Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TTI vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP vs WTTR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TTI
TETRA Technologies, Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.32B
5Y Perf.+2859.1%
KLXE
KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$58M
5Y Perf.-55.9%
NINE
Nine Energy Service, Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$427M
5Y Perf.+385.2%
PUMP
ProPetro Holding Corp.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.91B
5Y Perf.+214.1%
WTTR
Select Water Solutions, Inc.

Regulated Water

UtilitiesNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.89B
5Y Perf.+183.2%

TTI vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP vs WTTR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TTI logoTTI
KLXE logoKLXE
NINE logoNINE
PUMP logoPUMP
WTTR logoWTTR
IndustryOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesRegulated Water
Market Cap$1.32B$58M$427M$1.91B$1.89B
Revenue (TTM)$630M$637M$571M$1.18B$1.40B
Net Income (TTM)$7M$-77M$-41M$-12M$22M
Gross Margin24.6%21.2%11.5%8.3%18.2%
Operating Margin8.4%10.2%2.0%-1.1%2.3%
Forward P/E41.4x1993.6x41.7x
Total Debt$263M$318M$383M$249M$374M
Cash & Equiv.$45M$6M$18M$91M$18M

TTI vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP vs WTTRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TTI
KLXE
NINE
PUMP
WTTR
StockMay 20May 26Return
TETRA Technologies,… (TTI)1002959.1+2859.1%
KLX Energy Services… (KLXE)10044.1-55.9%
Nine Energy Service… (NINE)100485.2+385.2%
ProPetro Holding Co… (PUMP)100314.1+214.1%
Select Water Soluti… (WTTR)100283.2+183.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TTI vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP vs WTTR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: WTTR leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. TETRA Technologies, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. KLXE and NINE also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
TTI
TETRA Technologies, Inc.
The Growth Play

TTI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 5.3%, EPS growth -97.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.5%
  • 96.4% 10Y total return vs WTTR's 26.6%
  • 5.3% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0%
  • Lower P/E (41.4x vs 41.7x)
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
KLXE
KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc.
The Defensive Choice

KLXE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.

  • Beta 0.76 vs NINE's 3.21
Best for: stability
NINE
Nine Energy Service, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

NINE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +15.1% vs KLXE's +65.5%
Best for: momentum
PUMP
ProPetro Holding Corp.
The Energy Pick

Among these 5 stocks, PUMP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: energy exposure
WTTR
Select Water Solutions, Inc.
The Income Pick

WTTR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.09, yield 1.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.09, Low D/E 40.4%, current ratio 1.57x
  • Beta 1.09, yield 1.9%, current ratio 1.57x
  • 1.5% margin vs KLXE's -12.1%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTTI logoTTI5.3% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0%
ValueTTI logoTTILower P/E (41.4x vs 41.7x)
Quality / MarginsWTTR logoWTTR1.5% margin vs KLXE's -12.1%
Stability / SafetyKLXE logoKLXEBeta 0.76 vs NINE's 3.21
DividendsWTTR logoWTTR1.9% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NINE logoNINE+15.1% vs KLXE's +65.5%
Efficiency (ROA)WTTR logoWTTR1.3% ROA vs KLXE's -21.3%, ROIC 2.3% vs -9.4%

TTI vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP vs WTTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TTITETRA Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
55.7%$352M
Service
44.3%$279M
KLXEKLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc.
FY 2023
Rocky Mountains
100.0%$271M
NINENine Energy Service, Inc.
FY 2025
Service Revenue
38.4%$431M
Cement
18.8%$211M
Tool Revenue
11.6%$131M
Tools
11.6%$131M
Wireline
10.3%$116M
Coiled Tubing
9.3%$104M
PUMPProPetro Holding Corp.
FY 2025
Power Generation
100.0%$2M
WTTRSelect Water Solutions, Inc.
FY 2025
Water Services
71.6%$796M
Water Infrastructure
28.4%$316M

TTI vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP vs WTTR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTTILAGGINGPUMP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TTI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

WTTR is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 2.4x NINE's $571M. WTTR is the more profitable business, keeping 1.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KLXE's -12.1%. On growth, TTI holds the edge at -0.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTTI logoTTITETRA Technologie…KLXE logoKLXEKLX Energy Servic…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …WTTR logoWTTRSelect Water Solu…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$630M$637M$571M$1.2B$1.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$90M$160M$61M$154M$217M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$7M-$77M-$41M-$12M$22M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$3M-$42M-$7M-$11M-$95M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+24.6%+21.2%+11.5%+8.3%+18.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+8.4%+10.2%+2.0%-1.1%+2.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.2%-12.1%-7.2%-1.1%+1.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+0.4%-6.5%-1.2%-0.9%-6.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-0.6%-5.3%-4.4%-24.7%-2.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+100.0%+13.3%-34.6%-134.2%-4.4%
TTI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

KLXE leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 84.1x trailing earnings, WTTR trades at a 96% valuation discount to PUMP's 1993.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KLXE's 5.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NINE's 337.0x.

