGGINGLYB
Who Leads Where
EMN leads in 2 of 6 categories
TSE leads 0 • HUN leads 0 • DOW leads 0 • LYB leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓LYBLyondellBasell Indust…
0leads
DOWDow Inc.
0leads
HUNHuntsman Corporation
0leads
TSETrinseo PLC
0leads
EMNEastman Chemical Comp…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs TSEvs HUNMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
EMN3/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
EMN7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EMN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOW is the larger business by revenue, generating $39.3B annually — 12.6x TSE's $3.1B. EMN is the more profitable business, keeping 4.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TSE's -13.2%. On growth, HUN holds the edge at +0.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TSETrinseo PLC | HUNHuntsman Corporat… | DOWDow Inc. | EMNEastman Chemical … | LYBLyondellBasell In… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.1B | $5.7B | $39.3B | $8.6B | $22.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $88M | $160M | $1.3B | $1.2B | $865M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$412M | -$324M | -$2.8B | $399M | -$774M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$96M | $135M | -$2.0B | $498M | $3.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +12.9% | +6.2% | +19.8% | -19.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | -1.0% | -2.3% | +9.4% | -0.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.2% | -5.7% | -7.0% | +4.6% | -3.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.1% | +2.4% | -5.1% | +5.8% | +13.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.3% | +0.7% | -6.1% | -4.9% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -23.5% | -3.3% | -68.2% | -40.8% | -100.0% |
EMN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — EMN and LYB each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, EMN's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LYB's 33.4x.
| Metric | TSETrinseo PLC | HUNHuntsman Corporat… | DOWDow Inc. | EMNEastman Chemical … | LYBLyondellBasell In… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5M | $2.6B | $26.9B | $8.4B | $23.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.3B | $4.9B | $42.6B | $12.9B | $35.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | -9.27x | -10.11x | 17.97x | -30.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 12.62x | 12.50x | 9.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 5.59x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.84x | 19.64x | 13.78x | 8.96x | 33.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 0.45x | 0.67x | 0.96x | 0.76x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.86x | 1.52x | 1.41x | 2.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.11x | — | 19.87x | 59.99x |
Evenly matched — EMN and LYB each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EMN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EMN delivers a 6.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-15 for DOW. EMN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.84x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LYB's 1.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TSE scores 5/9 vs HUN's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | TSETrinseo PLC | HUNHuntsman Corporat… | DOWDow Inc. | EMNEastman Chemical … | LYBLyondellBasell In… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -8.1% | -15.4% | +6.7% | -7.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.8% | -4.6% | -4.6% | +2.6% | -3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.0% | -0.6% | +0.6% | +6.7% | -1.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.1% | -0.7% | +0.5% | +7.5% | -1.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.92x | 1.12x | 0.84x | 1.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.3B | $2.3B | $15.8B | $4.5B | $12.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $210M | $429M | $3.8B | $566M | $3.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.5B | $2.7B | $19.6B | $5.1B | $16.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.43x | -1.08x | -1.51x | 2.22x | -1.42x |
EMN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — HUN and EMN and LYB each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LYB five years ago would be worth $8,867 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $346 for TSE. Over the past 12 months, HUN leads with a +37.5% total return vs TSE's -96.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EMN at 1.1% vs TSE's -76.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TSETrinseo PLC | HUNHuntsman Corporat… | DOWDow Inc. | EMNEastman Chemical … | LYBLyondellBasell In… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -80.6% | +45.5% | +55.2% | +15.8% | +62.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -96.9% | +37.5% | +37.3% | +2.3% | +37.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | -33.3% | -17.5% | +3.4% | -5.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.5% | -39.8% | -27.2% | -28.4% | -11.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.8% | +57.6% | +12.2% | +35.4% | +48.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -76.4% | -12.6% | -6.2% | +1.1% | -1.9% |
Evenly matched — HUN and EMN and LYB each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HUN and LYB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LYB is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TSE's 2.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HUN currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs TSE's 2.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TSETrinseo PLC | HUNHuntsman Corporat… | DOWDow Inc. | EMNEastman Chemical … | LYBLyondellBasell In… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.94x | 1.73x | 0.69x | 1.32x | 0.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.42 | $15.89 | $42.74 | $84.18 | $83.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.06 | $7.30 | $20.40 | $56.11 | $41.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.8% | +92.7% | +87.3% | +87.5% | +85.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.2 | 65.4 | 48.9 | 56.9 | 50.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 629K | 6.2M | 14.4M | 1.5M | 8.1M |
Evenly matched — HUN and LYB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TSE and EMN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HUN as "Hold", DOW as "Hold", EMN as "Buy", LYB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 6.0% upside for DOW (target: $40) vs -18.6% for HUN (target: $12). For income investors, TSE offers the higher dividend yield at 38.53% vs EMN's 4.47%.
