TT
Trane Technologies plc
Construction
Market Cap$103.99B
5Y Perf.+420.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TT vs WMS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
WMS
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
Construction
Market Cap$12.25B
5Y Perf.+224.9%
TT vs WMS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TT | WMS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction | Construction |
| Market Cap | $103.99B | $12.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $21.60B | $2.99B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.90B | $471M |
| Gross Margin | 35.9% | 38.2% |
| Operating Margin | 18.2% | 22.8% |
| Forward P/E | 31.7x | 23.7x |
| Total Debt | $4.62B | $1.45B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.76B | $463M |
TT vs WMS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TT
WMS
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trane Technologies … (TT) | 100 | 520.8 | +420.8% |
| Advanced Drainage S… (WMS) | 100 | 324.9 | +224.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TT vs WMS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TT leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TT
Trane Technologies plc
The Income Pick
TT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.97, yield 0.8%
- Rev growth 7.5%, EPS growth 15.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.1%
- 8.7% 10Y total return vs WMS's 5.5%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
WMS
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
The Value Play
WMS is the clearest fit if your priority is value and quality.
- Lower P/E (23.7x vs 31.7x)
- 15.7% margin vs TT's 13.4%
- +30.2% vs TT's +16.3%
Best for: value and quality
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TT | 7.5% revenue growth vs WMS's 1.0% |
| Value | WMS | Lower P/E (23.7x vs 31.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | WMS | 15.7% margin vs TT's 13.4% |
| Stability / Safety | TT | Beta 0.97 vs WMS's 1.32, lower leverage |
| Dividends | TT | 0.8% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs WMS's 0.4% |
| Momentum (1Y) | WMS | +30.2% vs TT's +16.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TT | 13.4% ROA vs WMS's 11.4%, ROIC 26.2% vs 20.7% |
TT vs WMS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
TT vs WMS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTTLAGGINGWMS
WMSAdvanced Drainage Sys…
2leads
TTTrane Technologies plc
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs WMSMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
WMS5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
WMS6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
TT7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TT5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
TT2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
TT2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TT is the larger business by revenue, generating $21.6B annually — 7.2x WMS's $3.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 15.7% (WMS) to 13.4% (TT). On growth, TT holds the edge at +6.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TTTrane Technologie… | WMSAdvanced Drainage… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $21.6B | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.3B | $869M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.9B | $471M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.2B | $577M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.9% | +38.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.2% | +22.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +15.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.6% | +19.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.0% | +0.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.9% | +14.4% |
WMS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
WMS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.0x trailing earnings, WMS trades at a 31% valuation discount to TT's 36.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WMS's 15.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TT's 25.3x.
| Metric | TTTrane Technologie… | WMSAdvanced Drainage… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $104.0B | $12.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $106.8B | $13.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 36.20x | 25.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 31.69x | 23.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.21x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 25.25x | 15.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.88x | 4.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.21x | 6.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 36.99x | 33.23x |
WMS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TT delivers a 34.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $23 for WMS. TT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WMS's 0.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TT scores 9/9 vs WMS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | TTTrane Technologie… | WMSAdvanced Drainage… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +34.7% | +23.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.4% | +11.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +26.2% | +20.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +27.2% | +21.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 0.88x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.9B | $982M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.8B | $463M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.6B | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 17.21x | 7.75x |
TT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TT five years ago would be worth $26,428 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,716 for WMS. Over the past 12 months, WMS leads with a +30.2% total return vs TT's +16.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TT at 39.5% vs WMS's 18.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TTTrane Technologie… | WMSAdvanced Drainage… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.3% | -3.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.3% | +30.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +171.7% | +67.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +164.3% | +27.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +874.8% | +549.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.5% | +18.8% |
TT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TT is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WMS's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TT currently trades 93.3% from its 52-week high vs WMS's 80.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TTTrane Technologie… | WMSAdvanced Drainage… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.97x | 1.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $503.47 | $179.31 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $348.06 | $104.69 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.3% | +80.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.2 | 51.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 860K |
TT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
TT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TT as "Hold" and WMS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 40.7% upside for WMS (target: $203) vs 10.4% for TT (target: $519). For income investors, TT offers the higher dividend yield at 0.80% vs WMS's 0.44%.
| Metric | TTTrane Technologie… | WMSAdvanced Drainage… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $518.50 | $202.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.74 | $0.64 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | +0.6% |
TT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
TT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). WMS leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics).
Best OverallTrane Technologies plc (TT)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TT vs WMS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TT or WMS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trane Technologies plc (TT) is the stronger pick with 7.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. (WMS). Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. (WMS) offers the better valuation at 25. 0x trailing P/E (23. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Trane Technologies plc (TT) a "Hold" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TT or WMS?
On trailing P/E, Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
(WMS) is the cheapest at 25. 0x versus Trane Technologies plc at 36. 2x. On forward P/E, Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. is actually cheaper at 23. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TT or WMS?
Over the past 5 years, Trane Technologies plc (TT) delivered a total return of +164.
3%, compared to +27. 2% for Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. (WMS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TT returned +874. 8% versus WMS's +549. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TT or WMS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Trane Technologies plc (TT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
97β versus Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning WMS is approximately 37% more volatile than TT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trane Technologies plc (TT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 88% for Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TT or WMS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trane Technologies plc (TT) is pulling ahead at 7.
5% versus 1. 0% for Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. (WMS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Trane Technologies plc grew EPS 15. 5% year-over-year, compared to -10. 7% for Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TT leads at 10. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TT or WMS?
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
(WMS) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus 13. 7% for Trane Technologies plc — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WMS leads at 22. 6% versus 18. 6% for TT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WMS leads at 37. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TT or WMS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
(WMS) trades at 23. 7x forward P/E versus 31. 7x for Trane Technologies plc — 8. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WMS: 40. 7% to $202. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — TT or WMS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Trane Technologies plc (TT) offers the highest yield at 0. 8%, versus 0. 4% for Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. (WMS).
09Is TT or WMS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Trane Technologies plc (TT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
97), 0. 8% yield, +874. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TT: +874. 8%, WMS: +549. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TT and WMS?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
TT pays a dividend while WMS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(TT: 6.0% · WMS: 0.4%)Net Margin>
%
(TT: 13.4% · WMS: 15.7%)P/E Ratio<
x
(TT: 36.2x · WMS: 25.0x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.