Construction
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WMS vs NVR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Residential Construction
WMS vs NVR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction | Residential Construction |
| Market Cap | $12.64B | $16.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.99B | $10.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $471M | $1.34B |
| Gross Margin | 38.2% | 22.8% |
| Operating Margin | 22.8% | 16.5% |
| Forward P/E | 24.5x | 16.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.45B | $1.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $463M | $1.96B |
WMS vs NVR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced Drainage S… (WMS) | 100 | 335.4 | +235.4% |
| NVR, Inc. (NVR) | 100 | 189.1 | +89.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WMS vs NVR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WMS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 1.0%, EPS growth -10.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.6%
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs NVR's 272.4%
- 1.0% revenue growth vs NVR's -2.1%
NVR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.68
- Lower volatility, beta 0.68, Low D/E 31.0%, current ratio 3.95x
- Beta 0.68, current ratio 3.95x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.0% revenue growth vs NVR's -2.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.9x vs 24.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.7% margin vs NVR's 13.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs WMS's 1.32, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.4% vs NVR's -12.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.3% ROA vs WMS's 11.4%, ROIC 43.8% vs 20.7% |
WMS vs NVR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WMS vs NVR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVR is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.2B annually — 3.4x WMS's $3.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 15.7% (WMS) to 13.2% (NVR). On growth, WMS holds the edge at +0.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.0B | $10.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $869M | $1.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $471M | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $577M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.2% | +22.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.8% | +16.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | +13.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.3% | +10.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.4% | -4.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.4% | -13.1% |
Valuation Metrics
NVR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.0x trailing earnings, NVR trades at a 46% valuation discount to WMS's 25.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NVR's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WMS's 16.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.6B | $16.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.6B | $16.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.82x | 13.95x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.47x | 16.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.02x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.20x | 9.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.35x | 1.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.11x | 4.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 34.30x | 15.43x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVR delivers a 34.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $23 for WMS. NVR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WMS's 0.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMS scores 6/9 vs NVR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +23.2% | +34.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.4% | +22.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +20.7% | +43.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.5% | +32.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.88x | 0.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $982M | -$760M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $463M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.4B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.75x | 63.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMS five years ago would be worth $13,917 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,865 for NVR. Over the past 12 months, WMS leads with a +32.4% total return vs NVR's -12.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMS at 20.0% vs NVR's 1.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.5% | -16.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.4% | -12.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.0% | +4.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.2% | +18.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +567.5% | +272.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.0% | +1.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WMS and NVR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NVR is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WMS's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMS currently trades 82.9% from its 52-week high vs NVR's 70.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.32x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $179.31 | $8618.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $104.69 | $5930.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.9% | +70.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.6 | 33.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 865K | 20K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WMS as "Hold" and NVR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 36.3% upside for WMS (target: $203) vs 22.5% for NVR (target: $7465). WMS is the only dividend payer here at 0.43% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $202.67 | $7465.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.64 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +10.8% |
WMS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). NVR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
WMS vs NVR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WMS or NVR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
(WMS) is the stronger pick with 1. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 1% for NVR, Inc. (NVR). NVR, Inc. (NVR) offers the better valuation at 14. 0x trailing P/E (16. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NVR, Inc. (NVR) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WMS or NVR?
On trailing P/E, NVR, Inc.
(NVR) is the cheapest at 14. 0x versus Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. at 25. 8x. On forward P/E, NVR, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WMS or NVR?
Over the past 5 years, Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
(WMS) delivered a total return of +39. 2%, compared to +18. 6% for NVR, Inc. (NVR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMS returned +567. 5% versus NVR's +272. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WMS or NVR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NVR, Inc.
(NVR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 68β versus Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning WMS is approximately 95% more volatile than NVR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NVR, Inc. (NVR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 88% for Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WMS or NVR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
(WMS) is pulling ahead at 1. 0% versus -2. 1% for NVR, Inc. (NVR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. grew EPS -10. 7% year-over-year, compared to -13. 8% for NVR, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMS leads at 1. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WMS or NVR?
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
(WMS) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus 13. 0% for NVR, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WMS leads at 22. 6% versus 16. 2% for NVR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WMS leads at 37. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WMS or NVR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, NVR, Inc.
(NVR) trades at 16. 9x forward P/E versus 24. 5x for Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. — 7. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WMS: 36. 3% to $202. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — WMS or NVR?
In this comparison, WMS (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. NVR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WMS or NVR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NVR, Inc.
(NVR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 68), +272. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NVR: +272. 4%, WMS: +567. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WMS and NVR?
These companies operate in different sectors (WMS (Industrials) and NVR (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WMS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NVR is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.