MetricTTI logoTTITETRA Technologie…KLXE logoKLXEKLX Energy Servic…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …WTTR logoWTTRSelect Water Solu…
Market CapShares × price$1.3B$58M$427M$1.9B$1.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.5B$371M$791M$2.1B$2.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS439.86x-0.79x-7.88x1993.59x84.10x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.41.38x41.66x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple15.93x5.71x337.01x10.67x10.70x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.09x0.09x1.50x1.34x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.67x1.98x1.88x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF67.62x44.88x
KLXE leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — TTI and PUMP each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

TTI delivers a 2.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-1 for PUMP. PUMP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TTI's 0.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PUMP scores 5/9 vs NINE's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricTTI logoTTITETRA Technologie…KLXE logoKLXEKLX Energy Servic…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …WTTR logoWTTRSelect Water Solu…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+2.5%-1.4%+2.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.1%-21.3%-11.5%-1.0%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.5%-9.4%+0.7%+1.4%+2.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.7%-11.4%+0.9%+1.8%+2.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–943153
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.93x0.30x0.40x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$218M$313M$364M$158M$356M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$45M$6M$18M$91M$18M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$263M$318M$383M$249M$374M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.96x-0.67x0.24x-0.86x1.54x
Evenly matched — TTI and PUMP each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — TTI and NINE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NINE five years ago would be worth $48,522 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,717 for KLXE. Over the past 12 months, NINE leads with a +1505.8% total return vs KLXE's +65.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TTI at 48.9% vs KLXE's -31.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTTI logoTTITETRA Technologie…KLXE logoKLXEKLX Energy Servic…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …WTTR logoWTTRSelect Water Solu…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-0.3%+68.0%+2682.5%+58.4%+52.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+246.3%+65.5%+1505.8%+201.4%+134.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+229.9%-68.3%+150.0%+132.8%+135.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+183.0%-72.8%+385.2%+41.6%+158.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+96.4%-97.6%-62.3%+7.2%+26.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+48.9%-31.8%+35.7%+32.5%+33.1%
Evenly matched — TTI and NINE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — KLXE and NINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KLXE is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NINE's 3.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NINE currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs TTI's 77.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTTI logoTTITETRA Technologie…KLXE logoKLXEKLX Energy Servic…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …WTTR logoWTTRSelect Water Solu…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.46x0.76x3.21x1.12x1.09x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$12.54$4.06$10.23$18.50$17.95
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.63$1.46$0.00$4.51$7.20
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+77.9%+80.3%+96.3%+84.1%+93.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10063.656.982.951.969.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.8M307K125K3.5M1.7M
Evenly matched — KLXE and NINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

WTTR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: TTI as "Buy", NINE as "Hold", PUMP as "Buy", WTTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 82.7% upside for NINE (target: $18) vs -5.1% for PUMP (target: $15). WTTR is the only dividend payer here at 1.93% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricTTI logoTTITETRA Technologie…KLXE logoKLXEKLX Energy Servic…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …WTTR logoWTTRSelect Water Solu…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$12.25$18.00$14.75$16.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts3193014
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises113
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.32
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.4%
WTTR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

TTI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). KLXE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallTETRA Technologies, Inc. (TTI)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TTI vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP vs WTTR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TTI or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or WTTR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, TETRA Technologies, Inc.

(TTI) is the stronger pick with 5. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). Select Water Solutions, Inc. (WTTR) offers the better valuation at 84. 1x trailing P/E (41. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TETRA Technologies, Inc. (TTI) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TTI or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or WTTR?

On trailing P/E, Select Water Solutions, Inc.

(WTTR) is the cheapest at 84. 1x versus ProPetro Holding Corp. at 1993. 6x. On forward P/E, TETRA Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 41. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TTI or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or WTTR?

Over the past 5 years, Nine Energy Service, Inc.

(NINE) delivered a total return of +385. 2%, compared to -72. 8% for KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. (KLXE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TTI returned +96. 4% versus KLXE's -97. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TTI or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or WTTR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc.

(KLXE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Nine Energy Service, Inc. 's 3. 21β — meaning NINE is approximately 321% more volatile than KLXE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 93% for TETRA Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TTI or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or WTTR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TETRA Technologies, Inc.

(TTI) is pulling ahead at 5. 3% versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ProPetro Holding Corp. grew EPS 100. 6% year-over-year, compared to -97. 3% for TETRA Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTI leads at 4. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TTI or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or WTTR?

Select Water Solutions, Inc.

(WTTR) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 5% net margin versus -12. 1% for KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TTI leads at 9. 4% versus -4. 8% for KLXE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TTI leads at 25. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TTI or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or WTTR more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, TETRA Technologies, Inc.

(TTI) trades at 41. 4x forward P/E versus 41. 7x for Select Water Solutions, Inc. — 0. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NINE: 82. 7% to $18. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TTI or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or WTTR?

In this comparison, WTTR (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. TTI, KLXE, NINE, PUMP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is TTI or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or WTTR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Select Water Solutions, Inc.

(WTTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), 1. 9% yield). Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) carries a higher beta of 3. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WTTR: +26. 6%, NINE: -62. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TTI and KLXE and NINE and PUMP and WTTR?

These companies operate in different sectors (TTI (Energy) and KLXE (Energy) and NINE (Energy) and PUMP (Energy) and WTTR (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

WTTR pays a dividend while TTI, KLXE, NINE, PUMP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TTI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KLXE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NINE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PUMP

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WTTR

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TTI and KLXE and NINE and PUMP and WTTR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TTI: -0.6% · KLXE: -5.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.