| Metric | TSETrinseo PLC | HUNHuntsman Corporat… | DOWDow Inc. | EMNEastman Chemical … | LYBLyondellBasell In… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $12.00 | $39.55 | $77.29 | $73.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 33 | 35 | 35 | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +38.5% | +5.7% | +5.6% | +4.5% | +7.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.05 | $0.85 | $2.09 | $3.30 | $5.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +1.2% | +0.9% |
Evenly matched — TSE and EMN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
EMN leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 4 categories are tied.
Best OverallEastman Chemical Company (EMN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TSE vs HUN vs DOW vs EMN vs LYB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TSE or HUN or DOW or EMN or LYB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trinseo PLC (TSE) is the stronger pick with -4.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 2% for LyondellBasell Industries N. V. (LYB). Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) offers the better valuation at 18. 0x trailing P/E (12. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) a "Buy" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TSE or HUN or DOW or EMN or LYB?
On forward P/E, LyondellBasell Industries N.
V. is actually cheaper at 9. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TSE or HUN or DOW or EMN or LYB?
Over the past 5 years, LyondellBasell Industries N.
V. (LYB) delivered a total return of -11. 3%, compared to -96. 5% for Trinseo PLC (TSE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HUN returned +57. 6% versus TSE's -79. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TSE or HUN or DOW or EMN or LYB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LyondellBasell Industries N.
V. (LYB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 32β versus Trinseo PLC's 2. 94β — meaning TSE is approximately 817% more volatile than LYB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 84% versus 156% for LyondellBasell Industries N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TSE or HUN or DOW or EMN or LYB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trinseo PLC (TSE) is pulling ahead at -4.
4% versus -25. 2% for LyondellBasell Industries N. V. (LYB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Trinseo PLC grew EPS 50. 3% year-over-year, compared to -335. 0% for Dow Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EMN leads at -6. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TSE or HUN or DOW or EMN or LYB?
Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
4% net margin versus -9. 9% for Trinseo PLC — meaning it keeps 5. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EMN leads at 10. 6% versus -1. 3% for TSE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EMN leads at 21. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TSE or HUN or DOW or EMN or LYB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, LyondellBasell Industries N.
V. (LYB) trades at 9. 9x forward P/E versus 12. 6x for Dow Inc. — 2. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DOW: 6. 0% to $39. 55.
08Which pays a better dividend — TSE or HUN or DOW or EMN or LYB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Trinseo PLC (TSE) offers the highest yield at 38. 5%, versus 4. 5% for Eastman Chemical Company (EMN).
09Is TSE or HUN or DOW or EMN or LYB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LyondellBasell Industries N.
V. (LYB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 32), 7. 7% yield). Trinseo PLC (TSE) carries a higher beta of 2. 94 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LYB: +49. 0%, TSE: -79. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TSE and HUN and DOW and EMN and LYB?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TSE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HUN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DOW is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; EMN is a small-cap deep-value stock; LYB is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(TSE: -14.3% · HUN: 0.7%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.