TTMI vs VECO vs COHU vs MKSI vs ENTG

For growth investors, TTM Technologies, Inc.

(TTMI) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for Veeco Instruments Inc. (VECO). MKS Inc. (MKSI) offers the better valuation at 68. 8x trailing P/E (30. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TTM Technologies, Inc. (TTMI) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, MKS Inc.

(MKSI) is the cheapest at 68. 8x versus Veeco Instruments Inc. at 97. 8x. On forward P/E, MKS Inc. is actually cheaper at 30. 4x.

Over the past 5 years, TTM Technologies, Inc.

(TTMI) delivered a total return of +919. 0%, compared to +22. 2% for Cohu, Inc. (COHU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TTMI returned +23. 1% versus VECO's +239. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Veeco Instruments Inc.

(VECO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 97β versus TTM Technologies, Inc. 's 3. 19β — meaning TTMI is approximately 62% more volatile than VECO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Veeco Instruments Inc. (VECO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TTM Technologies, Inc.

(TTMI) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus -7. 4% for Veeco Instruments Inc. (VECO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TTM Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 211. 1% year-over-year, compared to -52. 0% for Veeco Instruments Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTMI leads at 5. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

MKS Inc.

(MKSI) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 5% net margin versus -16. 4% for Cohu, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ENTG leads at 28. 9% versus -13. 3% for COHU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ENTG leads at 44. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, MKS Inc.

(MKSI) trades at 30. 4x forward P/E versus 89. 2x for Cohu, Inc. — 58. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COHU: 4. 8% to $49. 75.

In this comparison, MKSI (0.

3% yield), ENTG (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. TTMI, VECO, COHU do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Entegris, Inc.

(ENTG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1040% 10Y return). TTM Technologies, Inc. (TTMI) carries a higher beta of 3. 19 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ENTG: +1040%, TTMI: +23. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TTMI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VECO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COHU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MKSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ENTG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.