Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TSM vs LRCX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TSM
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited

Semiconductors

TechnologyNYSE • TW
Market Cap$2.05T
5Y Perf.+683.6%
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$344.41B
5Y Perf.+907.7%

TSM vs LRCX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TSM logoTSM
LRCX logoLRCX
IndustrySemiconductorsSemiconductors
Market Cap$2.05T$344.41B
Revenue (TTM)$3.82T$21.68B
Net Income (TTM)$1.72T$6.71B
Gross Margin59.9%50.0%
Operating Margin50.8%34.3%
Forward P/E0.8x48.8x
Total Debt$990.36B$4.76B
Cash & Equiv.$2.76T$6.39B

TSM vs LRCXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TSM
LRCX
StockMay 20May 26Return
Taiwan Semiconducto… (TSM)100783.6+683.6%
Lam Research Corpor… (LRCX)1001007.7+907.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TSM vs LRCX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TSM leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Lam Research Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TSM
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
The Income Pick

TSM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.91, yield 0.7%
  • Rev growth 33.0%, EPS growth 49.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.91, Low D/E 18.2%, current ratio 2.62x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

LRCX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 36.5% 10Y total return vs TSM's 16.5%
  • +274.5% vs TSM's +125.4%
  • 31.4% ROA vs TSM's 21.8%, ROIC 55.7% vs 42.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTSM logoTSM33.0% revenue growth vs LRCX's 23.7%
ValueTSM logoTSMLower P/E (0.8x vs 48.8x), PEG 0.03 vs 2.18
Quality / MarginsTSM logoTSM45.1% margin vs LRCX's 30.9%
Stability / SafetyTSM logoTSMBeta 1.91 vs LRCX's 2.54, lower leverage
DividendsTSM logoTSM0.7% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs LRCX's 0.3%
Momentum (1Y)LRCX logoLRCX+274.5% vs TSM's +125.4%
Efficiency (ROA)LRCX logoLRCX31.4% ROA vs TSM's 21.8%, ROIC 55.7% vs 42.7%

TSM vs LRCX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TSMTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
FY 2024
Other Products
100.0%$379.8B
LRCXLam Research Corporation
FY 2025
System
62.3%$11.5B
Customer Support and Other
37.7%$6.9B

TSM vs LRCX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTSMLAGGINGLRCX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TSM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

TSM is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.82T annually — 176.1x LRCX's $21.7B. TSM is the more profitable business, keeping 45.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LRCX's 30.9%.

MetricTSM logoTSMTaiwan Semiconduc…LRCX logoLRCXLam Research Corp…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.82T$21.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2.79T$7.8B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1.72T$6.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$1.02T$6.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+59.9%+50.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+50.8%+34.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+45.1%+30.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+26.7%+29.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+21.6%+23.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+42.0%+40.8%
TSM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TSM leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 37.2x trailing earnings, TSM trades at a 44% valuation discount to LRCX's 66.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TSM offers better value at 1.34x vs LRCX's 2.97x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricTSM logoTSMTaiwan Semiconduc…LRCX logoLRCXLam Research Corp…
Market CapShares × price$2.05T$344.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.99T$342.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS37.24x66.46x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.0.79x48.78x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.34x2.97x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple23.71x54.52x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue16.79x18.68x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share11.87x36.08x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF58.89x63.61x
TSM leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LRCX leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

LRCX delivers a 65.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $66 in annual profit, vs $32 for TSM. TSM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LRCX's 0.48x.

MetricTSM logoTSMTaiwan Semiconduc…LRCX logoLRCXLam Research Corp…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+31.6%+65.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+21.8%+31.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+42.7%+55.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+33.0%+40.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–988
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.18x0.48x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$1.77T-$1.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2.76T$6.4B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$990.4B$4.8B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense315.91x58.92x
LRCX leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

LRCX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LRCX five years ago would be worth $45,781 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $35,014 for TSM. Over the past 12 months, LRCX leads with a +274.5% total return vs TSM's +125.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LRCX at 73.9% vs TSM's 67.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTSM logoTSMTaiwan Semiconduc…LRCX logoLRCXLam Research Corp…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+23.7%+49.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+125.4%+274.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+372.0%+425.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+250.1%+357.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1645.5%+3647.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+67.7%+73.9%
LRCX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — TSM and LRCX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

TSM is the less volatile stock with a 1.91 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LRCX's 2.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LRCX currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs TSM's 95.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTSM logoTSMTaiwan Semiconduc…LRCX logoLRCXLam Research Corp…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.91x2.54x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$414.50$279.97
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$170.59$72.59
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+95.2%+98.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10064.955.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded13.1M9.6M
Evenly matched — TSM and LRCX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — TSM and LRCX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates TSM as "Buy" and LRCX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.4% upside for TSM (target: $428) vs 5.4% for LRCX (target: $291). For income investors, TSM offers the higher dividend yield at 0.73% vs LRCX's 0.32%.

MetricTSM logoTSMTaiwan Semiconduc…LRCX logoLRCXLam Research Corp…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$427.50$290.65
# AnalystsCovering analysts2550
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.7%+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises511
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$90.94$0.89
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.0%
Evenly matched — TSM and LRCX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

TSM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LRCX leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallTaiwan Semiconductor Manufa… (TSM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TSM vs LRCX: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TSM or LRCX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is the stronger pick with 33.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 23. 7% for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) offers the better valuation at 37. 2x trailing P/E (0. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TSM or LRCX?

On trailing P/E, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is the cheapest at 37.

2x versus Lam Research Corporation at 66. 5x. On forward P/E, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited is actually cheaper at 0. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited wins at 0. 03x versus Lam Research Corporation's 2. 18x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TSM or LRCX?

Over the past 5 years, Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) delivered a total return of +357.

8%, compared to +250. 1% for Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LRCX returned +36. 5% versus TSM's +1646%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TSM or LRCX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

91β versus Lam Research Corporation's 2. 54β — meaning LRCX is approximately 33% more volatile than TSM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 48% for Lam Research Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TSM or LRCX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is pulling ahead at 33.

0% versus 23. 7% for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited grew EPS 49. 8% year-over-year, compared to 43. 1% for Lam Research Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TSM leads at 19. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TSM or LRCX?

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is the more profitable company, earning 45.

1% net margin versus 29. 1% for Lam Research Corporation — meaning it keeps 45. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TSM leads at 50. 8% versus 32. 0% for LRCX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TSM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TSM or LRCX more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 03x versus Lam Research Corporation's 2. 18x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) trades at 0. 8x forward P/E versus 48. 8x for Lam Research Corporation — 48. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TSM: 8. 4% to $427. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TSM or LRCX?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) offers the highest yield at 0. 7%, versus 0. 3% for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX).

09

Is TSM or LRCX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.

7% yield, +1646% 10Y return). Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) carries a higher beta of 2. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TSM: +1646%, LRCX: +36. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TSM and LRCX?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

TSM pays a dividend while LRCX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

TSM

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 27%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LRCX

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TSM and LRCX on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TSM: 21.6% · LRCX: 23.8%)
Net Margin>
%
(TSM: 45.1% · LRCX: 30.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(TSM: 37.2x · LRCX: 66.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.